|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2020, 06:12:29 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Google Consumer Surveys 50-state breakdown
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7
Author Topic: Google Consumer Surveys 50-state breakdown  (Read 12060 times)
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 11, 2016, 03:23:41 pm »

538 crunched the DC numbers.. They may be close to accurate if they took that leading 2 for Trump and added the 20% to Clinton. (Obviously, the sample sizes are hideous).

AUG. 31-SEP. 6   Google Consumer Surveys    66   LV   
Clinton 48%
Trump 22%
Johnson 9%

AUG. 24-30   Google Consumer Surveys   67   LV   
Clinton 44%
Trump 26%
Johnson 10%

AUG. 17-23   Google Consumer Surveys   
58   LV   
Clinton 54%
Trump 22%
Johnson 8%

AUG. 10-16   Google Consumer Surveys   54   LV   
Clinton 44%
Trump 25%
Johnson 6%
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 11, 2016, 03:25:50 pm »

538 crunched the DC numbers.. They may be close to accurate if they took that leading 2 for Trump and added the 20% to Clinton. (Obviously, the sample sizes are hideous).

AUG. 31-SEP. 6   Google Consumer Surveys    66   LV   
Clinton 48%
Trump 22%
Johnson 9%

AUG. 24-30   Google Consumer Surveys   67   LV   
Clinton 44%
Trump 26%
Johnson 10%

AUG. 17-23   Google Consumer Surveys   
58   LV   
Clinton 54%
Trump 22%
Johnson 8%

AUG. 10-16   Google Consumer Surveys   54   LV   
Clinton 44%
Trump 25%
Johnson 6%
That's embarrassingly bad. Did they just not interview black people at all?
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,790
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 11, 2016, 03:33:12 pm »

Even among white people in DC, I doubt Trump will even get double digit support lol
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,868
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 11, 2016, 07:21:46 pm »

Even among white people in DC, I doubt Trump will even get double digit support lol
We should convince CNN to commission exit polls there Tongue
Logged
emailking
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,023
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 12, 2016, 11:07:04 am »

Now do you guys believe me that Nate's lost it, and really isn't doing much other than making a glorified polling map?

Not at all. Data is data. You don't throw it out because you don't think it's right. It's given a low weight in the database because of the small sample sizes. He throws out polls that are believed to be fake, but not polls that are real with seemingly strange results. If you can't understand the rationale in this, well I'm sorry. But that's problem with you and your understanding of statistics, rather than with Nate and his application of it.

I was one of the first to call out discredited fraud Nate Silver.

You discredited yourself by pretending to love Trump for the better part of a year.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 12, 2016, 12:50:53 pm »


I like Pennsylvania results!
Pennsylvania: Google Consumer Surveys, 8/31-9/6, 808 LV
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/#plus
TRUMP 35% | Hillary 33% | Johnson 11%
(Liberal hero, Nate Silver adjusted it as TRUMP +2%)
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,868
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 12, 2016, 02:34:47 pm »


I like Pennsylvania results!
Pennsylvania: Google Consumer Surveys, 8/31-9/6, 808 LV
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/#plus
TRUMP 35% | Hillary 33% | Johnson 11%
(Liberal hero, Nate Silver adjusted it as TRUMP +2%)
Then surely you also like Clinton +12 in WI...?
Logged
Lok
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,277
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 12, 2016, 04:55:08 pm »


I like Pennsylvania results!
Pennsylvania: Google Consumer Surveys, 8/31-9/6, 808 LV
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/#plus
TRUMP 35% | Hillary 33% | Johnson 11%
(Liberal hero, Nate Silver adjusted it as TRUMP +2%)

He didn't adjust the numbers at all in the polls-plus part...
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 13, 2016, 01:36:45 am »


I like Pennsylvania results!
Pennsylvania: Google Consumer Surveys, 8/31-9/6, 808 LV
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/#plus
TRUMP 35% | Hillary 33% | Johnson 11%
(Liberal hero, Nate Silver adjusted it as TRUMP +2%)
Then surely you also like Clinton +12 in WI...?

