House Legislation Introduction Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:56:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  House Legislation Introduction Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: House Legislation Introduction Thread  (Read 107114 times)
FairBol
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,807
United States


WWW
« on: July 19, 2020, 11:33:42 AM »

Not sure if I proposed this in the wrong thread, or not.  Feel free to remove/relocate if it doesn't go here.  Anywho....

Quote
Submitting this on behalf of the people of the Republic of Atlasia, and as a Concurrent Resolution.
 
Quote
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should enter into negotiations regarding portions of Oklahoma.

Be it resolved by the Senate and the House of Representatives, in Congress assembled:

SECTION 1. TITLE.

This Resolution may be cited as the "Eastern Oklahoma Negotiations Resolution"

SECTION 2. FINDINGS.

A. On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court (OOC, but regarded as binding for IG purposes) issued a decision in the matter of McGirt v. Oklahoma. At issue was whether Native American lands in the eastern region of the State of Oklahoma were ever disestablished by this body, and thus made part of the territory formerly known as the United States, and now known as the Republic of Atlasia.  More specifically, the matter at hand dealt with the validity of claims made by Native American tribes to lands in Eastern Oklahoma.
 
B. The Native American tribes that are parties to this matter (specifically, the Muscogee/Creek, Cherokee, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw tribes) may be known as (for the purposes of this resolution) the "Five Tribes of Oklahoma", hereafter referred to as the "Five Tribes".

C.  In a five-to-four majority decision, the Court held that, for the purposes of federal legislation, the lands claimed by the Five Tribes were never disestablished.  Writing for the majority, Honorable Justice Neil Gorsuch said "because Congress has not said (that the lands in question are part of Atlasia), we hold the government to its word".  

D.  The Court's ruling effectively puts the eastern half of the State of Oklahoma into exclusively Native American hands, and out of the jurisdiction of this government.  

E.  According to Article IV, Section II, sub-section 1, clause 7 of the Constitution of Atlasia, the President of Atlasia has the power

"to make treaties, with the advice and consent of the Senate"

.

F.  The proper remedy for this matter is to, (in partnership with the Five Tribes), draw up a treaty which (when enacted) will return the lands in question to the jurisdiction of Atlasia.  

SECTION 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

A.  It is the sense of this Congress that:

1.  The President should, by presentation of a diplomat of his choosing, immediately enter talks with representatives of the Five Tribes.  

2.  The stated purpose of these talks should be the return of now Native American lands in the eastern portion of Oklahoma to Atlasian control, as exercised by and for the regions, states, and people.

3.  If such negotiations are successful, and duly ratified by representatives of the Five Tribes, the President shall present any proposed treaty to the Senate, for possible ratification.

SECTION 4. WHEN EFFECTIVE.

This resolution shall become effective when passed by Congress.  
Logged
FairBol
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,807
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2021, 04:07:11 PM »

Not quite sure where the public can introduce bills, so I'll do it here. 

Quote
A Bill
Ensuring fairness regarding payment of winnings at gaming facilities


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Republic of Atlasia in Congress assembled,


SECTION 1 - TITLE

This bill may be cited as the "Fair Play in Gaming Act of 2021"


SECTION II - DEFINITIONS 

1. The term "gaming machine" is hereby defined as any device which, as installed at a non-Native American operated casino, purports to pay out any jackpot or sum of money. 

2. The term "malfunction" is defined as a failure of a gaming machine's operating system which renders the game unplayable. 

3. The term "violation" is defined as the refusal of a non-Native American operated casino to pay out any sum that is legitimately won (subject to the terms of this bill). 


SECTION III - FINDINGS

1. Congress finds as follows:

  A. There have been numerous instances of casinos that have refused to award advertised jackpots to winners of such.

  B. In the majority of these cases, such refusals are based upon claims of gaming machines having "malfunctioned".  In this regard, casinos claim that devices mistakenly and erroneously show the winning of a prize. 

  C. Mechanical breakdowns of slot-based gaming machines are extremely rare in occurrence. 

  D. In the event of a legitimate win, casinos should pay amounts that they advertise as potentially being paid. 


SECTION IV - GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. In order to ensure the good working order of gaming machines, inspections of such shall take place every six months.  The gaming commissions of individual states shall be charged with the operation and oversight of these inspections. 

2. In cases of legitimate jackpot wins, casinos shall pay at least the amount advertised as the "maximum jackpot", excepting cases where a malfunction or player fraud is conclusively proven. 

3. Any casino subsequently required to pay a jackpot shall begin payments of funds no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after a claim of victory. 

4. Nothing in this bill shall be construed as requiring jackpot payouts from Native American-operated casinos. 


SECTION V - PENALTIES

1. A casino found to be in violation of Section IV sub-section 2 shall have its gaming license suspended for no less than ninety (90) days. 

2. Thereafter, for every thirty (30) days that a casino continues to be in violation of Section IV sub-section 2, no less than thirty (30) days shall be added to the suspension of such a casino's gaming license. 

3. If a casino continues to be in violation of Section IV sub-section 2 for a period exceeding one (1) year, the associated state gaming commission may choose to permanently suspend the casino's gaming license. 


SECTION VI - IMPLEMENTATION

1. This legislation shall take effect immediately after passage. 


Can I get a bill sponsor?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.