ABC-Washngton Post: TRUMP's favorables tank hard

[Landslide Lyndon]

LMAO!

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trumps-unfavorables-spike-clintons-challenged-poll/story?id=39856303

[Wells]

lol

[Fusionmunster]

Is it bad that im happy when Clinton's favoribility ratings are in the 40s?

[Boston Bread]

Clinton improved with RVs. All adults mean nothing for elections.
She has 40% unfav with liberals. lol Bernie Bros

[HillOfANight]

Looking at it year over year is better for Trump worse for Clinton.

[john cage bubblegum]

89% unfavorability with Latinos.

Eighty.  Nine.  Per.  Cent.

Enjoy getting destroyed in November you narcissistic d-bag!

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Looking at it year over year is better for Trump worse for Clinton.

Not really much comparison...

[Angrie]

Good to see that the American people at large are rejecting the racist rapist. However, Trump has higher favorability than Clinton among white voters.

[psychprofessor]

The one area that Clinton has room to grow is with white women - I would love for her to choose someone like Warren as VP to see if she can eat into those numbers for white women and liberals.

[Angrie]

The one area that Clinton has room to grow is with white women - I would love for her to choose someone like Warren as VP to see if she can eat into those numbers for white women and liberals.

That would definitely help her. I think a lot of liberal women (particularly younger) are sort of meh about Hillary. On the one hand, she could be the first woman president, which is fantastic. On the other hand, there is not much to actually like about her, and she will be a downgrade from Obama on a substantive basis. There is really a huge age divide, with older women much more enthusiastic about Hillary.

If she could do something to turn that meh into actual enthusiasm, she would indeed have room to grow. Picking Warren, or another qualified solidly progressive woman as her running mate, would go a long way.

[Holmes]

89% unfavorability with Latinos.

Eighty.  Nine.  Per.  Cent.

Enjoy getting destroyed in November you narcissistic d-bag!

And 94% among blacks. Wow.

Clinton's unfavorables are - surprise! - driven by whites and men. She's above water with women and all non-white groups. Trump is actually 10% more favorable among whites than Clinton is, but if Trump is utterly blown out among all non-white groups and only wins whites by about 10% (not that favorability = votes, but still), it's gonna be a rough looking electoral map for Republicans.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

Utterly brutal numbers for Cackles McWallStreet.  America deserves better than these two.  Oh, despair.

[Holmes]

Utterly brutal numbers for Cackles McWallStreet.  America deserves better than these two.  Oh, despair.

Or, maybe it's a good thing that the only racial group she's underwater with is whites. Let them whine.

[IceSpear]

Good to see that the American people at large are rejecting the racist rapist. However, Trump has higher favorability than Clinton among white voters.

Of course. If Hillary even came close with whites it would be the biggest landslide since 1984.

[Green Line]

DUMP HIM!!!! We're careening off the electoral cliff. It's not too late

[Redban]

Historically, have these un-favorable ratings correlated with actual votes? "Unfavorability" seems general and vague.

Reasonably, voters might dislike a candidate personally yet still feel comfortable voting for him or her, as likability does not directly relate to person's ability to perform the job.

[dspNY]

Historically, have these un-favorable ratings correlated with actual votes? "Unfavorability" seems general and vague.

Reasonably, voters might dislike a candidate personally yet still feel comfortable voting for him or her, as likability does not directly relate to person's ability to perform the job.

Yes they correlate pretty closely with actual votes, usually within 5% of the candidate's overall vote share unless a President is hugely popular (like FDR or Ike) or we have a black swan event

[dspNY]

Trump's 89% disapproval among Hispanics means that Texas is definitely in single digits and possibly in play this fall for the Dems

[Ebsy]

I wonder what the horse race numbers are.

[Redban]

Trump's 89% disapproval among Hispanics means that Texas is definitely in single digits and possibly in play this fall for the Dems

Disagree ... the information here doesn't support that claim.

Firstly, turnout is the major issue with Hispanics in Texas; and this 89% disapproval rating doesn't signify that turnout will increase.

Secondly, Hispanics in Texas have historically voted more Republican than Hispanics nationwide do. Thus, it's possible that Hispanics in New York and California are driving this 89% disapproval. As this poll does not offer state-by-state polls on Hispanics, it becomes unreasonable to target Texas based on this poll.

Your talk about Texas's becoming a swing state in 2016 is more of a wish than a prediction. It will take at least another generation.

[The Other Castro]

I wonder what the horse race numbers are.

Probably around Clinton +8.

[Gass3268]

I wonder what the horse race numbers are.

Probably around Clinton +8.

Was Trump +2 in their last poll.

[The Other Castro]

I wonder what the horse race numbers are.

Probably around Clinton +8.

Was Trump +2 in their last poll.

They had a pretty big swing in favorables, so I expect a big head-to-head swing as well.

[Ljube]

Good to see that the American people at large are rejecting the racist rapist. However, Trump has higher favorability than Clinton among white voters.

Of course. If Hillary even came close with whites it would be the biggest landslide since 1984.

There is no way she can come close with whites, because her policies are anti-white.

They are anti-all in fact. It's just that the whites get it and the others don't get it, yet.

[Dr. Arch]

Good to see that the American people at large are rejecting the racist rapist. However, Trump has higher favorability than Clinton among white voters.

Of course. If Hillary even came close with whites it would be the biggest landslide since 1984.

There is no way she can come close with whites, because her policies are anti-white.

They are anti-all in fact. It's just that the whites get it and the others don't get it, yet.

Aww, the poor minorities are too ignorant to "get it." Yea, okay. Keep it up.