USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:55:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2  (Read 84457 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« on: July 24, 2016, 02:20:02 PM »

USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/23):
Trump - 45 (+1)
Clinton - 42 (+/-)
(#) denotes change from previous day

Anyone have a demographic breakdown?
No, I can't find any

Well if they are accurate then it is scary for Democrats because the RNC by any objective opinion was a disaster.

Did you really expect for Trump not to get at least a small bump from his convention?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2016, 02:16:56 AM »

USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/29):
Trump - 47 (+/-)
Clinton - 42 (+1)
(#) denotes change from previous day

Movin' On Up!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2016, 08:29:50 AM »
« Edited: August 12, 2016, 08:31:27 AM by Gass3268 »

In 538's polls-only forecast, they adjust this poll to usually 5 points more for Clinton.

Yup, when she was up by about 4 hear they did reduce that down to a 4 point addition. Today it's only a 3 point addition. I wonder what their methodology is here.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2016, 02:15:59 PM »

Any move back to 'pre convention' polling would still give Clinton an Obama 2012 style victory.

Really if you look at the current polling averages, Clinton is back to her post-primary/pre-Commey numbers of around a 6-5% lead. Pre-convention numbers were not that great for Clinton, she was around 3-4%.

As long as we keep hearing stories of GOP officials in NC and PA freaking out about their own internal polls showing double digit deficits and RNC rumblings of having congressional running ads that say they will be a check on a President Clinton, I'm not worried.  
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2016, 07:34:37 AM »

No update?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2016, 05:19:57 AM »

Why did Seriously? come back this year? Wasn't he embarrassed enough in 2012?

Well, someone ought to play the role of poll-truther now that JJ and krazey left Atlas.

JJ is actually back.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2016, 11:54:38 AM »

Exhibit A why this poll is junk:

One 19-Year-Old Illinois Man Is Distorting National Polling Averages
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2016, 11:58:59 AM »


Nate Cohn ‏@Nate_Cohn  2m2 minutes ago Washington, DC
If the USC/LAT poll were weighted normally, Clinton lead. Instead, a 19 year old black Trump voter is weighted 30x

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/786248405227941888

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This poll is trash!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2016, 10:43:30 PM »

CNN's Smerconish (I hope I spelled that right) was nothing this morning that this poll has a history of being right and that it could prove to be the real winner in this election

Smerconish is dumb because this poll has never existed until this year. What they do is they weight their results to match previous election results, which is an extremely dubious practice because real Romney voters may not say they voted for him or maybe even say they voted for Obama, which means they overweight Romney voters and underweight real Obama voters.

It was built with help by the RAND people, but the actual RAND poll this year currently has Clinton +10.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.