Clinton has released her first anti-Trump ad

[President Johnson]

Won't work. Just ask Marco.

[Figueira]

Won't work. Just ask Marco.

I missed the part when the general electorate became identical to the Republican primary electorate.

[ProudModerate2]

Won't work. Just ask Marco.

I missed the part when the general electorate became identical to the Republican primary electorate.

Exactly. Good point.
Look at the mess the Republican primary electorate has created within their own party.
They don't know what the hell they want as their candidate. Conservative ..... not conservative.
The general electorate will respond tremendously different, than how the many confused and wacky GOP voters have.
Absolute mess !

[Reaganfan]

The big problem liberals are having is that everything they are fighting for, isn't really possible.

For example, their definition of racism, can never be solved, because so many of them can find racism in anything. Obviously we cannot get rid of everything, so according to their definition, we will never get rid of "racism".

Also, they seem to be prioritizing emotional thinking over rational thinking. For example, they would rather take the risks with transgender bathrooms rather than hurt the feelings of transgender people. But doesn't the risk outweigh the reward? If women are hurt by sexual predators, are a majority of those victims and their families going to care about if a transvestite feels better about themselves? If a handful of Syrian refugees are terrorists, doesn't the risk of thousands of dead Americans outweigh the reward of happy refugees? If someone breaks in your house with a knife in their hand and you blow their skull apart with a shotgun, is that homeowner gonna be proud he protected his home or upset that he killed someone looking for money? I think they are trying the impossible.

It's a risk/reward situation and liberals lack the intellect to make safe decisions, because they are in and of themselves, weak people blinded by emotion. Thus their fear of inanimate objects (firearms), fear of conflict (anti-war), fear of wealth, and their constant running to their Government nanny. 

What do you think more Americans will do tomorrow? Say something politically incorrect, or quote a Maya Angelou poem?

[Joe Republic]

The big problem liberals are having is that everything they are fighting for, isn't really possible.

Yeah, remember that gay marriage nonsense?

[Kingpoleon]

"When someone shows you who they are, believe them."
- Hillary Clinton, unironically

[Mallow]

The big problem liberals are having is that everything they are fighting for, isn't really possible.

For example, their definition of racism, can never be solved, because so many of them can find racism in anything. Obviously we cannot get rid of everything, so according to their definition, we will never get rid of "racism".

Also, they seem to be prioritizing emotional thinking over rational thinking. For example, they would rather take the risks with transgender bathrooms rather than hurt the feelings of transgender people. But doesn't the risk outweigh the reward? If women are hurt by sexual predators, are a majority of those victims and their families going to care about if a transvestite feels better about themselves? If a handful of Syrian refugees are terrorists, doesn't the risk of thousands of dead Americans outweigh the reward of happy refugees? If someone breaks in your house with a knife in their hand and you blow their skull apart with a shotgun, is that homeowner gonna be proud he protected his home or upset that he killed someone looking for money? I think they are trying the impossible.

It's a risk/reward situation and liberals lack the intellect to make safe decisions, because they are in and of themselves, weak people blinded by emotion. Thus their fear of inanimate objects (firearms), fear of conflict (anti-war), fear of wealth, and their constant running to their Government nanny. 

What do you think more Americans will do tomorrow? Say something politically incorrect, or quote a Maya Angelou poem?

So basically what you're saying is "it's easier to make up strawman arguments and take them down than to actually make even the slightest effort to understand liberal positions." I guess if you assume a bunch of false sh*t about what people think and believe, it's pretty easy to discount them. Congrats on illustrating that point?

[IceSpear]

Won't work. Just ask Marco.

I missed the part when the general electorate became identical to the Republican primary electorate.

Senator Christine O'Donnell agrees.

[catographer]

This makes me happy as a Democrat because it reminds me that Trump is so easy to attack, I swear a toddler could make him look worse than it.

[Gustaf]

The big problem liberals are having is that everything they are fighting for, isn't really possible.

For example, their definition of racism, can never be solved, because so many of them can find racism in anything. Obviously we cannot get rid of everything, so according to their definition, we will never get rid of "racism".

Also, they seem to be prioritizing emotional thinking over rational thinking. For example, they would rather take the risks with transgender bathrooms rather than hurt the feelings of transgender people. But doesn't the risk outweigh the reward? If women are hurt by sexual predators, are a majority of those victims and their families going to care about if a transvestite feels better about themselves? If a handful of Syrian refugees are terrorists, doesn't the risk of thousands of dead Americans outweigh the reward of happy refugees? If someone breaks in your house with a knife in their hand and you blow their skull apart with a shotgun, is that homeowner gonna be proud he protected his home or upset that he killed someone looking for money? I think they are trying the impossible.

It's a risk/reward situation and liberals lack the intellect to make safe decisions, because they are in and of themselves, weak people blinded by emotion. Thus their fear of inanimate objects (firearms), fear of conflict (anti-war), fear of wealth, and their constant running to their Government nanny. 

What do you think more Americans will do tomorrow? Say something politically incorrect, or quote a Maya Angelou poem?

You think that is being rational? Lol.

[SillyAmerican]

Analyzing the ad subjectively: the music was a bit too fast, the Angelou quote isn't exactly a solid premise (because only those really close to Donald actually could have been witness to who he really is), the structure was fine, the mash-up was fine, it didn't hit as hard as it could have psychologically (as Trump ads do).

The ad was fine, but I imagine the response will probably be better, and will begin with Hillary giving the Maya Angelou quote, followed by her statements on various things that have since been proven to be untrue. It's amazing that the ad attacks have started more than 6 months out from the GE, even before either candidate has clinched the nomination of their party; it's going to be a very, very long season, and it's going to get very ugly very fast. Please, find a seat and help yourself to some popcorn.