People's Pundit Daily Tracking Poll Thread

[Seriously?]

It seems to be a right-wing shop just based on the columnists that they syndicate/use. However, they claim to be accurate.

Does anyone remember them from 2014?

Per their LinkedIn:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.linkedin.com/company/peoples-pundit-daily

It seems like their editor, Richard D. Barris, is a Tea Party member.

From what I can find, his analysis in the Republican cycle of 2014 was pretty much spot on, sans North Carolina Senate and Maryland governor (which no one saw). Obviously, that means he can nail a Republican-friendly cycle. Not sure if that means much of anything though.

http://www.teapartytribune.com/2014/08/17/ppds-2014-senate-projections-dont-bank-on-a-wave-and-gop-doesnt-need-one/

https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/news/politics/2014/11/06/ppds-big-debut-most-accurate-election-projection-model-of-2014-hands-down/

[Seriously?]

Today's numbers (Trump +3%)

Trump 46% (-1)
Clinton 43% (+1)
Johnson 5% (+1)
Stein 4% (--)
Undecided 2% (-1)

Decimals (Trump +2.8%)
Trump 45.9% (-.9%)
Clinton 43.1% (+.9%)
Johnson 5.1% (+1.1%)
Stein 4.3% (-.1%)
Undecided 1.6% (-1.0%)

[Seriously?]

Really? Are we going to post and keep updating every single thing that claims it's a poll? Even benchmark politics sacked this.

This particular group had a pretty good track record in 2014.

I am of the opinion that information is information. You can choose to filter it if you wish. If you look at the trendlines, Hillary! could very well be ahead in the next few days in this poll.

Then your tune will change, of course.

[Seriously?]

August 1 results
Trump 44.8% (-1.1%)
Clinton 43.3% (+.2%)
Johnson 5.9% (+.8%)
Stein 4.2% (-.1%)
Undecided 1.8% (+.2%)

Margin: Trump +1.5 (-1.3%)

[Seriously?]

As predicted, Hillary! takes the lead (ever so slightly)

8/2 Results
Clinton 44.1% (+.8%)
Trump 43.9% (-.9%)
Johnson 4.9 (-1.0%)
Stein 4.1% (-.1%)
Undecided 3.0% (+1.2%)

[Seriously?]

Reading their articles, this seems like an extreme Republican hack website.

This daily tracker should be deleted.

A data point is a data point as far as I am concerned. I very well know where the source came from and to take it with the requisite amount of skepticism.

These guys may tilt Republican, but their track record in 2014 was nothing to sneeze at. They got everything but North Carolina Senate and Maryland governor correct.

[Seriously?]

8/3 Results
Clinton 44.3% (+.2%)
Trump 43.8% (-.1%)
Johnson 4.9 (+0.1%)
Stein 4.3% (-.2%)
Undecided 2.6% (-.4%)

[Seriously?]

8/4 Results
Clinton 45.1% (+.8%)
Trump 43.5% (-.3%)
Johnson 6.3 (+1.4%)
Stein 3.1% (-1.2%)
Undecided 1.9% (-.7%)

[Seriously?]

8/5 Results Clinton +1.7%
Clinton 45.3% (+.2%)
Trump 43.6% (+.1%)
Johnson 5.9 (-.5%)
Stein 3.2% (+.1%)
Undecided 2.0% (+.1%)

8/6 Results Clinton +3.5
Clinton 46.1% (+.8%)
Trump 42.6% (-1.0%)
Johnson 6.1 (+.2%)
Stein 3.1% (-.1%)
Undecided 2.1% (+.1%)

[Seriously?]

8/7 Results Clinton +5.9
Clinton 47.3% (+1.2%)
Trump 41.4% (-1.2%)
Johnson 6.3 (+.2%)
Stein 3.3% (+.2%)
Undecided 1.7% (-.4%)

[Seriously?]

8/8 Results Clinton +5.7
Clinton 46.9% (1.4%)
Trump 41.2% (-.2%)
Johnson 6.8 (+.5%)
Stein 4.0% (+.7%)
Undecided 1.1% (-.6%)

[Seriously?]

