Theory behind Jeb Bush's run
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 10, 2025, 11:33:39 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Theory behind Jeb Bush's run
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Theory behind Jeb Bush's run  (Read 651 times)
C r a b c a k e
CrabCake
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,114
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 22, 2016, 06:34:54 AM »

He was actually running to help W's legacy on Google search, and he played us for chumps.

Now if you type 'Bush gua" into Google you get "Bush Guacamole" rather than the more incriminating "Bush Guantanamo".
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,728
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2016, 07:33:41 AM »

He was actually running to help W's legacy on Google search, and he played us for chumps.

Now if you type 'Bush gua" into Google you get "Bush Guacamole" rather than the more incriminating "Bush Guantanamo".

This was a sound strategy at certain levels.  The GOP needed to improve the public perception of Bush 43 if they were going to be competitive in the Presidential race. 

Ironically, the campaign brought out just how much constituencies within the GOP disliked Bush 43, and the Bushes in general.  Bush 43's standing appears to have gone up in the eyes of moderates and independents, but down in the eyes of Republicans, who blame him for their woes much in the manner 1970s Democrats blamed LBJ for their party's problems.
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2016, 04:52:19 PM »

i got brush guard as my first result and bush Guantanamo as my third result
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,679
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2016, 09:41:24 PM »

He was actually running to help W's legacy on Google search, and he played us for chumps.

Now if you type 'Bush gua" into Google you get "Bush Guacamole" rather than the more incriminating "Bush Guantanamo".

And Ted Cruz hates avocados.  Think about it and it all fits together.
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2016, 09:50:56 PM »

He was actually running to help W's legacy on Google search, and he played us for chumps.

Now if you type 'Bush gua" into Google you get "Bush Guacamole" rather than the more incriminating "Bush Guantanamo".

This was a sound strategy at certain levels.  The GOP needed to improve the public perception of Bush 43 if they were going to be competitive in the Presidential race. 

Ironically, the campaign brought out just how much constituencies within the GOP disliked Bush 43, and the Bushes in general.  Bush 43's standing appears to have gone up in the eyes of moderates and independents, but down in the eyes of Republicans, who blame him for their woes much in the manner 1970s Democrats blamed LBJ for their party's problems.
It is amazing the amount of damage the 2nd Bush/Cheney term inflicted upon the GOP.  Even before the devastating 2008 housing and market crash.  I remember Cheney saying we don't need huge support for what we do, we just need 50% plus 1.  And Bush, right after the 2004 election saying I have political capital, just like after the 2000 election, and I intend to use it to get things done.  Acting like they did not care at all for the future of the GOP.  Like they had their mandate, and that was all that mattered.  I knew they were being too cocky.  And God, are we now paying the price!
Logged
Tokugawa Sexgod Ieyasu
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 37,623


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2016, 11:30:46 PM »
« Edited: April 22, 2016, 11:34:54 PM by What shall make their sap ascend? »

There was a Weekly Standard piece on one of the people from Jeb!'s team (I don't make a habit of reading the Weekly Standard but in this case I was on their website because I was thinking of citing something they said about Rubio's religious beliefs in a paper) where he basically said that Jeb! wasn't really running to win but just wanted to file a minority report, as it were, or create a basis for growth in future elections, of a 'politics of optimism' to counteract the nihilistic anger that he saw brewing in the GOP. Allegedly his main strategic error was assigning Cruz to the role that Trump ended up filling. He also apparently really dislikes and feels betrayed by Rubio because Rubio 'cut in line' and horned in on Jeb!'s turf by running in the same cycle--this is the sort of thing that supposedly matters a lot in the Florida GOP. I took the article with a grain of salt on Jeb!'s overall strategy, because there are any number of reasons why his people would have wanted to spin things after the fact to make the campaign look like less of a disaster, but I'm inclined to believe the stuff about his relationship with Rubio.
Logged
Lyin' Steve
SteveMcQueen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2016, 11:36:31 PM »

Why would they give Right To Rise $100MM just to repair the Bush legacy?  Jeb's ads didn't do anything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 10 queries.