Oregon could be a swing state in 2016.

[LLR]

Nobody cares

[HAnnA MArin County]

So to say that Donald Trump could win Oregon because of, I don't know, angry granola and Birkenstock white liberals?, is okay, but to suggest that Hillary could win Arizona because of Hispanics/Latinos makes one a hack.

[This account no longer in use.]

I mean, he did win that one poll, but I won't buy it until I see sustainable polls. Until then, I think this is just as likely to be correct as those Utah polls showing Clinton winning.

[Fusionmunster]

Oregon: TRUMP beat Hillary Clout Research. 5/10-5/13 657 RV

http://cloutpolitical.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2016/05/OR-Statewide-Poll-Memorandum-5-18-2016.pdf

TRUMP 44.4% | Hillary 42.2% | Undecided 13% (657 RV)

So, It proves I was right. And HH(Hillary Hooligan) in Atlas were wrong

Your not right, one poll does not make you right. Dont be so obtuse.

[Mike Thick]

"Oregon could be a swing state in 2016!"

"You can't just play with numbers like that. It doesn't work that way."

"No, look at this poll! It proves I'm right!"

"It's one junk poll. It doesn't prove anything."

"But look at this poll!"

"That just doesn't make sense."

"Hack!"

[Fusionmunster]

"Oregon could be a swing state in 2016!"

"You can't just play with numbers like that. It doesn't work that way."

"No, look at this poll! It proves I'm right!"

"It's one junk poll. It doesn't prove anything."

"But look at this poll!"

"That just doesn't make sense."

"Hack!"

Statespolls goes into every thread and unskews like ive never seen done before on this forum. Im not giving him credit for calling something just because a questionable poll came out, and we had a Clinton +11 Oregon poll from a decent pollster released that hes completely ignored.

[Mike Thick]

"Oregon could be a swing state in 2016!"

"You can't just play with numbers like that. It doesn't work that way."

"No, look at this poll! It proves I'm right!"

"It's one junk poll. It doesn't prove anything."

"But look at this poll!"

"That just doesn't make sense."

"Hack!"

Statespolls goes into every thread and unskews like ive never seen done before on this forum. Im not giving him credit for calling something just because a questionable poll came out, and we had a Clinton +11 Oregon poll from a decent pollster released that hes completely ignored.

"Junk poll! Oregon will be swing state in 2016!"

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

[Virginiá]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

StatesPoll was a user months before your time, so you probably don't know that he was/is known for making ridiculous predictions based on completely bogus numbers. Like "Trump can win California if he only wins 8% more of the white vote", as if winning 8% more of the white vote was like walking out to get the mail.

There's no point in trying to reason with or debate him. He just cherry picks data and makes absurdly unrealistic calculations to justify his whack-job predictions. The funny thing is, he actually runs a site just for this (one that conveniently has posts that show Trump mostly in a good light, and omitting the vast majority of polls/data that show him losing)

In short, he's delusional and biased as hell.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

StatesPoll was a user months before your time, so you probably don't know that he was/is known for making ridiculous predictions based on completely bogus numbers. Like "Trump can win California if he only wins 8% more of the white vote", as if winning 8% more of the white vote was like walking out to get the mail.

There's no point in trying to reason with or debate him. He just cherry picks data and makes absurdly unrealistic calculations to justify his whack-job predictions. The funny thing is, he actually runs a site just for this (one that conveniently only has posts that show Trump is a good light, and omitting the vast majority of polls/data that show him losing)

In short, he's delusional and biased as hell.

Oh no, I already know, I just felt like saying that.

[Mike Thick]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

StatesPoll was a user months before your time, so you probably don't know that he was/is known for making ridiculous predictions based on completely bogus numbers. Like "Trump can win California if he only wins 8% more of the white vote", as if winning 8% more of the white vote was like walking out to get the mail.

There's no point in trying to reason with or debate him. He just cherry picks data and makes absurdly unrealistic calculations to justify his whack-job predictions. The funny thing is, he actually runs a site just for this (one that conveniently only has posts that show Trump is a good light, and omitting the vast majority of polls/data that show him losing)

In short, he's delusional and biased as hell.

Oh no, I already know, I just felt like saying that.

You have to admit, even if he's incoherent and deluded he's pretty entertaining.

[Ljube]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

StatesPoll was a user months before your time, so you probably don't know that he was/is known for making ridiculous predictions based on completely bogus numbers. Like "Trump can win California if he only wins 8% more of the white vote", as if winning 8% more of the white vote was like walking out to get the mail.

