Marquette Law School: Feingold +9 (LV) / +5 (RV)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 01:58:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  Marquette Law School: Feingold +9 (LV) / +5 (RV)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Marquette Law School: Feingold +9 (LV) / +5 (RV)  (Read 1400 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,478
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 15, 2016, 01:02:03 PM »

LV:
Feingold 51
Johnson 42

RV:
Feingold 47
Johnson 42

Link to tweet
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2016, 01:05:21 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,478
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2016, 01:09:20 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2016, 01:17:30 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
That seems to be the case here, this time. Feingold supporters probably didn't turn out for him in 2010, but are excited to get him back it seems. Outside groups need to write this race off. This seat (and Illinois and New Hampshire as well) is gone.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,580
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2016, 01:43:54 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
That seems to be the case here, this time. Feingold supporters probably didn't turn out for him in 2010, but are excited to get him back it seems. Outside groups need to write this race off. This seat (and Illinois and New Hampshire as well) is gone.

This is a ridiculous notion. At the end of the day, I don't see any reason why there would be a notable number of Trump/Feingold voters. Trump is going to try to win Wisconsin, and if he wins it, Johnson probably holds on. New Hampshire consistently polls within 1 or 2 percentage points - even if you can't get all the way to a victory, at least make dems think you can and keep them spending precious resources there. And nobody really knows what's going on in Illinois since it almost never gets polled.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2016, 01:52:19 PM »

Feingold's lead is identical to Clinton's, which is unsurprising. Sure, it's hard to imagine a Trump/Feingold voter, but it seems very improbable that there will be many Clinton/Johnson voters. Johnson's been consistently behind Feingold, and it's usually well outside the margin of error. I think I'm ready to call this race Likely D, since I think Wisconsin is Likely D at the presidential level.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2016, 02:19:17 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
That seems to be the case here, this time. Feingold supporters probably didn't turn out for him in 2010, but are excited to get him back it seems. Outside groups need to write this race off. This seat (and Illinois and New Hampshire as well) is gone.

This is a ridiculous notion. At the end of the day, I don't see any reason why there would be a notable number of Trump/Feingold voters. Trump is going to try to win Wisconsin, and if he wins it, Johnson probably holds on. New Hampshire consistently polls within 1 or 2 percentage points - even if you can't get all the way to a victory, at least make dems think you can and keep them spending precious resources there. And nobody really knows what's going on in Illinois since it almost never gets polled.

Sure is a shame then that most polls, including this one, show Trump more than 10 points behind Clinton in Wisconsin.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,580
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2016, 02:25:16 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
That seems to be the case here, this time. Feingold supporters probably didn't turn out for him in 2010, but are excited to get him back it seems. Outside groups need to write this race off. This seat (and Illinois and New Hampshire as well) is gone.

This is a ridiculous notion. At the end of the day, I don't see any reason why there would be a notable number of Trump/Feingold voters. Trump is going to try to win Wisconsin, and if he wins it, Johnson probably holds on. New Hampshire consistently polls within 1 or 2 percentage points - even if you can't get all the way to a victory, at least make dems think you can and keep them spending precious resources there. And nobody really knows what's going on in Illinois since it almost never gets polled.

Sure is a shame then that most polls, including this one, show Trump more than 10 points behind Clinton in Wisconsin.

Right, and Dukakis was supposed to win in a landslide nationwide at this point in 1988. Polls at this point are mostly just noise; few voters are actually paying attention. Yeah, I have WI at Lean D based on the polling and fundamentals, but I won't go any further than that until we get much closer to the election.

I will say it's kind of funny that in 2014, Dems refused to give up on a single incumbent, ever, not even Pryor, while this year the republicans see it as okay to cut some people loose and hope you hold basically everything else.
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,628
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2016, 04:52:26 PM »

New Poll: Wisconsin Senator by Marquette Law School on 2016-06-12

Summary: D: 51%, R: 42%, U: 7%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2016, 08:50:36 AM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
That seems to be the case here, this time. Feingold supporters probably didn't turn out for him in 2010, but are excited to get him back it seems. Outside groups need to write this race off. This seat (and Illinois and New Hampshire as well) is gone.
I wouldn't write off Illinois just yet.  And New Hampshire is most certainly NOT gone.  Ayotte is tied with Hassan right now, while Duckworth and Feingold seem to have pretty decent leads.  I'd expect Wisconsin and Illinois to go D this year long before New Hampshire.
Logged
JMT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,106


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2016, 12:50:21 PM »

How is his lead bigger with likely voters than registered voters?  If anything, I would expect the opposite.

Democrats are more excited to vote. 99% you can blame that on Trump.
That seems to be the case here, this time. Feingold supporters probably didn't turn out for him in 2010, but are excited to get him back it seems. Outside groups need to write this race off. This seat (and Illinois and New Hampshire as well) is gone.
I wouldn't write off Illinois just yet.  And New Hampshire is most certainly NOT gone.  Ayotte is tied with Hassan right now, while Duckworth and Feingold seem to have pretty decent leads.  I'd expect Wisconsin and Illinois to go D this year long before New Hampshire.

I agree, I wouldn't write off Illinois (or Wisconsin) just yet, but I still think they are lean D and we'll likely see a Senator Duckworth and Feingold in November. NH, on the other hand, is a pure tossup, anyone's guess who will win that. Hassan and Ayotte are tied pretty much, and they are both popular. If I had to predict, I say Hassan wins narrowly because I expect Clinton to win the state and NH is slightly more democratic in presidential years, but it really could go either way.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.