USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2
Talk Elections
Forum
Contact
|
US Election Atlas
Election 2020
Election Results
Election Info
Atlas Wiki
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
April 10, 2021, 10:41:33 PM
Talk Elections
Election Archive
Election Archive
2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
[
6
]
7
8
9
10
11
...
30
Author
Topic: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2 (Read 67148 times)
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
Posts: 4,501
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #125 on:
July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM »
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
Posts: 739
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #126 on:
July 29, 2016, 09:21:28 AM »
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
"It's a sham because I don't believe assumptions X, Y, and Z" reeks of "unskewing". I'm not prepared to make such a bold statement about any poll just yet.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
Posts: 4,501
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #127 on:
July 29, 2016, 09:40:07 AM »
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
"It's a sham because I don't believe assumptions X, Y, and Z" reeks of "unskewing". I'm not prepared to make such a bold statement about any poll just yet.
No, because they won't release the cross tables of the poll. Why should I trust something just based on the numbers without seeing who they are polling.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,530
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/28 - Trump +6
«
Reply #128 on:
July 29, 2016, 10:10:05 AM »
If you
decimals, it's Trump 46.7, Clinton 40.6,
Logged
PaperKooper
Jr. Member
Posts: 831
Political Matrix
E: 5.23, S: 5.57
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #129 on:
July 29, 2016, 12:51:22 PM »
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:40:07 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
"It's a sham because I don't believe assumptions X, Y, and Z" reeks of "unskewing". I'm not prepared to make such a bold statement about any poll just yet.
No, because they won't release the cross tables of the poll. Why should I trust something just based on the numbers without seeing who they are polling.
The "detailed data" tab has sample sizes.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
Posts: 739
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #130 on:
July 29, 2016, 02:16:54 PM »
Quote from: PaperKooper on July 29, 2016, 12:51:22 PM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:40:07 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
"It's a sham because I don't believe assumptions X, Y, and Z" reeks of "unskewing". I'm not prepared to make such a bold statement about any poll just yet.
No, because they won't release the cross tables of the poll. Why should I trust something just based on the numbers without seeing who they are polling.
The "detailed data" tab has sample sizes.
Yeah I pretty much tuned out of the conversation when he said that...
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
Posts: 4,501
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/28 - Trump +6
«
Reply #131 on:
July 29, 2016, 02:18:58 PM »
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 02:16:54 PM
Quote from: PaperKooper on July 29, 2016, 12:51:22 PM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:40:07 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
"It's a sham because I don't believe assumptions X, Y, and Z" reeks of "unskewing". I'm not prepared to make such a bold statement about any poll just yet.
No, because they won't release the cross tables of the poll. Why should I trust something just based on the numbers without seeing who they are polling.
The "detailed data" tab has sample sizes.
Yeah I pretty much tuned out of the conversation when he said that...
At this point, you seem like an idiot who wants to believe this damn poll. So, I'll leave you in your "poll".
Also, they didn't have that when I first looked at this poll and threw it in the garbage. Havent looked since. But think what you want to think.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
Posts: 3,646
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/28 - Trump +6
«
Reply #132 on:
July 29, 2016, 02:36:24 PM »
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 02:18:58 PM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 02:16:54 PM
Quote from: PaperKooper on July 29, 2016, 12:51:22 PM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:40:07 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:19:25 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Not really. It is a sham compared to what they had four years ago. Shouldn't have launched it until after the conventions at the least.
"It's a sham because I don't believe assumptions X, Y, and Z" reeks of "unskewing". I'm not prepared to make such a bold statement about any poll just yet.
No, because they won't release the cross tables of the poll. Why should I trust something just based on the numbers without seeing who they are polling.
The "detailed data" tab has sample sizes.
Yeah I pretty much tuned out of the conversation when he said that...
At this point, you seem like an idiot who wants to believe this damn poll. So, I'll leave you in your "poll".
Also, they didn't have that when I first looked at this poll and threw it in the garbage. Havent looked since. But think what you want to think.
So you threw it in the garbage, because they
did't
have it [at the very start], but now, when they
do
have it, you don't care.
Ok!
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,998
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/28 - Trump +6
«
Reply #133 on:
July 30, 2016, 02:14:55 AM »
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/29):
Trump - 47 (+/-)
Clinton - 42 (+1)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
Posts: 25,007
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/28 - Trump +6
«
Reply #134 on:
July 30, 2016, 02:16:56 AM »
Quote from: dfwlibertylover on July 30, 2016, 02:14:55 AM
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/29):
Trump - 47 (+/-)
Clinton - 42 (+1)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Movin' On Up!
