NM-PPP: Clinton +8%, Johnson in double digits
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 05:08:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NM-PPP: Clinton +8%, Johnson in double digits
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: NM-PPP: Clinton +8%, Johnson in double digits  (Read 3549 times)
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,045


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 17, 2016, 08:58:05 AM »

http://nmpoliticalreport.com/44100/clinton-leads-in-nm-in-three-way-race/

Clinton: 41%
Trump: 33%
Johnson: 14%
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2016, 09:09:16 AM »

Before the anti-Hillary clowns leap on this, here's a reminder from four years back: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156139.0

In July 2012 Obama was only up 42-38 in a 3 way race with Johnson. Hillary will win NM comfortably.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2016, 09:23:29 AM »

Clinton +8 isn't that strange a result if she's up 2-3 points nationally at the moment.  I hope we get to see the head to head result too when the full cross tabs are released.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,175
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2016, 09:26:20 AM »

Before the anti-Hillary clowns leap on this, here's a reminder from four years back: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156139.0

In July 2012 Obama was only up 42-38 in a 3 way race with Johnson. Hillary will win NM comfortably.

I honestly wouldn't be so sure of that in my opinion. Trump will be moving towards the left to get his appeal up with Hispanics and I think he will extend an olive branch to them definitely making this state competitive.

no
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,624
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2016, 09:37:33 AM »

Before the anti-Hillary clowns leap on this, here's a reminder from four years back: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156139.0

In July 2012 Obama was only up 42-38 in a 3 way race with Johnson. Hillary will win NM comfortably.

I honestly wouldn't be so sure of that in my opinion. Trump will be moving towards the left to get his appeal up with Hispanics and I think he will extend an olive branch to them definitely making this state competitive.

I'm sure a couple more tweets of TRUMP eating from a Taco Bowl will make him competitive among Hispanics.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2016, 10:03:04 AM »

Is Johnson taking more from Trump or from Clinton?
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2016, 10:05:57 AM »

Johnson taking 14% probably means the same in Utah I would think.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,805
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2016, 10:42:18 AM »

Clinton should win NM by about 5 or 6.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,952


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2016, 11:25:10 AM »

Anyone who thinks New Mexico will be that close is delusional.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2016, 11:27:56 AM »

Before the anti-Hillary clowns leap on this, here's a reminder from four years back: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156139.0

In July 2012 Obama was only up 42-38 in a 3 way race with Johnson. Hillary will win NM comfortably.

I honestly wouldn't be so sure of that in my opinion. Trump will be moving towards the left to get his appeal up with Hispanics and I think he will extend an olive branch to them definitely making this state competitive.

It is not the matter of left/right at this point. In order to appeal to Hispanics, I am afraid, Trump will have to campaign against Donald Trump personally.
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2016, 12:59:30 PM »

Anyone who thinks New Mexico will be that close is delusional.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,175
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2016, 01:01:36 PM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2016, 01:20:28 PM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
It's an open election. History shows that Trump will likely outperform Romney. Romney was a terrible candidate.

As to the point of NM, thought, it's probably a lean D this cycle. Trump would win by a healthy margin if he took the state.
Logged
bumpercrop
Rookie
**
Posts: 49


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2016, 01:28:47 PM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
It's an open election. History shows that Trump will likely outperform Romney. Romney was a terrible candidate.

As to the point of NM, thought, it's probably a lean D this cycle. Trump would win by a healthy margin if he took the state.

And Trump is a good one?

LOL
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,579
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2016, 01:29:11 PM »

Obama won New Mexico by ten points.  Who in the right mind thinks Trump will outperform Romney?
It's an open election. History shows that Trump will likely outperform Romney. Romney was a terrible candidate.

As to the point of NM, thought, it's probably a lean D this cycle. Trump would win by a healthy margin if he took the state.
I don't think history is a good metric for Trump's support.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,175
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2016, 01:30:41 PM »

Atlas really has gone down the Nate Silver route of political analysis, hasn't it.  Sad.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2016, 03:15:23 PM »

Johnson was supposed to get a large chunk of the vote in 2012. He got 3.5%.

PPP will continue to be a joke as long as they keep including third parties.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 17, 2016, 03:16:41 PM »

Including third parties really does distort the result.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2016, 03:26:05 PM »

Where's the actual polling report? I would like to see the numbers without Johnson/Stein included (as that will be closer to reality).
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2016, 03:34:56 PM »

Hillary might approach 60% in this state.  By all accounts, it will be a bloodbath.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 17, 2016, 03:34:58 PM »

Or the race is much closer than people think? If we're so quick as to think New Mexico --> lots of Hispanics --> must be a large Trump lose, then our analysis is lazy and flawed. Gary Johnson takes about evenly from R's and D's.

I do think Clinton will win by more, but at the moment, Clinton has not united the party, Trump has (despite all the talk of politicians hating him, Republican voters like him, and that's what matters).
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 17, 2016, 03:45:03 PM »

Or the race is much closer than people think? If we're so quick as to think New Mexico --> lots of Hispanics --> must be a large Trump lose, then our analysis is lazy and flawed. Gary Johnson takes about evenly from R's and D's.

I do think Clinton will win by more, but at the moment, Clinton has not united the party, Trump has (despite all the talk of politicians hating him, Republican voters like him, and that's what matters).

There have been multiple AZ polls showing a close race. If Trump had united the party and/or Hispanics were not heavily against him, he'd be leading there easily.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,110
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 17, 2016, 05:11:13 PM »

I think Hillary will win by 8 or 9, but I guess that's wishful thinking.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 17, 2016, 05:27:54 PM »

New Mexico is not a swing state this year; Arizona is. In a good year for a Republican nominee, New Mexico is a swing state and Arizona isn't.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,856
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 17, 2016, 05:35:13 PM »
« Edited: May 17, 2016, 05:40:13 PM by Virginia »

New Mexico is not a swing state this year; Arizona is. In a good year for a Republican nominee, New Mexico is a swing state and Arizona isn't.

Not anymore. After this election, the GOP will be even worse off with Hispanics, and by 2020 New Mexico will have even less white people than it does this year. Republicans performance among Hispanics is simply too terrible at this point to be able to win that state short of anything but a mini-landslide win (55%+ I would guess), or perhaps more.

Arizona is primarily an option this cycle because the Republican candidate is set to perform exceptionally bad with the fastest growing demographic in Arizona. So bad that his candidacy is highly likely to heavily drive up turnout among that traditionally low-turnout group. It would take a really terrible Democrat and decent Republican opponent to put NM in play in the future, imo.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.