NM-PPP: Clinton +8%, Johnson in double digits
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 09:45:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NM-PPP: Clinton +8%, Johnson in double digits
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: NM-PPP: Clinton +8%, Johnson in double digits  (Read 3556 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 17, 2016, 07:38:20 PM »

We all know that double-digit position for Johnson won't last.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,026
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 18, 2016, 06:28:01 PM »

New Mexico is not a swing state this year; Arizona is. In a good year for a Republican nominee, New Mexico is a swing state and Arizona isn't.

Ohio is not a swing state this year; Michigan is. In a good year for a Democratic nominee, Ohio is a swing state and Michigan isn't.
Logged
Rick Grimes
Rookie
**
Posts: 94


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 20, 2016, 12:25:57 AM »

hmmm maybe johnson gets large funding from the mormon mafia which could help him win some mountain states and throw this thing 2 the house?
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 20, 2016, 12:38:41 AM »

New Mexico is not a swing state this year; Arizona is. In a good year for a Republican nominee, New Mexico is a swing state and Arizona isn't.

Ohio is not a swing state this year; Michigan is. In a good year for a Democratic nominee, Ohio is a swing state and Michigan isn't.

Except Michigan isn't a swing state. Where is your evidence to back up this ridiculous narrative other than conjecture?

MI: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_trump_vs_clinton-5533.html

DAT SWING

OH: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/oh/ohio_trump_vs_clinton-5634.html

DAT SAFE
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,316
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 20, 2016, 01:49:36 AM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
It's an open election. History shows that Trump will likely outperform Romney. Romney was a terrible candidate.

As to the point of NM, thought, it's probably a lean D this cycle. Trump would win by a healthy margin if he took the state.

Wut?

$100 on it. Here and now. Totally serious.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,026
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 20, 2016, 01:56:10 PM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
It's an open election. History shows that Trump will likely outperform Romney. Romney was a terrible candidate.

As to the point of NM, thought, it's probably a lean D this cycle. Trump would win by a healthy margin if he took the state.

Wut?

$100 on it. Here and now. Totally serious.

Badger, you old Pub hating hack!
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 20, 2016, 03:59:13 PM »

Anyone who thinks New Mexico will be that close is delusional.
I was going to agree, but then I saw your post in the thread IceSpear linked. "5+7=12, so twelve point Clinton lead."

Well, 8+666=674, so Clinton wins by 674 percent.
Logged
President Freedom
Newbie
*
Posts: 7
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.11, S: -7.42

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 21, 2016, 06:47:23 PM »

I don't believe it for a second, but if Gary can do this well in New Mexico, I'm all for it.
Logged
Bakersfield Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,736
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 21, 2016, 11:26:46 PM »

I don't believe it for a second, but if Gary can do this well in New Mexico, I'm all for it.

Same here. I'd bet that he'll break 5% in NM and maybe a few other states, but I doubt he'll break double digits anywhere.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 22, 2016, 02:28:37 AM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
It's an open election. History shows that Trump will likely outperform Romney. Romney was a terrible candidate.

As to the point of NM, thought, it's probably a lean D this cycle. Trump would win by a healthy margin if he took the state.

And Trump is a good one?

LOL
Trump surpassed George W. Bush as the leading vote getter all-time in Republican primaries. So as far as the base goes, I'd say the answer is yes. You can see from the national polling that the party has pretty much unified like they typically do after a primary.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.