8/7 Results Clinton +5.9
Clinton 47.3% (+1.2%)
Trump 41.4% (-1.2%)
Johnson 6.3 (+.2%)
Stein 3.3% (+.2%)
Undecided 1.7% (-.4%)

Live look at Seriously updating this Breitbart-lite poll:

Numbers are numbers. Or do you not want all the information that is publicly available because you do not like the source. Daily trackers are used mainly for trendlines. This poll's trendlines are in lock-step with most of the other polls out there.

If this particular source were biased as you claim it to be, Hillary! would not be in the lead.

[Seriously?]

8/9 Results Clinton +3.8
Clinton 44.9% (-2.0%)
Trump 41.1% (-.1%) (likely typo, claim 41.9%)
Johnson 8.1 (+1.3%)
Stein 3.9% (-.1%)
Undecided 2.0% (+.9%)

[Seriously?]

I've never seen such glorious junk in my life!

also dude have you ever heard of outliers?

Yes. Have you heard of the entire universe of available information? We post Zog-piss nonsense on this board. There's really no harm with another data point.

I am taking this particular poll with the requisite grain of salt. Just because I post and keep track of something doesn't mean I endorse it. The numbers fall where the numbers fall at the end of the day.

[Seriously?]

8/10 Results Clinton +3.6
Clinton 44.5% (-0.4%)
Trump 40.9% (-0.2%)
Johnson 8.4% (+0.3%)
Stein 3.7% (-0.2%)
Undecided 2.5% (+0.5%)

[Seriously?]

8/11 Results Clinton +2.0
Clinton 43.2% (-1.3%)
Trump 41.2% (+0.3%)
Johnson 8.6% (+0.2%)
Stein 3.5% (-0.2%)
Undecided 3.5% (+1.0%)

[Seriously?]

8/13 Results Clinton +4.6%
Clinton 44.9% (+1.6%)
Trump 40.3% (-0.8%)
Johnson 8.9% (-0.6%)
Stein 4.1% (+0.2%)
Undecided 1.8% (-1.3%)

[Seriously?]

8/14 Results Clinton +3.0%
Clinton 43.5% (-1.4%)
Trump 40.5% (+0.2%)
Johnson 8.7% (-0.2%)
Stein 3.5% (-0.6%)
Undecided 3.8% (+2.0%)

Catching up for lack of releases during the weekend.

[Seriously?]

8/15 Results Clinton +2.3%
Clinton 42.2% (-1.3%)
Trump 39.9% (-0.6%)
Johnson 9.8% (+1.1%)
Stein 4.1% (+0.6%)
Undecided 4.0% (+0.2%)

[Seriously?]

8/16 Results Clinton +1.6%
Clinton 41.8% (-0.4%)
Trump 40.2% (+0.3%)
Johnson 9.2% (-0.6%)
Stein 4.3% (+0.2%)
Undecided 4.5% (+0.5%)

[Seriously?]

8/17 Results Clinton +1.1%
Clinton 41.1% (-0.7%)
Trump 40.0% (-0.2%)
Johnson 9.6% (+0.4%)
Stein 3.7% (-0.6%)
Undecided 5.6% (+0.9%)

[Seriously?]

8/18 Results Clinton +1.2%
Clinton 42.5% (+1.4%)
Trump 41.3% (+1.3%)
Johnson 8.1% (-1.5%)
Stein 3.1% (-0.6%)
Undecided 5.0% (-0.6%)

[Seriously?]

8/19 Results Clinton +0.6%
Clinton 42.1% (-0.4%)
Trump 41.5% (+0.2%)
Johnson 7.9% (-0.2%)
Stein 3.3% (+0.2%)
Undecided 5.2% (+0.2%)

[Seriously?]

8/20 Results Trump +0.9%
Trump 42.9% (+1.4%)
Clinton 42.0% (-0.1%)
Johnson 7.1% (-0.8%)
Stein 3.5% (+0.2%)
Undecided 4.5% (-0.7%)

Trump back in the lead for the first time since August 1.

[Seriously?]

8/21 Results Trump +1.4%
Trump 43.1% (+0.2%)
Clinton 41.7% (-0.3%)
Johnson 7.2% (+0.1%)
Stein 2.9% (-0.6%)
Undecided 5.1% (+0.6%)