Reuters/Ipsos: Clinton +11
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 03:30:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Reuters/Ipsos: Clinton +11
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reuters/Ipsos: Clinton +11  (Read 747 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 31, 2016, 03:19:02 PM »

Clinton: 46
Trump 35

May 27-31, Likely Voters

RIP Clinton's failed candidacy.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2016, 03:20:55 PM »

Shame this isn't factored into the RCP average - I have a few bucks riding on Clinton beating Trump by 2 percent or more by June 2nd.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,029
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2016, 03:21:37 PM »

What a beautiful result from a beautiful pollster who has repeatably divulged accurate and consistent results, time and time again.

Oh, wait.

This is the same pollster who had Jeb nearly leading the pack of the GOP primary as he crashed and burned painfully, and that's coming from me. This forum has been disregarding Reuters for the past year, next.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,592
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2016, 03:22:10 PM »

Obviously junk.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2016, 03:28:50 PM »
« Edited: May 31, 2016, 03:46:05 PM by StatesPoll »

Clinton: 46
Trump 35

May 27-31, Likely Voters

RIP Clinton's failed candidacy.

Ipsos/Reuters 5/28-5/31. TRUMP vs Hillary (National)
http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM651Y15_13


TRUMP: 32%(5/28), 30.9%(5/29), 30.2%(5/30), 30.5%(5/31) Avg: 31%
Hillary: 40%(5/28), 40.8%(5/29), 41.6%(5/30), 41.1%(5/31) Avg: 41%
TRUMP 31% | Hillary 41%

It looks like Hillary beat TRUMP like a landslide.


But This time. Sampling of the Ipsos/Reuters was very unrealistic.

DEM(48%) > 42%=REP(32%) + Ind(10%). It’s a joke…..

Election 2012 it was Rep+Ind= 61% > DEM 38%.

I really don’t get it why they are doing these sampling(unrealistic ratio)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Voter_demographics


Ipsos/Reuters 5/28-5/31. TRUMP vs Hillary (National)

1) DEM: 48%
http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM651Y15_13/filters/PARTY_ID_:1/dates/20160528-20160531/type/day

2) REP 32%
http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM651Y15_13/filters/PARTY_ID_:2/dates/20160528-20160531/type/day

3) Ind 10%
http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM651Y15_13/filters/PARTY_ID_:3/dates/20160528-20160531/type/day
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2016, 03:34:02 PM »

Reuters is trash.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2016, 03:37:25 PM »

Yes, it tends to jump around without much reason to, though not nearly as much as the Democratic primary one did.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2016, 03:40:29 PM »

I certainly hope none of our esteemed posters that took "Clout Research" or a literal fradulent polling firm (Overtime) seriously are going to be picky about Reuters.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2016, 03:41:15 PM »

I certainly hope none of our esteemed posters that took "Clout Research" or a literal fradulent polling firm (Overtime) seriously are going to be picky about Reuters.
"Clout Research" is literally Wenzel Strategies in sheeps clothing.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,999
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2016, 03:46:49 PM »

I certainly hope none of our esteemed posters that took "Clout Research" or a literal fradulent polling firm (Overtime) seriously are going to be picky about Reuters.

Who took them seriously?
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2016, 03:47:49 PM »

What a beautiful result from a beautiful pollster who has repeatably divulged accurate and consistent results, time and time again.

Oh, wait.

This is the same pollster who had Jeb nearly leading the pack of the GOP primary as he crashed and burned painfully, and that's coming from me. This forum has been disregarding Reuters for the past year, next.

Yes, agreed.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2016, 03:51:20 PM »
« Edited: May 31, 2016, 03:56:26 PM by StatesPoll »

I certainly hope none of our esteemed posters that took "Clout Research" or a literal fradulent polling firm (Overtime) seriously are going to be picky about Reuters.

picky?
So, DEM 48% > Rep 32% + Ind 10% for National Poll.
Those sampling is fine with you?


As a national Poll. DEM 48% > REP+Ind=42%. it doesn't make sense at all.
 

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2016, 04:00:02 PM »

I certainly hope none of our esteemed posters that took "Clout Research" or a literal fradulent polling firm (Overtime) seriously are going to be picky about Reuters.

Who took them seriously?

Well for one, he who shall not be named that is currently in this thread.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,127
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2016, 04:46:10 PM »

Pretty close to what I have. I have an R-8 election across the board, which would be C+10.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2016, 08:20:11 PM »

I certainly hope none of our esteemed posters that took "Clout Research" or a literal fradulent polling firm (Overtime) seriously are going to be picky about Reuters.

picky?
So, DEM 48% > Rep 32% + Ind 10% for National Poll.
Those sampling is fine with you?


As a national Poll. DEM 48% > REP+Ind=42%. it doesn't make sense at all.
 



And LIKELY Voters to boot. I guess there's absolutely no energy on the Republican side this year. /sarcasm
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 13 queries.