Was Reaganomics beneficial to the USA Econamy long term? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:13:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Was Reaganomics beneficial to the USA Econamy long term? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: -
#1
Yes (R)
 
#2
No (R)
 
#3
Yes(D)
 
#4
No(D)
 
#5
Yes(Ind/Oth)
 
#6
No(Ind/Oth)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Was Reaganomics beneficial to the USA Econamy long term?  (Read 2836 times)
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,933
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: July 17, 2016, 05:39:01 PM »

Yes because , up till Reagan was president , the people saw more regulation on business a good things, were willing to pay more in federal taxes so government had more money to spend. Then Reaganomics led to a 20 year boom
This is so inaccurate I don't even know where to begin.

Reaganomics was a net negative on America, not so much for its direct effects, but for encouraging all sorts of anti-intellectual, anti-government people to get into government for the sole purpose of destroying it. I believe that the Democrats had gone too far in the expansion of the state, but Reaganomics was not the required prescription.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,933
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2016, 11:59:15 PM »

Yes because , up till Reagan was president , the people saw more regulation on business a good things, were willing to pay more in federal taxes so government had more money to spend. Then Reaganomics led to a 20 year boom
This is so inaccurate I don't even know where to begin.

Reaganomics was a net negative on America, not so much for its direct effects, but for encouraging all sorts of anti-intellectual, anti-government people to get into government for the sole purpose of destroying it. I believe that the Democrats had gone too far in the expansion of the state, but Reaganomics was not the required prescription.

if you believe Reagan was a bad president you shouldn't be a republican
I worship God, not Ronald Reagan. The Republican Party should start doing the same.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.