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,998
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/28 - Trump +6
«
Reply #135 on:
July 30, 2016, 04:14:24 AM »
Quote from: Gass3268 on July 30, 2016, 02:16:56 AM
Quote from: dfwlibertylover on July 30, 2016, 02:14:55 AM
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/29):
Trump - 47 (+/-)
Clinton - 42 (+1)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Movin' On Up!
I believe this will put Clinton in the lead on the RCP national head to head average unless another poll comes out today that shows good results for trump.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,530
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #136 on:
July 30, 2016, 11:05:02 AM »
Trump 46.6, Clinton 41.7, for those who
decimals.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Icon
Posts: 16,206
Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -5.20
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #137 on:
July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM »
They're doing a poll every day now?
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,052
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #138 on:
July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM »
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Icon
Posts: 16,206
Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -5.20
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #139 on:
July 30, 2016, 12:02:51 PM »
Quote from: Arch on July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
LA Times? Why? Because TRUMP is leading?
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
Posts: 3,646
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #140 on:
July 30, 2016, 12:07:33 PM »
Quote from: Arch on July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
No
Logged
Flake
Flo
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 8,695
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #141 on:
July 30, 2016, 12:54:40 PM »
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:02:51 PM
Quote from: Arch on July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
LA Times? Why? Because TRUMP is leading?
Well the poll is contradicting nearly every other poll taken since it became a Clinton/Trump election and the demographics of the United States just wouldn't allow for a Trump margin to be this large.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
Posts: 739
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #142 on:
July 30, 2016, 01:18:57 PM »
Quote from: Flo on July 30, 2016, 12:54:40 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:02:51 PM
Quote from: Arch on July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
LA Times? Why? Because TRUMP is leading?
Well the poll is contradicting nearly every other poll taken since it became a Clinton/Trump election and the demographics of the United States just wouldn't allow for a Trump margin to be this large.
There seems to be a pretty substantial R bias in their sample, but the trends seem reasonable if you account for the lag (it's a 7-day running average, so the "7/29" number is an average of 7/23-7/29).
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
Posts: 4,540
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #143 on:
July 30, 2016, 01:23:17 PM »
So basically Clinton's bounce is 2 points so far, and we've got another 6 days before they completely capture the bounce.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
Posts: 739
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #144 on:
July 30, 2016, 01:26:35 PM »
Quote from: Mehmentum on July 30, 2016, 01:23:17 PM
So basically Clinton's bounce is 2 points so far, and we've got another 6 days before they completely capture the bounce.
Yep. Trump's full bounce wasn't registered until 6 days after the
end
of the RNC. That suggests Clinton's will have to wait 'til the 7/28-8/3 number released on August 4th.
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
Posts: 3,646
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #145 on:
July 30, 2016, 02:38:25 PM »
Quote from: Mallow on July 30, 2016, 01:18:57 PM
Quote from: Flo on July 30, 2016, 12:54:40 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:02:51 PM
Quote from: Arch on July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
LA Times? Why? Because TRUMP is leading?
Well the poll is contradicting nearly every other poll taken since it became a Clinton/Trump election and the demographics of the United States just wouldn't allow for a Trump margin to be this large.
There seems to be a pretty substantial R bias in their sample, but the trends seem reasonable if you account for the lag (it's a 7-day running average, so the "7/29" number is an average of 7/23-7/29).
Yes. Trends!
Quote from: Mallow on July 30, 2016, 01:26:35 PM
Quote from: Mehmentum on July 30, 2016, 01:23:17 PM
So basically Clinton's bounce is 2 points so far, and we've got another 6 days before they completely capture the bounce.
Yep. Trump's full bounce wasn't registered until 6 days after the
end
of the RNC. That suggests Clinton's will have to wait 'til the 7/28-8/3 number released on August 4th.
Yes. We can actually calculate, what the last day
approximately
shows (~ 300 sample):
Trump today:
(6*46.7 + Trump*1)/7 = 46.6 (7 day rolling)
=>
Trump
= 46.6*7 - 6*46.7 =
46%
Clinton today:
(6*40.6 + Clinton*1)/7 = 41.7 (7 day rolling)
=>
Clinton
= 7*41.7 - 6*40.6 =
48.3%
But since the sample is so small (~300) the MOE is YUUUGE!
