Reuters/Ipsos: (Most) States

[Ebsy]

Obvious disclaimer: JUNK!

http://www.reuters.com/statesofthenation/

[Ebsy]

State   Clinton   Trump
California   63%   26%
Illinois   56%   30%
Maryland   53%   29%
Massachusetts   53%   30%
New York   52%   30%
Connecticut 50%37%
Florida   49%   41%
North Carolina 47%45%
Missouri   46%   41%
New Jersey46%   33%
Pennsylvania 46%45%
Ohio           45%   39%
Virginia   45%   39%
Washington45%   33%
Delaware   44%   22%
Michigan   44%   43%
New Mexico44%   41%
Oregon   43%   39%
Colorado   42%   39%
Georgia   42%   46%
Minnesota   42%   34%
Iowa   41%   41%
Kentucky   41%   47%
New Hampshire   41%   39%
South Carolina   41%   50%
Arkansas   40%   45%
Montana   40%   47%
Nevada   40%   38%
Arizona   39%   47%
West Virginia 39%48%
Louisiana   38%   48%
Mississippi   38%   52%
Wisconsin   38%   37%
Kansas   37%   48%
Alabama   36%   55%
Indiana   36%   54%
Tennessee   36%   43%
Nebraska   35%   49%
Maine   33%   37%
Utah           33%   44%
Texas   32%   46%
Idaho   30%   44%
Oklahoma   29%   58%

[Ebsy]

As Missouri goes, so goes Wyoming

Wyoming, DC, North Dakota, South Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Alaska and Hawaii were all too small for a scientific sample apparently.

[Ebsy]

I hope no one enters this into the database.

Yeah that definitely was not my intent.

[Ebsy]

Clinton leading in Nebraska lmao.

[Ebsy]

And of course 538 adds them.

That's actually awful.

[Ebsy]

How does Reuters consistently manage to produce ridiculous results across the board?

[Ebsy]

How does Reuters consistently manage to produce ridiculous results across the board?

your hero 'Nate Silver(liberal)' rated it as A- Pollster



 

I think Nate Silver is rather stupid and said so multiple times this past year, but you were probably too busy unskewing polls with bogus Ohio voter registration numbers to be aware of that.

[Ebsy]

Their turnout model really is awful.