WTHR indiana poll: trump and clinton with modest leads (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:19:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  WTHR indiana poll: trump and clinton with modest leads (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WTHR indiana poll: trump and clinton with modest leads  (Read 4058 times)
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« on: April 22, 2016, 12:12:23 PM »

37% is a pretty weak showing for Trump. He's being saved by the vote splitting among his opponents.  
The way the state allocates, one vote more than Cruz will get Trump the 30 statewide delegates. It's then three delegates each for the 9 CDs.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2016, 03:32:04 PM »

And in what area is Trump going to get such a huge block of votes in Indiana as he did in Cook County Illinois, in one spot, to put him over the top?

The Northwest part of the state from Whiting to South Bend. I expect them to vote like the Chicago suburbs did. Also I expect Trump to do very well in the Southwest part of the state between the Ohio and Wabash Rivers as it is a very Catholic region and ancestral Democratic, plus the counties along the Ohio River.

You think Trump, by himself, is going to get 120,000+ votes from just that one area of Indiana?

I have no idea what the exact numbers are going to be there, but I do expect the percentages to look like they did in the Chicago area.
I agree with Gass' analysis. Indiana to me is more Downstate Illinois/Chicago Burbs than Wisconsin.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.