Clinton disqualified herself

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Clinton supporters are in no way leftists, the are liberals.

Unlike in Europe, according to American terminology, "liberalism" pretty much equates the left side of the political spectrum.

[egalitt]

If someone wishes to explore the origins of anti-Russian attitudes I would recommend Guy Mettan's book  https://www.rt.com/op-edge/262233-russophobia-guy-mettan-book/

[ProudModerate2]

Clinton supporters are in no way leftists, the are liberals. And liberals all over the world hate Russia (including those ones who rule Russia now). Hatred to Russia   is one of their main  idiological postulates. I know it from my experience on this forum  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=233957.msg5010871#msg5010871

And I guess you think that conservatives "all over the world" LOVE Russia ?
Or conservatives in the USA love Russia ?
LOL.

Too primitive a conclusion. What are conservatives? The British conservatives from the Conservative Party , e. g.  hate Russia in the same way as the liberals.  In Poland anti-Russian ideology has been shared by all parties irrespective of their names. Attitudes to Russia vary from contry to country.
Clinton is sure to hate my country because  dealing with Russia she displayed stupidity and incompetence as I wrote earlier.

Yes of course.
And Putin never displays stupidity and incompetence.
Like when Russia annexed Crimea, and then Putin and your government told the world that 99% of the people in Crimea favored the land grab .... I mean "annexation."
If the Russian people swallowed that garbage, who is it that is really "stupid and incompetent" ?

Stupid and incompetent are those ones who don't believe the referendum  results and fabricate the results. 96.77% of referendum participants (rather than 99% as you state) supported Crimea's unification with Russia. You can find this figure in Wiki.
You can travel to Crimea to find out that the figure is true.

According to Yale historian Timothy Snyder, the Russian government invited individuals belonging to European far-right, anti-semitic and neo-Nazi parties to serve as observers. At least some of the international observers were managed and financed by the Eurasian Observatory for Democracy & Elections (EODE), a far-right non-governmental Russia-based self-proclaimed election monitoring organization.

Shaun Walker from The Guardian reported that during a press conference on the eve of the referendum, some of the aforementioned observers "went on political rants against U.S. hegemony in the world", describing the press conference as "rather bizarre".

[egalitt]

I don't care a hug for observers. I know for sure that all people there support unification with Russia.

[egalitt]

Another interesting piece of news  http://www.westernjournalism.com/witness-email-probe-seen-leaving-clintons-house-day-met-fbi/

Clinton met privately with a witness for FBI investigation.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Here is an interesting article : http://my.chicagotribune.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-87802959/
If Clinton is elected the nation proves it is corrupt.

Didn't you guys elect Vladimir Putin elected in a landslide?

This forum  is aimed at discussion of the presidential election in the USA rather than in Russia.

You have to love how the Dems here don't like opinions of anyone but their own.  It's systemic in the left here in the US.  Hard to have a real logical discussion without summary dismissal of any point because "oh, ha the source is RT/Breitbart/writer I don't like/foreigner so this is garbage!". 

I think the left actually likes RT because they're anti-American.

Maybe the idiot left. I think most reasonable progressives recognize it as literally Russian propaganda.

Ironically, they are one of the few that give some decent coverage to third parties in the US. I'd say their Russia coverage is pro-state but internationally they are only less balanced than Al-Jazeera.  But people probably don't like Al-Jazeera here either because TERRRIRIRSSTTS.

Pretty much. RT is total bullsh**t propaganda when they cover Russia, but they're easily one of the best media outlets for covering the US (when not specifically having to do with Russia).

Well, it is easy to supply fascinating TV when youvare not constrained by reality, and, for somebody like you, who is not concerned with reality, fake news must be fun. The rest of us, I am afraid, will cojtinue preferring sources of actual news.

RT hardly has a monopoly on fake news.

[Ebsy]

Another interesting piece of news  http://www.westernjournalism.com/witness-email-probe-seen-leaving-clintons-house-day-met-fbi/

Clinton met privately with a witness for FBI investigation.

Cheryl Mills primary role is not as a witness for a now ended FBI investigation, you know. There is literally nothing remarkable about the former Secretary of State and her former Chief of Staff meeting "privately". I really don't understand this pathetic desire to create scandal where there obviously is none. I guess Putin must pay pretty well.

