CLINTON EVISCERATES TRUMP

[Holmes]

The crowd laughing at Trump quotes was a great part actually. Especially when they were things Trump has literally said.

[Taco Truck 🚚]

Anyone who is not in a maximum security penitentiary can credibly talk about Trump's lack of judgement.  

It are exactly these kind of arrogant and offensive remarks that make people so angry. Im new to this forum, but I cant believe how polarized it is.

The guy called Mexicans rapists...  I have joined ever living former Republican president in stating that the guy has exceedingly poor judgement.  How exactly is that "polarized"?

[Orthogonian Society Treasurer]

Anyone who is not in a maximum security penitentiary can credibly talk about Trump's lack of judgement.  

It are exactly these kind of arrogant and offensive remarks that make people so angry. Im new to this forum, but I cant believe how polarized it is.

The guy called Mexicans rapists...  I have joined ever living former Republican president both George Bushes in stating that the guy has exceedingly poor judgement.  How exactly is that "polarized"?

[Phony Moderate]

When will the video of Clinton eviscerating Trump be posted?

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

is there a transcript?

[SillyAmerican]

I watched parts of the speech. Very scripted and unnatural, even the laughs are scripted. I found it to be very boring, cheap shots, not thrustworthy. I honestly do not think that people will buy these arguments. She is not the person to talk about good judgement. Something with a pot and a kettle.

And for the speech: she is definitely not Obama.

But maybe I have a different view of this as a European.

Yeah, and I tend to agree with Marc Thiesson, who on the June 2nd Kelly File, said:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Santander]

There are people in the comments section on RedState saying it was a great speech.

The comments section on RedState.

That doesn't surprise me. RedState actually has a pretty civilized and coherent comment section as far as comment sections go. It's certainly no Breitbart or TheBlaze.

[BlueSwan]

She made a caricature of Trump

This is just not true. She was very careful to quote Trump directly. Every Trump quote she gave in that speech was accurate.

[bumpercrop]

I watched parts of the speech. Very scripted and unnatural, even the laughs are scripted. I found it to be very boring, cheap shots, not thrustworthy. I honestly do not think that people will buy these arguments. She is not the person to talk about good judgement. Something with a pot and a kettle.

And for the speech: she is definitely not Obama.

But maybe I have a different view of this as a European.

Yeah, and I tend to agree with Marc Thiesson, who on the June 2nd Kelly File, said:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

WTF does Megyn "Bleeding from Wherever" Kelly know about the world being more safe or not? In the same vein wtf do you know about this. Clue: you don't and are talking out of your ass.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

It's cute when apparently bright people act stupid. The role of the SoS is not to design foreign policy alone, but work WITH the President, and the National Security team to develop it and most importantly, enact it.

This isn't hard people.

The speech was effective as it communicated clearly to a GE audience that Trump is a clueless, petty and incredibly "small" person who doesn't understand foreign policy ... in any form. It's not about winning over Trump voters, it's about making sure he doesn't win any more.

[Sir Mohamed]

Well done, Hillary. Go on and expose that the Trumpster is total fraud.

[Meclazine for Israel]

Yeah, this was great at making Trump look like he's crazy. Blunt statements showing his character and how inconsistent he is makes him look more of a joke than he already is. All of her surrogates need to use similar phrasing, if not be more aggressive. Republicans were weak at attacking Trump, I think we're only seeing the beginning of how hard the democrats will go after him. I'm excited for the debates, of course unless Trump drops out to use the vets as a shield again.

Having said that, I think Hillary needs to work on a more concise vision as to what she has to offer, rather than just being against Trump. Also, does it bug anyone else how she nods her head all the time? It comes across as arrogant, even if it's not.

The second paragraph is spot on.

There is little coverage on her actual policiea, but if she says something about Trump, it get's airtime.

The democrats have been waiting for Hillary for some time to fire up.

Game on.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Yep, she knows what she's doing. Hawkish, but that's who she is and I'll take it over someone who has no plan at all.