There's no point in trying to reason with or debate him. He just cherry picks data and makes absurdly unrealistic calculations to justify his whack-job predictions. The funny thing is, he actually runs a site just for this (one that conveniently has posts that show Trump mostly in a good light, and omitting the vast majority of polls/data that show him losing)

In short, he's delusional and biased as hell.

But wouldn't it be sweet if StatesPoll was proven right in the end, vindicated by the actual election results?

[This account no longer in use.]

Say, I wonder what would happen if someone were to post this on r/the_donald...

[Mike Thick]

Say, I wonder what would happen if someone were to post this on r/the_donald...

Why don't we find out?

[This account no longer in use.]

Done. Everybody upvote like hell.

[Fusionmunster]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

StatesPoll was a user months before your time, so you probably don't know that he was/is known for making ridiculous predictions based on completely bogus numbers. Like "Trump can win California if he only wins 8% more of the white vote", as if winning 8% more of the white vote was like walking out to get the mail.

There's no point in trying to reason with or debate him. He just cherry picks data and makes absurdly unrealistic calculations to justify his whack-job predictions. The funny thing is, he actually runs a site just for this (one that conveniently has posts that show Trump mostly in a good light, and omitting the vast majority of polls/data that show him losing)

In short, he's delusional and biased as hell.

But wouldn't it be sweet if StatesPoll was proven right in the end, vindicated by the actual election results?

We'll cross that bridge if we ever get to it.

[ProudModerate2]

StatesPoll, one junk poll does not a victory make.

StatesPoll was a user months before your time, so you probably don't know that he was/is known for making ridiculous predictions based on completely bogus numbers. Like "Trump can win California if he only wins 8% more of the white vote", as if winning 8% more of the white vote was like walking out to get the mail.

There's no point in trying to reason with or debate him. He just cherry picks data and makes absurdly unrealistic calculations to justify his whack-job predictions. The funny thing is, he actually runs a site just for this (one that conveniently has posts that show Trump mostly in a good light, and omitting the vast majority of polls/data that show him losing)

In short, he's delusional and biased as hell.

But wouldn't it be sweet if StatesPoll was proven right in the end, vindicated by the actual election results?

Can't wait to see StatesPoll's data and predictions on why trump will win D.C.
Reason number 1 ...... "trump can win D.C. because of his new Trump Intl Hotel that will open before the election, in September 2016."

[Mike Thick]

Done. Everybody upvote like hell.

Smith, you're a gift from God.

[This account no longer in use.]

"Trump is swinging his dick in the face of entitled liberals. I don't care what he does as president. I just want to make him liberals cry for 8 years. Make them cry. Make them suffer, Mr. Trump. We have been silenced for way too long. We are not going to take it anymore."

[Virginiá]

"Trump is swinging his dick in the face of entitled liberals. I don't care what he does as president. I just want to make him liberals cry for 8 years. Make them cry. Make them suffer, Mr. Trump. We have been silenced for way too long. We are not going to take it anymore."

That has to be the most ridiculous comment I read (out of the 4 or so that were there when I viewed it). "I don't care if Trump starts a war or ruins our economy, as long as those damn liberals are CRYING LIKE A DOG!"

btw, how come I can't up/downvote on there? Do I have to do something special to be able to do that?

[This account no longer in use.]

You need to subscribe.

[President Johnson]

Nobody cares

Until the morning of November 9 and we have President-elect TRUMP.

[ProudModerate2]

"Trump is swinging his dick in the face of entitled liberals. I don't care what he does as president. I just want to make him liberals cry for 8 years. Make them cry. Make them suffer, Mr. Trump. We have been silenced for way too long. We are not going to take it anymore."

Wow.
Nutty people.
And some here say we shouldn't "bash" the trump supporters for their "lack of intelligence."
On a scale, they fall somewhere between an earwig and a rock.

[President Johnson]

Ok, we shouldn't take the early polls too serious, but it clearly shows TRUMP's appeal. All the (media) talk that he gets defeated in a landslide is nonsense.We could really end up with something like this:

302 - 236

Btw, TRUMP could afford to lose either Virginia or Florida

[Ljube]

Ok, we shouldn't take the early polls too serious, but it clearly shows TRUMP's appeal. All the (media) talk that he gets defeated in a landslide is nonsense.We could really end up with something like this:

302 - 236

Btw, TRUMP could afford to lose either Virginia or Florida

Add Nevada to Trump.