Bernie Sanders Says US 'Kill List' Legal, Backs Troops in Syria

[Deportarian]

http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Bernie-Sanders-Says-US-Kill-List-Legal-Backs-Troops-in-Syria-20160426-0017.html

[Higgs]

That right-wing warmongerer is no different than Hillary, smfh.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

inb4 jfern

First of all, I don't agree with everything Bernie says. I openly disagree with him some here, which most Hillary supporters never seem to do with their candidate.

If you can be sure to kill just the terrorist, maybe it's not so bad, but the problem is bystanders. As for the troops, if they just stay in the Kurdish areas that's not so bad as going into the rest of Syria.

Now if he ever said he supported a no fly zone where Russian planes are flying, a position Hillary has repeatedly taken, including in the last debate, then I would be pretty worried.

[Mallow]

inb4 jfern

First of all, I don't agree with everything Bernie says. I openly disagree with him some here, which most Hillary supporters never seem to do with their candidate.

If you can be sure to kill just the terrorist, maybe it's not so bad, but the problem is bystanders. As for the troops, if they just stay in the Kurdish areas that's not so bad as going into the rest of Syria.

Now if he ever said he supported a no fly zone where Russian planes are flying, a position Hillary has repeatedly taken, including in the last debate, then I would be pretty worried.

This kind of argument is dumb (and wrong), and both Sanders and Clinton supporters are very, very guilty of it. "The other side is delusional/mindless sheep." No. You see what you want to see to fit in with your preconceived narrative (confirmation bias). People on here will defend their candidate of choice vigorously against what they perceive as unfair attacks, but just because during those arguments that you happen to get into with those people you don't see them criticize their own candidate (they're busy defending them!) doesn't mean they don't have disagreements. You're a perfect example--until today, I hadn't personally seen you disagree with anything Bernie said. But I'm not going to assume that just because I haven't seen it, it must mean you follow everything Bernie says like a sheep (and yes, there are plenty of Clinton supporters who do assume things like that, because it makes their narrative simpler just as your parallel argument makes your narrative simpler).

[Landslide Lyndon]

inb4 jfern

First of all, I don't agree with everything Bernie says.

Could've fooled us.

[For Trump, everything. For immigrants, the law]

inb4 jfern

First of all, I don't agree with everything Bernie says. I openly disagree with him some here, which most Hillary supporters never seem to do with their candidate.

If you can be sure to kill just the terrorist, maybe it's not so bad, but the problem is bystanders. As for the troops, if they just stay in the Kurdish areas that's not so bad as going into the rest of Syria.

Now if he ever said he supported a no fly zone where Russian planes are flying, a position Hillary has repeatedly taken, including in the last debate, then I would be pretty worried.

This kind of argument is dumb (and wrong), and both Sanders and Clinton supporters are very, very guilty of it. "The other side is delusional/mindless sheep." No. You see what you want to see to fit in with your preconceived narrative (confirmation bias). People on here will defend their candidate of choice vigorously against what they perceive as unfair attacks, but just because during those arguments that you happen to get into with those people you don't see them criticize their own candidate (they're busy defending them!) doesn't mean they don't have disagreements. You're a perfect example--until today, I hadn't personally seen you disagree with anything Bernie said. But I'm not going to assume that just because I haven't seen it, it must mean you follow everything Bernie says like a sheep (and yes, there are plenty of Clinton supporters who do assume things like that, because it makes their narrative simpler just as your parallel argument makes your narrative simpler).

Very well said. Too many people accuse everyone on the other side of being mindless idiots.

[Figueira]

inb4 jfern

First of all, I don't agree with everything Bernie says. I openly disagree with him some here, which most Hillary supporters never seem to do with their candidate.

If you can be sure to kill just the terrorist, maybe it's not so bad, but the problem is bystanders. As for the troops, if they just stay in the Kurdish areas that's not so bad as going into the rest of Syria.

Now if he ever said he supported a no fly zone where Russian planes are flying, a position Hillary has repeatedly taken, including in the last debate, then I would be pretty worried.

This kind of argument is dumb (and wrong), and both Sanders and Clinton supporters are very, very guilty of it. "The other side is delusional/mindless sheep." No. You see what you want to see to fit in with your preconceived narrative (confirmation bias). People on here will defend their candidate of choice vigorously against what they perceive as unfair attacks, but just because during those arguments that you happen to get into with those people you don't see them criticize their own candidate (they're busy defending them!) doesn't mean they don't have disagreements. You're a perfect example--until today, I hadn't personally seen you disagree with anything Bernie said. But I'm not going to assume that just because I haven't seen it, it must mean you follow everything Bernie says like a sheep (and yes, there are plenty of Clinton supporters who do assume things like that, because it makes their narrative simpler just as your parallel argument makes your narrative simpler).

Very well said. Too many people accuse everyone on the other side of being mindless idiots.

I can't count the number of times I've been called a brainless sheep for supporting Sanders, and I guess the equivalent on the other side is when people are accused of supporting Clinton "just because she's a woman" (which I'm fairly sure nobody actually does).

[The Night Owlditor]

inb4 jfern

First of all, I don't agree with everything Bernie says.

Could've fooled us.

He just hates Hillary more than he likes Sanders. George Wallace could be running against her and he would still continue to call her every name in the book. Guy's got some problems.