|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2020, 09:00:49 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MRG - MI: Clinton +5
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MRG - MI: Clinton +5  (Read 1447 times)
AOC Stan
dfwlibertylover
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,529
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 18, 2016, 05:19:26 pm »

MRG polls Michigan for the Presidential race.

Clinton - 34
Trump - 29
Johnson - 3
Stein - 2
Undecided - 23
http://mrgmi.com/2016/07/michigan-poll-trump-trails-clinton-by-five-percent-heading-into-gop-convention/
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2016, 05:21:02 pm »

Both candidates below 35 lmao. Right in the trash.
Logged
AOC Stan
dfwlibertylover
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,529
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2016, 05:23:41 pm »

Both candidates below 35 lmao. Right in the trash.
actually the 3rd poll since May in MI to show at least one below 35.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,256


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2016, 05:26:04 pm »

The Michigan-only pollsters have to be the saddest lot of pollsters in the country.  Michigan has a lot of them.  It could be a case where having more data isn't better.
Logged
Buh her emails!
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2016, 06:34:04 pm »

Dem undecideds tho
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.63, S: -6.13

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2016, 06:40:36 pm »

#ClintonUnder35
#TrumpUnder30
#SteinAbove1
Logged
nfrstan12
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,999
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: 0.35

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2016, 06:46:23 pm »

At least they got Johnson right.
Logged
Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 1.22

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2016, 11:28:02 pm »

Yeah, Michigan is a Toss-Up.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,501
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2016, 11:30:18 pm »

No poll from the Michigan Polling Industry will be taken seriously.

MI will not be a toss up.
Logged
Redban
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 846


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2016, 08:24:16 am »

No poll from the Michigan Polling Industry will be taken seriously.

MI will not be a toss up.

In 2012, Romney suffered from "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt!"; and in 2008, McCain was close to Obama before the economic collapse, which hurt the auto industry significantly. Before 2008, Michigan was a legitimate toss-up (see 2004).

Why, thus, do you brashly say that "MI will not be a toss up"?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,503
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2016, 08:47:50 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2016, 08:49:51 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,503
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2016, 08:51:32 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 

I have no problem with accepting that she beat Sanders in the primaries.

I didn't like her before that. I virtually never liked her and she remains a terrible candidate and I will keep on repeating that she's a trainwreck.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2016, 08:55:50 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 

I have no problem with accepting that she beat Sanders in the primaries.

I didn't like her before that. I virtually never liked her and she remains a terrible candidate and I will keep on repeating that she's a trainwreck.
Do what you want.  At this point, I just assume your unquenchable hatred of her is because she's an unattractive woman who has made it far in politics, and that grinds your gears.  Seeing as you and many on this forum have made not only creepy but sexist remarks regarding many women in politics.
Logged
Beat-‘Em-All Beto
Clinton1996
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2016, 08:59:56 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 

I have no problem with accepting that she beat Sanders in the primaries.

I didn't like her before that. I virtually never liked her and she remains a terrible candidate and I will keep on repeating that she's a trainwreck.
Do what you want.  At this point, I just assume your unquenchable hatred of her is because she's an unattractive woman who has made it far in politics, and that grinds your gears.  Seeing as you and many on this forum have made not only creepy but sexist remarks regarding many women in politics.
Well that escalated quickly
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2016, 09:01:25 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 

I have no problem with accepting that she beat Sanders in the primaries.

I didn't like her before that. I virtually never liked her and she remains a terrible candidate and I will keep on repeating that she's a trainwreck.
Do what you want.  At this point, I just assume your unquenchable hatred of her is because she's an unattractive woman who has made it far in politics, and that grinds your gears.  Seeing as you and many on this forum have made not only creepy but sexist remarks regarding many women in politics.
Well that escalated quickly
Eh, could have been worse. 

Also it was more directed at the people on the forum who are extremely creepy when it comes to women, which is larger than I would like.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,503
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2016, 09:06:44 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 

I have no problem with accepting that she beat Sanders in the primaries.

I didn't like her before that. I virtually never liked her and she remains a terrible candidate and I will keep on repeating that she's a trainwreck.
Do what you want.  At this point, I just assume your unquenchable hatred of her is because she's an unattractive woman who has made it far in politics, and that grinds your gears.  Seeing as you and many on this forum have made not only creepy but sexist remarks regarding many women in politics.

Ehh, no. It doesn't have to do with her looks or something. It's simply she and her off-putting personality. There are simply much more likeable women out who'd be better qualfied than her as President. For example, I don't know if you know it or not, I used to like Merkel a few years ago (until she made that silly u-turn and welcomed the whole world to Germany and Europe with it). But other than that, my dislike of Hillary is not much different than my dislike of Putin or Erdogan (but I hate them more). So, nothing to do with gender ...
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2016, 09:07:30 am »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 

I have no problem with accepting that she beat Sanders in the primaries.

I didn't like her before that. I virtually never liked her and she remains a terrible candidate and I will keep on repeating that she's a trainwreck.
Do what you want.  At this point, I just assume your unquenchable hatred of her is because she's an unattractive woman who has made it far in politics, and that grinds your gears.  Seeing as you and many on this forum have made not only creepy but sexist remarks regarding many women in politics.

Ehh, no. It doesn't have to do with her looks or something. It's simply she and her off-putting personality. There are simply much more likeable women out who'd be better qualfied than her as President. For example, I don't know if you know it or not, I used to like Merkel a few years ago (until she made that silly u-turn and welcomed the whole world to Germany and Europe with it).
That's where I think your wrong.  You don't have to be some bubbly personality to President.  And to say otherwise is a great reflection of your world view.  I won't respond to the second part, seeing as I don't want to get into a debate about racism in Germany and the like.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,532
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2016, 09:43:25 am »


Because she leads by 5 points in a junk poll?!? Please! A swing-state sure, but this ain't no toss-up.
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,648
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2016, 04:11:59 pm »

I agree that MI "could" indeed be a toss-up.

2008 and 2012 might have been exceptional, with Obama on the ballot.

With the "fighter for the car industry" off the ballot, it could become closer because Hillary is a terrible candidate. Unless she deploys Obama to the state a few times ...
Tender can you stop this Hillary is a terrible candidate sh**t.  It gets old quickly.  Leave you damn partisanship in the past and get over the fact that your candidate lost fair and square by a large margin. 
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,501
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2016, 06:35:11 pm »


Because she leads by 5 points in a junk poll?!? Please! A swing-state sure, but this ain't no toss-up.

Yup. That's my view.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.447 seconds with 15 queries.