|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2020, 06:08:16 pm
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MO- PPP: Trump +3
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: MO- PPP: Trump +3  (Read 2518 times)
Fargobison
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,512


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 17, 2016, 10:35:51 am »

Trump 45
Clinton 42

http://www.protectmofamilies.com/images/15290/Aug2016MissouriPresidentResultsPPP_PMF.pdf
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,556


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2016, 10:36:38 am »

Sponsor is a pro-union org.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,558


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2016, 10:39:22 am »

Looks like they only asked a few questions though... and the Demos are rather R leaning.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,275
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2016, 10:39:25 am »

MO is fool's gold for Democrats.
Logged
heatcharger
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,413
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2016, 10:41:11 am »

Nice topline obviously, but why wouldn't they ask gubernatorial and Senate races? If Trump is only +3 that could be bad news for Blunt.
Logged
badgate
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2016, 10:41:39 am »
« Edited: August 17, 2016, 02:49:46 pm by badgate »

If it's between MO and TX, I say Texas.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2016, 10:46:23 am »

Fits almost perfectly with the 538 Nowcast so this is probably the state of the race in MO
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2016, 10:47:25 am »

Things must be going well for Koster, if this is the case. It's telling that Hillary is winning Florida by more than Trump is winning Missouri, lol.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2016, 10:49:01 am »

Man, I wish they would have polled the Senate race (and Governor too).  If it's competitive, a Clinton investment in the state would be worthwhile, even if there are juicier targets like Georgia.

Trump +3 sounds about right, and they even got a decently Repub friendly sample.
Logged
Nhoj
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,174
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2016, 10:58:20 am »

Shes only winning women by 2 in this and there are more undecided women. But that probably still leaves it at about trump 2.
Logged
Desroko
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 346
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 17, 2016, 10:59:06 am »


Almost certainly. The real question is whether Trump can be baited into spending on KC and STL. Neither market is cheap.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 17, 2016, 11:02:50 am »


Probably, though given a large enough national margin who knows what could happen. Regardless Clinton should only pay attention here to help out the Senate and Governor races.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 17, 2016, 11:03:45 am »

Always be leery of these PPP polls that are done for an advocacy group. It's not the same poll that PPP would normally do.  There would be other questions that PPP would have ran if it was their own poll.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,985


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 17, 2016, 11:04:52 am »

If nothing else, it bears very well for Koster.
Logged
darthpi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,812
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 17, 2016, 11:47:41 am »

Another poll that seems roughly consistent with a 7 or 8 point lead nationally for Hillary. I'll take it.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,230
Germany



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 17, 2016, 01:00:07 pm »

Trump seems to have a very big problem with these whites that have a college degree, who voted for Mitt four years ago. That's bringing him down in many solid red states.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,821
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2016, 01:26:54 pm »

Possibly attainable by Clinton .... especially if trump's new team makes his campaign more of a mockery than it was yesterday.
Logged
Pear Squad
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,739
United States


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2016, 01:27:56 pm »

Trump seems to have a very big problem with these whites that have a college degree, who voted for Mitt four years ago. That's bringing him down in many solid red states.

This isn't looking good.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 17, 2016, 02:26:57 pm »

Democrats paid PPP to skew this for them. Enough said.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,985


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2016, 02:30:12 pm »

Democrats paid PPP to skew this for them. Enough said.

Legitimately cannot tel if you're being serious
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2016, 02:31:37 pm »

PPP has too good of a reputation to skew their polls for their clients.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2016, 02:34:53 pm »

Democrats paid PPP to skew this for them. Enough said.

Legitimately cannot tel if you're being serious

This poll was paid for by a pro-union group, it's not normal PPP. That makes it an internal poll, which is basically 100% guranteed to be at least slightly skewed toward what the client wants to see. If the client sees what they want, they are more likely to hire the pollster again, so the pollster skews the poll sample or doesn't push undecideds, or both, to satisfy the client.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 17, 2016, 02:42:54 pm »

Democrats paid PPP to skew this for them. Enough said.

Legitimately cannot tel if you're being serious

This poll was paid for by a pro-union group, it's not normal PPP. That makes it an internal poll, which is basically 100% guranteed to be at least slightly skewed toward what the client wants to see. If the client sees what they want, they are more likely to hire the pollster again, so the pollster skews the poll sample or doesn't push undecideds, or both, to satisfy the client.
No, just no. 
Logged
darthpi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,812
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 17, 2016, 02:50:47 pm »

Democrats paid PPP to skew this for them. Enough said.

Legitimately cannot tel if you're being serious

This poll was paid for by a pro-union group, it's not normal PPP. That makes it an internal poll, which is basically 100% guranteed to be at least slightly skewed toward what the client wants to see. If the client sees what they want, they are more likely to hire the pollster again, so the pollster skews the poll sample or doesn't push undecideds, or both, to satisfy the client.

It's worth considering that possibility, but the fact that it is consistent with the last two polls from Missouri makes me think that there is a decent chance that it is at least close to correct.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2016, 03:33:37 pm »
« Edited: August 17, 2016, 03:35:24 pm by LittleBigPlanet »

Democrats paid PPP to skew this for them. Enough said.

Legitimately cannot tel if you're being serious

This poll was paid for by a pro-union group, it's not normal PPP. That makes it an internal poll, which is basically 100% guranteed to be at least slightly skewed toward what the client wants to see. If the client sees what they want, they are more likely to hire the pollster again, so the pollster skews the poll sample or doesn't push undecideds, or both, to satisfy the client.
No, just no.  
Of course PPP or any other pollsters does not skew the polls, but there is always a "but"...

The real problem with such polls that it is [usually] up to client to publish the poll or not. And of course, the client is much more likely to let publish those polls that look good for him than those that don't. That's why those polls are more often outliers than "regular" polls.

So it depends on pollsters policy.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.089 seconds with 15 queries.