The majority of this speech in a nutshell: "Hey! At least I'm not that crazy guy, Trump!"
Seriously though, still can't stand her and her center-right talking points. Worst nominees in a generation.

This nation is not going to elect a socialist.

Honestly, as much credibility as there is to the possibility of the republican party slowly going extinct due to not appealing to minorities enough and its most devoted parts being disproportionately older (A majority of young republicans are the type that supported Rubio or Kasich or Jebra (Several had Rand as their first choice, yes, but he dropped out after Iowa) in the primaries, meaning they tend to be more moderate (especially on social issues) and might leave the party under certain circumstances.), there is credibility to a theory that the Democratic Party is dying off as well. Given how well Sanders did despite the cards being brutally stacked against him, the party base is dramatically socializing itself. The problem with this is that it's clear that this Socialization cannot appeal to black voters. Say goodbye (eventually) to Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida - but not necessarily to the republicans. Our next system of parties could be something like this:

"Bernie Sanders Party" - The modern-day democratic party, but now completely socialist and generally unable to reach 270 electoral votes due to lack of appeal to black voters.
"Reformed Libertarian Party" - Moderate Democrats and Moderate Republicans, frustrated with their now failing old parties, beef up the libertarian party and substantially moderate its platform.
"Ted Cruz Party" - Teabaggers extraordinare, generally unable to reach 270 electoral votes but remains a powerful presence in much of the south and Plains and parts of the midwest, occasionally earning a plurality in the HoR.

This is why I've been saying since f***ing August that the Democratic party needs to aggressively counter the policy and strategy of Bernie Sanders.  His policies are foolish, misguided, and wrong, and his strategy is selfish and intentionally divisive, destructive, and alienating to large swaths of voters.  If 40% of the Democratic party honestly believes that the simple-minded rhetoric and viewpoints that Sanders espouses and the free candy and revenge narrative he promises would be good policy, then it is the responsibility of the Democratic party to work its butt off to repeatedly drill into the brains of its base just how stupid they are, like eradicating a bacteria from your body, NOT to say "well 40% of our base believes this garbage so we must find some way to make it 40% of our party's core policy and strategic foundation."

Abloobloobloo.

The Democratic Party isn't going to eradicate 40% of its voters because the Democratic Party isn't run by little bitches from Idaho who insist on pissing and moaning at the other side even when their preferred candidate is winning.

You really are the worst shtposter here, aren't you?  At least StatesPoll attempts to offer (deeply flawed) analysis with the impression of numbers and facts.  You have yet to write a single coherent thought here or anything other than your annoying emotional outbursts.  Ignored.

[Tartarus Sauce]

Apparently the account was terminated so I can't watch the video. I won't lose any sleep over it though, not sure what everybody is getting so excited about. Exposing Trump as a shallow, petty fraud? Like he was ever any good at concealing his negative attributes.

[HagridOfTheDeep]

Lol at people here pretending Hillary Clinton has no credibility on foreign policy and Trump does.

People: Trump is not a qualified candidate for president. This is not a normal candidacy. There is no need to legitimize it or pretend he is of any sort of acceptable calibre.

[Holmes]

The sad reality is, if it's not about Trump, the media doesn't really care. On the same day Trump spoke at the NRA (which the media covered), Clinton spoke at the Trayvon Foundation, not covered. On the same day Clinton spoke at the SEIU conference, the media instead showed an empty Trump podium, awaiting his arrival. So if the only way to get on TV is to talk about how much of a loser he is (by using his own words), then go for it.

[IceSpear]

Lol at people here pretending Hillary Clinton has no credibility on foreign policy and Trump does.

People: Trump is not a qualified candidate for president. This is not a normal candidacy. There is no need to legitimize it or pretend he is of any sort of acceptable calibre.

There is a need: ratings and Hillary hatred.

[skoods]

https://youtu.be/-6m_0fOkQ3E

Pbs version so it shouldn't get deleted

[tallguy23]

She killed it.

