1992: States where Perot cost Bush the electoral votes (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:39:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1992: States where Perot cost Bush the electoral votes (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1992: States where Perot cost Bush the electoral votes  (Read 1856 times)
Fuzzy Says: "Abolish NPR!"
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,675
United States


WWW
« on: October 01, 2016, 09:17:39 PM »

Clinton still would have won the election without Perot, but it would have been closer. On a state by state basis, it looks like there are a handful of states that Bush most likely would have won without Perot on the ballot.

Maine
New Hampshire
Georgia
Montana
Colorado

The states that cost Bush in 1992 probably went for Dole in 2000.

Montana, Georgia, and Colorado are in this category as was Nevada back then.  I would argue that Tennessee was in that category as well; it would have went for Gore in 2000 if it were not.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.