Why not?

PA ( 20 ) - WI (10) = +10  ♬
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,501
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 13, 2016, 01:39:23 am »


I like Pennsylvania results!
Pennsylvania: Google Consumer Surveys, 8/31-9/6, 808 LV
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/pennsylvania/#plus
TRUMP 35% | Hillary 33% | Johnson 11%
(Liberal hero, Nate Silver adjusted it as TRUMP +2%)
Then surely you also like Clinton +12 in WI...?

Why not?

PA ( 20 ) - WI (10) = +10  ♬

Have you just gone into self-aware self-parody?
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,522
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 13, 2016, 11:30:11 am »

Junk. Trump isn't ahead ten points in NM.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 13, 2016, 12:00:05 pm »

Junk. Trump isn't ahead ten points in NM.

why you exaggerate TRUMP's leads in New Mexico?
New Mexico: Aug. 31-Sep. 6  Google Consumer Surveys, 215 LV
TRUMP 30% | Hillary 27% | Johnson 18%
and your liberal hero Nate Silver adjusted as +3% (same as results.)
Wink
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/new-mexico/#plus
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,522
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 13, 2016, 04:19:20 pm »

Junk. Trump isn't ahead ten points in NM.

why you exaggerate TRUMP's leads in New Mexico?
New Mexico: Aug. 31-Sep. 6  Google Consumer Surveys, 215 LV
TRUMP 30% | Hillary 27% | Johnson 18%
and your liberal hero Nate Silver adjusted as +3% (same as results.)
Wink
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/new-mexico/#plus


I meant this:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,517
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 13, 2016, 04:23:45 pm »

ACtually decided to dig through and find out that - they literally have 21% undecided.

My god is there worse trash in the world?
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,054
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: September 14, 2016, 02:20:17 pm »

538 updated with their newest results, which include these gems:

Arkansas: Trump +1
DC: Clinton +6
Kansas: Clinton +9
New Jersey: Clinton +2
West Virginia: Clinton +1
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,647
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: September 14, 2016, 02:22:14 pm »

538 updated with their newest results, which include these gems:

Arkansas: Trump +1
DC: Clinton +6
Kansas: Clinton +9
New Jersey: Clinton +2
West Virginia: Clinton +1
I can't even
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: September 14, 2016, 02:23:15 pm »

538 updated with their newest results, which include these gems:

Arkansas: Trump +1
DC: Clinton +6
Kansas: Clinton +9
New Jersey: Clinton +2
West Virginia: Clinton +1

Good lord
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,558


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: September 14, 2016, 02:38:55 pm »

538 updated with their newest results, which include these gems:

Arkansas: Trump +1
DC: Clinton +6
Kansas: Clinton +9
New Jersey: Clinton +2
West Virginia: Clinton +1

That's a 30 point swing in West Virginia in a week.

Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,023
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: September 14, 2016, 03:06:38 pm »

At this moment don't get why are they including these polls in the forecasts at all even though they give them small weight. Even with bigger sample sizes they have Trump up 10 in FL and Clinton up by only 8 i think in IL
Logged
Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,773
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: September 14, 2016, 03:10:55 pm »

At this moment don't get why are they including these polls in the forecasts at all even though they give them small weight. Even with bigger sample sizes they have Trump up 10 in FL and Clinton up by only 8 i think in IL
I would say it looks pretty plausible in states that have enough respondents.
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,868
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: September 14, 2016, 03:40:01 pm »

At this moment don't get why are they including these polls in the forecasts at all even though they give them small weight. Even with bigger sample sizes they have Trump up 10 in FL and Clinton up by only 8 i think in IL
I would say it looks pretty plausible in states that have enough respondents.
If you assume that the race is Trump +7, yeah. I don't (sane)
Logged
Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,773
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: September 14, 2016, 03:41:35 pm »

