Oh yes, because a fine of $50,000,00 per day is soooooooo realistic.
If you are going to craft a fantasyland completely one sided bill, at least make it semi believable.
And your part about denying parental permission for what happens to their own minor children is so progressive.
Why don't you simply deny parents any and all authority over their minor children and take minors out of their homes and away from their parents and indoctrinate them with your preferred way of anything goes LGBTQ philosophy?
Clearly, the authors of this bill are pimply faced 14 year olds with absolutely no clue about parental/child relationships. Why don't you just impose a fine of $100,000.00 per day for parents who want the right to care themselves for their minor children?
Now, your definition of marriage is a reeeeeeeeeeal gem.
"Marriage, for civil purposes, is the lawful union of two consenting persons to the exclusion of all others."
Which of you geniuses thought this up? You have just opened the door to some 50 year old pervert to marry a six year old child.
Yup, that's quite the forward looking bill you have there.
On the Marrige part it clearly states to consenting individuals, meaning your above scenario dosent happen, also we currently have laws governing at what age a person can give consent and it certainly is not 6 so your example is entirely unrealistic.