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
Posts: 4,540
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #146 on:
July 30, 2016, 02:46:24 PM »
Quote from: LittleBigPlanet on July 30, 2016, 02:38:25 PM
Quote from: Mallow on July 30, 2016, 01:18:57 PM
Quote from: Flo on July 30, 2016, 12:54:40 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:02:51 PM
Quote from: Arch on July 30, 2016, 12:02:20 PM
Quote from: President Johnson on July 30, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
They're doing a poll every day now?
This poll is trash
LA Times? Why? Because TRUMP is leading?
Well the poll is contradicting nearly every other poll taken since it became a Clinton/Trump election and the demographics of the United States just wouldn't allow for a Trump margin to be this large.
There seems to be a pretty substantial R bias in their sample, but the trends seem reasonable if you account for the lag (it's a 7-day running average, so the "7/29" number is an average of 7/23-7/29).
Yes. Trends!
Quote from: Mallow on July 30, 2016, 01:26:35 PM
Quote from: Mehmentum on July 30, 2016, 01:23:17 PM
So basically Clinton's bounce is 2 points so far, and we've got another 6 days before they completely capture the bounce.
Yep. Trump's full bounce wasn't registered until 6 days after the
end
of the RNC. That suggests Clinton's will have to wait 'til the 7/28-8/3 number released on August 4th.
Yes. We can actually calculate, what the last day
approximately
shows (~ 300 sample):
Trump today:
(6*46.7 + Trump*1)/7 = 46.6 (7 day rolling)
=>
Trump
= 46.6*7 - 6*46.7 =
46%
Clinton today:
(6*40.6 + Clinton*1)/7 = 41.7 (7 day rolling)
=>
Clinton
= 7*41.7 - 6*40.6 =
48.3%
But since the sample is so small (~300) the MOE is YUUUGE!
Interesting, that would be a 9 point bounce, right in line with RABA.
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
Posts: 4,048
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #147 on:
July 30, 2016, 03:27:04 PM »
Using the LittleBigPlanet's equation above, I bring you yesterday's demographics.
Age
18-34: 51.2 Clinton, 42.3 Trump
35-64: 48.7 Trump, 45.5 Clinton
65+: 52.2 Clinton, 45.1 Trump
Education
HS or less: 54.6 Trump, 40.4 Clinton
some college: 53.2 Trump, 43.7 Clinton
BA+: 61.3 Clinton, 29.8 Trump
Household Income
$0-35k: 48.6 Clinton, 42.9 Trump
$35-75k: 50.5 Trump, 41.8 Clinton
$75k+: 52.3 Clinton, 43.5 Trump
Race
White: 55.2 Trump, 39 Clinton
African American: 89.1 Clinton, 2.3 Trump
Other ethnicity: 48.3 Trump, 45.9 Clinton
Hispanic: 64.6 Clinton, 35.4 Trump
Gender
Female: 50 Clinton, 46.9 Trump
Male: 46.9 Clinton, 45.4 Trump
But with a 300ish sample size, the margins of error are monstrous. That's what any abnormalities can be contributed to, FTR.
Logged
Monstro Believed in a Blue Georgia (and a Blue Texas)
Interlocutor
YaBB God
Posts: 4,711
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #148 on:
July 31, 2016, 02:12:24 AM »
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/30):
Trump - 46.1 (-.5)
Clinton - 41.9 (+.2)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Logged
Soonerdem
Rookie
Posts: 95
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/29 - Trump +5
«
Reply #149 on:
July 31, 2016, 08:22:17 PM »
Quote from: Interlocutor on July 31, 2016, 02:12:24 AM
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/30):
Trump - 46.1 (-.5)
Clinton - 41.9 (+.2)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Smaller change then you would expect
Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
[
6
]
7
8
9
10
11
...
30
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Polling
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/State Elections
===> 2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2022 Senate & House Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
About this Site
-----------------------------
===> How To
=> The Atlas
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> Election Archive
===> 2018 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2014 House Election Polls
=====> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 Elections
=====> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2012 House Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Elections
=====> 2010 House Election Polls
=====> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Elections
=====> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2006 Elections
=====> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> 2020 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2020 Senate & House Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliament
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Terms of Service
-
DMCA Agent and Policy
-
Privacy Policy and Cookies
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 13 queries.
Loading...