Politics1.com has MI Sec. of State Terri Land as a potential candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2006 and it seems to be backed up by some comments that appeared in the Detroit Free Press -
http://www.freep.com/news/statewire/sw116049_20050519.htmMy question - Why would Land, who seems to be a credible candidate, want to risk her political career on a Senate run against an almost safe incumbent? Does the MI GOP sense some backlash against Granholm (which still amazes me. Just a few months ago, we were talking about how unbeatable she is...) that could have an impact on the Senate race?