[egalitt]

Another interesting piece of news  http://www.westernjournalism.com/witness-email-probe-seen-leaving-clintons-house-day-met-fbi/

Clinton met privately with a witness for FBI investigation.

I guess Putin must pay pretty well.

Whom must Putin pay? The author of the article?
I personally get no payment at all.
You should inform Putin that he is my debtor.

[Gustaf]

Guys, seriously, can we just stop giving attention to the Russian psy ops troll?

[egalitt]

Guys, seriously, can we just stop giving attention to the Russian psy ops troll?

Sure stop giving attention. Ignore obvious  facts. It would be very clever of you,  completely in Clinton's style.  

[ag]

Let us not feed this guy. He is here for money, and adds nothing to discussion.

[egalitt]

Let us not feed this guy. He is here for money, and adds nothing to discussion.

Ag, stupid, I repeat for the 100th time: I don't get any money, I have never been paid anything for my posts.
You can not comprehend this fact because it is you who are here for money. As well as lots of other Clinton backers.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Guys, seriously, can we just stop giving attention to the Russian psy ops troll?

Sure stop giving attention. Ignore obvious  facts. It would be very clever of you,  completely in Clinton's stile.  

Style.

You're welcome.

[egalitt]

Guys, seriously, can we just stop giving attention to the Russian psy ops troll?

Sure stop giving attention. Ignore obvious  facts. It would be very clever of you,  completely in Clinton's style.  

Style.

You're welcome.

Right. My participation in the forum aims at improving my command of English.

[ag]

Let us not feed this guy. He is here for money, and adds nothing to discussion.

Ag, stupid, I repeat for the 100th time: I don't get any money, I have never been paid anything for my posts.
You can not comprehend this fact because it is you who are here for money. As well as lots of other Clinton backers.

If you are in this not for money, it makes it simply sad. Why else would you waste tm insulting intelligence of others, talking about things you know exactly nothing about?

BTW, I do understand when I am being threatened, and do not appreciate it.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Guys, seriously, can we just stop giving attention to the Russian psy ops troll?

Sure stop giving attention. Ignore obvious  facts. It would be very clever of you,  completely in Clinton's style.  

Style.

You're welcome.

Right. My participation in the forum aims at improving my command of English.

Wow, so it seems you're just generally failing, because you're not achieving much.

You're really fitting the Russia stereotypes, plus matched with some of our more feral Hillary-haters... so yeah.

[egalitt]

Guys, seriously, can we just stop giving attention to the Russian psy ops troll?

Sure stop giving attention. Ignore obvious  facts. It would be very clever of you,  completely in Clinton's style.  

Style.

You're welcome.

Right. My participation in the forum aims at improving my command of English.

Wow, so it seems you're just generally failing, because you're not achieving much.

You're really fitting the Russia stereotypes, plus matched with some of our more feral Hillary-haters... so yeah.

If "Russia stereotypes"  presumes that some people can work without getting money, just for enthusiasm, the stereotypes are true. If "generally failing"  means that I don't get any money for my posts, then I am failing.

[IceSpear]

I really hope ol Vlad is paying you by the keystroke, because you sure as hell aren't changing many minds.

[pbrower2a]

I don't care a hug for observers. I know for sure that all people there support unification with Russia.

Count on this: it won't be long before "millions of people in Alaska" seek a reunion with Mother Russia".

Alaska does not even have millions of people.

[egalitt]

I really hope ol Vlad is paying you by the keystroke, because you sure as hell aren't changing many minds.

I wrote earlier here several times that Vlad is a diminutive of Vladislav while Putin's name is Vladimir, the diminutive of which is Vova,  or Vovan in youth slang.
For Putin to pay me you should inform him about me.  Can you do that? I'd be much obliged.
 

[egalitt]

I don't care a hug for observers. I know for sure that all people there support unification with Russia.

Count on this: it won't be long before "millions of people in Alaska" seek a reunion with Mother Russia".

Alaska does not even have millions of people.

Currently it seems fantastic, but well you never know. Anything can happen under your next President no matter who he/she is. Don't forget that Alaska was sold together with vast lands in California.  Russian America comprised Alaska and  a half of California.