FL/OH/PA Quinnipiac: Rubio +13, Portman +7, Toomey +10

[Maxwell]

Patrick Murphy is a horrible candidate.

I'm coming to this conclusion too - can barely break out the gate against a candidate as unlikable as Alan Grayson with all of the support from the  Democratic establishment in the world. Unfortunately, Rubio is probably fine.

And I think Hillary has to win by at least 6 in order for McGinty to win. She's also a weak recruit who barely came out of the primary with all of the national democrat support in the world.

Here's a question - why did National Dems sh**t the bed so hard in a very winnable year? (I assume Evan Bayh's decision was his own, considering how much disdain he seems to have for National Democrats).

[Maxwell]

Patrick Murphy is a horrible candidate.

I'm coming to this conclusion too - can barely break out the gate against a candidate as unlikable as Alan Grayson with all of the support from the  Democratic establishment in the world. Unfortunately, Rubio is probably fine.

And I think Hillary has to win by at least 6 in order for McGinty to win. She's also a weak recruit who barely came out of the primary with all of the national democrat support in the world.

Here's a question - why did National Dems sh**t the bed so hard in a very winnable year? (I assume Evan Bayh's decision was his own, considering how much disdain he seems to have for National Democrats).

>drawing broad based conclusions based off a Quinnipiac poll

Gov. Beauprez agrees with your analysis!

And before anyone says "the poll could've been true at the time!!1!!", that's a big fat nope.

Quinnipiac has a notably terrible record in the state of Colorado. I'm not sure how it did in other states.

But there's been a consistent trend of Toomey running 5 points ahead of the Republican Presidential ticket, whether its this Republican leaning outlier or the other Democratic leaning outlier.