WI-Global Strategy Group: Feingold +18
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 12:33:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  WI-Global Strategy Group: Feingold +18
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI-Global Strategy Group: Feingold +18  (Read 929 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 05, 2016, 09:20:37 PM »

Internal poll for EDF Action and LCV Victory Fund.

Feingold: 55(+3 from July)
Johnson: 37(-4 from July)

https://www.scribd.com/document/322753969/WI-Sen-Pres-GSG-for-LCV-Sept-2016
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2016, 09:29:48 PM »

Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2016, 09:43:24 PM »

Like the presidential number, this is a bit too high, but if Johnson is underperforming Trump, he's seventeen kinds of screwed.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,452
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2016, 09:47:56 PM »

Like the presidential number, this is a bit too high, but if Johnson is underperforming Trump, he's seventeen kinds of screwed.

L O L
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,578
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2016, 09:55:49 PM »

Internal ----> Trash


That being said, I won't be surprised if Johnson's performance is the worst of any incumbent republican senator (yes, I think Kirk could do better).
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,625
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2016, 10:45:20 PM »

Internal ----> Trash


That being said, I won't be surprised if Johnson's performance is the worst of any incumbent republican senator (yes, I think Kirk could do better).
At least Kirk will overperform Trump. I'm not sure if I can say the same for Johnson.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2016, 05:05:31 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,376
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2016, 05:09:05 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.

+1
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2016, 06:45:53 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2016, 09:31:38 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
That was pre-Obama/Tea Party movement. The country was less polarized then.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2016, 11:56:52 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
That was pre-Obama/Tea Party movement. The country was less polarized then.

And Thompson (back then) was not Johnson.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2016, 12:25:54 PM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
That was pre-Obama/Tea Party movement. The country was less polarized then.
And Thompson (back then) was not Johnson.
I will also add that the 2004 Senate race had a nasty, divisive Republican primary between several weak candidates. And the Repjublican candidates against Kohl in 1994, 2000, and 2006 were not serious. I don't know why the Republicans never put up any (real) candidate against Kohl.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,801
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2016, 02:54:17 PM »

Feingold will win 55℅
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2016, 03:02:28 PM »

When Feingold reenters the Senate, I bet that he'll quickly regain relevancy and will be as important to national Progressives as Warren and Sanders.
And the 98-2 capitalist majority will shrink to 97-3.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,578
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2016, 03:11:32 PM »

When Feingold reenters the Senate, I bet that he'll quickly regain relevancy and will be as important to national Progressives as Warren and Sanders.
And the 98-2 capitalist majority will shrink to 97-3.

96-4 actually, Merkley is a socialist by association
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,391
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2016, 03:50:08 PM »

When Feingold reenters the Senate, I bet that he'll quickly regain relevancy and will be as important to national Progressives as Warren and Sanders.

In many respects Feingold (and Wellstone RIP) were the original "true left" Democrats of the post-Reagan era.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,554
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2016, 11:35:06 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
That was pre-Obama/Tea Party movement. The country was less polarized then.
And Thompson (back then) was not Johnson.
I will also add that the 2004 Senate race had a nasty, divisive Republican primary between several weak candidates. And the Repjublican candidates against Kohl in 1994, 2000, and 2006 were not serious. I don't know why the Republicans never put up any (real) candidate against Kohl.

Because he was well liked and couldn't be beaten. He won every county in the state in 2006.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2016, 11:39:27 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
That was pre-Obama/Tea Party movement. The country was less polarized then.
And Thompson (back then) was not Johnson.
I will also add that the 2004 Senate race had a nasty, divisive Republican primary between several weak candidates. And the Repjublican candidates against Kohl in 1994, 2000, and 2006 were not serious. I don't know why the Republicans never put up any (real) candidate against Kohl.

Because he was well liked and couldn't be beaten. He won every county in the state in 2006.
A serious, well-known, moderate Republican would have probably beat him in 1994. It also helps that 2006 was a massive Democratic wave. I will also note that looking at RCP, it was around this time of the year in 2012 when Tommy Thompson's small but consistent lead died, and Baldwin took the lead.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,554
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2016, 11:51:19 AM »

Wisconsin is too polarized for Johnson to lose by more than 10. Nice try, though.
Senate 2000, 2004, and 2006 beg to differ. Tommy Thompson won three of his five elections by over ten percent.
That was pre-Obama/Tea Party movement. The country was less polarized then.
And Thompson (back then) was not Johnson.
I will also add that the 2004 Senate race had a nasty, divisive Republican primary between several weak candidates. And the Repjublican candidates against Kohl in 1994, 2000, and 2006 were not serious. I don't know why the Republicans never put up any (real) candidate against Kohl.

Because he was well liked and couldn't be beaten. He won every county in the state in 2006.
A serious, well-known, moderate Republican would have probably beat him in 1994. It also helps that 2006 was a massive Democratic wave. I will also note that looking at RCP, it was around this time of the year in 2012 when Tommy Thompson's small but consistent lead died, and Baldwin took the lead.

Ask most Republicans and they never really had much bad to say about him. He owned the Bucks, helped keep them here. People generally liked him. He was liberal but not far left, maybe in 1994 he could have been beaten but not since.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 13 queries.