WI- Public Opinion Strategies: Clinton +12
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 06:04:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  WI- Public Opinion Strategies: Clinton +12
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: WI- Public Opinion Strategies: Clinton +12  (Read 4378 times)
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,986
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 25, 2016, 03:51:31 PM »

Wisconsin is just no good place for TRUMP. He should heavily focus on Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan and Ohio.

I'd say just Pennsylvania, Michigan and Ohio. And Florida too.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 25, 2016, 09:13:04 PM »

B-b-b-but everyone told me Wisconsin is a toss-up because THREE TIMES IN FOUR YEARS and MUH PRIMARY TURNOUT!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 25, 2016, 10:05:54 PM »

Should be noted that some right wing talk radio in Wisconsin is still #NeverTrump and have stated they will not back down. That's not going to help Trump in the Fall.

If they stick to their guns, that's great news. They were proven to have quite a bit of influence in the primary.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,618
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 25, 2016, 10:11:51 PM »

Shame they didn't test Johnson. Wisconsin has a history of high Libertarian result when faced with two unacceptable candidates. In the 2002 gubernatorial election, a dissident Republican ran on the Libertarian line and received 11% of the vote against two disliked major-party candidates (causing the actual Republican to lose the race, 45-41). If Johnson is truly at 10% nationally like the Morning Consult/Monmouth polls show, then he is at least in the mid-teens here (and if he's at 4% nationally like PPP shows, that would still be high single-digits here).
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 26, 2016, 01:30:41 PM »

Shame they didn't test Johnson. Wisconsin has a history of high Libertarian result when faced with two unacceptable candidates. In the 2002 gubernatorial election, a dissident Republican ran on the Libertarian line and received 11% of the vote against two disliked major-party candidates (causing the actual Republican to lose the race, 45-41).

Oh yeah!  I totally voted for that guy.  I can't remember his name, though.



#NeverTrump can run a Johnson & Johnson campaign - Gary and Ron.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 27, 2016, 12:32:57 AM »

B-b-but Trump could turn the rust belt blue!!!!!
Because Trump did so well in RINO-loving Wisconsin in the primaries.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 27, 2016, 02:43:14 AM »


in my opinion, TRUMP's chance of winning.

MN > CT = OR >= WA = WI



Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 27, 2016, 01:52:55 PM »


Wait... what?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 27, 2016, 02:22:32 PM »


In other words, he has no chance of winning any of those states.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 27, 2016, 03:14:11 PM »


Behold! Statespoll has invented a new kind of math!
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,127
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: May 27, 2016, 05:03:30 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

:lol:

Feel the Bern!
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,127
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: May 27, 2016, 05:05:10 PM »

Ohh, an R-7.5 map! Cheesy
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 28, 2016, 08:52:53 PM »
« Edited: May 28, 2016, 09:11:23 PM by StatesPoll »


New Poll: TRUMP beat Hillary 44-42 in Oregon.
( Oregon Statewide Survey of Likely General Election Voters May 10-13,2016, 657 RV)

http://cloutpolitical.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2016/05/OR-Statewide-Poll-Memorandum-5-18-2016.pdf

How r u feel? u snobby. My Analysis was right. I said Oregon could be a swing state in 2016. since long time ago.

when I posted it (Oregon could be a swing state in 2016) 2weeks ago


Everybody laughed on me.....

But I was right.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 29, 2016, 07:24:03 AM »

New Poll: TRUMP beat Hillary 44-42 in Oregon.
( Oregon Statewide Survey of Likely General Election Voters May 10-13,2016, 657 RV)

http://cloutpolitical.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2016/05/OR-Statewide-Poll-Memorandum-5-18-2016.pdf

How r u feel? u snobby. My Analysis was right. I said Oregon could be a swing state in 2016. since long time ago.

when I posted it (Oregon could be a swing state in 2016) 2weeks ago


Everybody laughed on me.....

But I was right.

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=c5ebe6be-4a04-4ebd-87c0-4f09c2359c43
He won by 16

Even in 2012 polls underestimated Obama by 6.

One poll in May tells you nothing about November. Yes, Oregon has been a battleground state in the past. No, it won't go for Trump this year. You can count on it, Mr. ">="
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 29, 2016, 12:02:51 PM »

Wisconsin up 12 D -- Wisconsin must be very close to a Republican win if not a state voting R if the Republican nominee is to win the Presidency.

Wisconsin, 56-44 D? 2008 redux. That means that Florida and Ohio are both going for the Democrat.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 29, 2016, 12:37:55 PM »

Wisconsin up 12 D -- Wisconsin must be very close to a Republican win if not a state voting R if the Republican nominee is to win the Presidency.

Wisconsin, 56-44 D? 2008 redux. That means that Florida and Ohio are both going for the Democrat.

Ohio and Wisconsin are two completely different environments this year. Their Republican Parties have different bases, socioeconomic demographics, expectations for governance, etc. Anecdotally, almost every Republican I know in Ohio is voting for Trump while most of the Republicans I know in Wisconsin won't.

Anyway, I suspect the undecideds really are that high in Wisconsin right now, though they aren't so much undecided and determined not to vote for either candidate.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 29, 2016, 12:39:33 PM »

B-b-but Trump could turn the rust belt blue!!!!!
Because Trump did so well in RINO-loving Wisconsin in the primaries.

Because Scott Walker and Ted Cruz are RINOs and conservatism means who can lie the angriest. Roll Eyes
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,037
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 30, 2016, 09:36:42 AM »

What the heck? I'm so confused. Atlas told me that the cheeseheads up there hated that biatch Hitlery Clinton.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: May 30, 2016, 09:45:23 AM »

What the heck? I'm so confused. Atlas told me that the cheeseheads up there hated that b**** Hitlery Clinton.

We do. We just hate Trump more. If either party had nominated someone else they'd be up a ton.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: May 30, 2016, 10:03:53 AM »

Scott Walker is very much an Establishment Republican. 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 14 queries.