At this moment don't get why are they including these polls in the forecasts at all even though they give them small weight. Even with bigger sample sizes they have Trump up 10 in FL and Clinton up by only 8 i think in IL
I would say it looks pretty plausible in states that have enough respondents.
If you assume that the race is Trump +7, yeah. I don't (sane)
What's the map look like?
Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,868
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: September 14, 2016, 04:08:42 pm »

At this moment don't get why are they including these polls in the forecasts at all even though they give them small weight. Even with bigger sample sizes they have Trump up 10 in FL and Clinton up by only 8 i think in IL
I would say it looks pretty plausible in states that have enough respondents.
If you assume that the race is Trump +7, yeah. I don't (sane)
What's the map look like?


And, assuming Trump gets NE-2 and ME-2, NH becomes the tipping point. Given what we know about it, this would clearly produce an anti-2000 result Tongue
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: September 22, 2016, 02:05:43 am »

Seek help.
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: September 22, 2016, 02:24:28 am »
« Edited: September 22, 2016, 02:33:28 am by Ebsy »

National Topline
Clinton: 36
Trump: 35
Johnson: 8
Undecided: 31

Alaska
Trump: 39
Clinton: 21

Alabama
Trump: 55
Clinton: 18

Arkansas
Clinton: 36
Trump: 35

Arizona
Clinton: 37
Trump: 32

California
Clinton: 46
Trump: 28

Colorado
Clinton: 40
Trump: 28

Connecticut
Clinton: 39
Trump: 32

DC
Clinton: 43
Trump: 28

Delaware
Clinton: 41
Trump: 30

Florida
Trump: 43
Clinton: 30

Georgia
Trump: 45
Clinton: 30

Hawaii
Clinton: 43
Trump: 32

Iowa
Trump: 31
Clinton: 30

Idaho
Trump: 44
Clinton: 19

Illinois
Clinton: 39
Trump: 29

Indiana
Trump: 32
Clinton: 32

Kansas
Clinton: 41
Trump: 30

Kentucky
Trump: 41
Clinton: 30

Louisiana
Trump: 54
Clinton: 25

Massachusetts
Clinton: 50
Trump: 24

Maryland
Clinton: 43
Trump: 27

Maine
Trump: 35
Clinton: 33

Michigan
Clinton: 35
Trump: 34

Minnesota
Clinton: 37
Trump: 27

Missouri
Clinton: 33
Trump: 32

Mississippi
Trump: 55
Clinton: 17

Montana
Clinton: 33
Trump: 29

North Carolina
Trump: 40
Clinton: 32

North Dakota
Trump: 39
Clinton: 17

Nebraska
Trump: 42
Clinton: 29

New Hampshire
Trump: 38
Clinton: 28

New Jersey
Trump: 36
Clinton: 36

New Mexico
Clinton: 30
Trump: 30

Nevada
Trump: 34
Clinton: 32

New York
Clinton: 42
Trump: 28

Ohio
Clinton: 34
Trump: 33

Oklahoma
Trump: 43
Clinton: 28

Oregon
Clinton: 40
Trump: 28

Pennsylvania
Trump: 36
Clinton: 35

Rhode Island
Clinton: 46
Trump: 31

South Carolina
Trump: 41
Clinton: 33

South Dakota
Clinton: 31
Trump: 30

Tennessee
Trump: 42
Clinton: 29

Texas
Trump: 42
Clinton: 29

Utah
Clinton: 28
Trump: 24

Virginia
Trump: 37
Clinton: 36

Vermont
Clinton: 44
Trump: 19

Washington
Clinton: 37
Trump: 28

Wisconsin
Clinton: 42
Trump: 24

West Virginia
Trump: 36
Clinton: 19

Wyoming
Trump: 45
Clinton: 30
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 15 queries.