[SillyAmerican]

People: Trump is not a qualified candidate for president. This is not a normal candidacy. There is no need to legitimize it or pretend he is of any sort of acceptable calibre.

Actually, I think it's up to the electorate to decide who is qualified and/or acceptable. I'm still waiting to hear what Hillary Clinton did as SoS that makes her so much more qualified. The Obama foreign policy seems to be a bit of a problem, and Hillary Clinton was instrumental in helping to shape that policy.

While I believe Clinton's attack of Trump on the question of his temperament is legitimate, I have yet to hear anything about why she is more qualified to deal with foreign policy issues. I mean, which of her ideas, specifically, make her better at addressing foreign policy concerns? Which of her past successes point to her being a better candidate? Would that be Libya? Syria? Russia? China? North Korea? No, really, where are we talking about?

[Lyin' Steve]

People: Trump is not a qualified candidate for president. This is not a normal candidacy. There is no need to legitimize it or pretend he is of any sort of acceptable calibre.

Actually, I think it's up to the electorate to decide who is qualified and/or acceptable. I'm still waiting to hear what Hillary Clinton did as SoS that makes her so much more qualified. The Obama foreign policy seems to be a bit of a problem, and Hillary Clinton was instrumental in helping to shape that policy.

While I believe Clinton's attack of Trump on the question of his temperament is legitimate, I have yet to hear anything about why she is more qualified to deal with foreign policy issues. I mean, which of her ideas, specifically, make her better at addressing foreign policy concerns? Which of her past successes point to her being a better candidate? Would that be Libya? Syria? Russia? China? North Korea? No, really, where are we talking about?

She gave a list of some of her accomplishments during her speech.  Didn't include some of what I thought were her greatest triumphs, like Myanmar, but to each his own.

[IceSpear]

This was a very strong rebuke of Trump's "campaign", while placing herself on the high ground of experience and temperance; well done!

A strong rebuke? She basically says she disagrees with Donald Trump. I imagine Donald Trump will say that he disagrees with Hillary Clinton; will we see a TRUMP EVISCERATES CLINTON thread? Why do I doubt it? Good luck trying to convince the silent majority that Clinton deserves their vote, 'cuz I don't think they're going to buy it.

Uh, this forum circlejerks about how HILLARY GOT DEMOLISHED!1!! any time Trump releases some terrible Instagram "ad."

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

The majority of this speech in a nutshell: "Hey! At least I'm not that crazy guy, Trump!"
Seriously though, still can't stand her and her center-right talking points. Worst nominees in a generation.

And that's why the speech was a success. It takes for granted that TrumpMiller is, "that crazy guy". Everyone listening to it who isn't already a party of the Trump-cult is going to come away with not the idea, but the unquestioned certainty that "Trump is a crazy guy". (And not funny-crazy, but scary-crazy.)

Two months of successfully defining Trump as "that crazy guy" and this election will be over.

[Hermit For Peace]

The majority of this speech in a nutshell: "Hey! At least I'm not that crazy guy, Trump!"
Seriously though, still can't stand her and her center-right talking points. Worst nominees in a generation.

And that's why the speech was a success. It takes for granted that TrumpMiller is, "that crazy guy". Everyone listening to it who isn't already a party of the Trump-cult is going to come away with not the idea, but the unquestioned certainty that "Trump is a crazy guy". (And not funny-crazy, but scary-crazy.)

Two months of successfully defining Trump as "that crazy guy" and this election will be over.

The thing is, at this point people are becoming tone deaf. They probably are no longer listening to anything bad said about Trump. They just hear and see what they want to hear and see. I and I'm sure many others don't listen to anything said negatively about Hillary any longer because we've already heard it all to last a lifetime. Our minds are already made up who to vote for.

[Orthogonian Society Treasurer]

This scripted speech delivered by a career politician surrounded by teleprompter screens will no doubt be the silver bullet that kills Trump's campaign!