VA-Monmouth: Clinton +27, Trump +14

[Zache]

PDF link

Clinton 60%
Sanders 33%

Donald Trump 41%
Marco Rubio 27%
Ted Cruz 14%
John Kasich 7%
Ben Carson 7%

[RI]

Uh... the GOP results are

Trump 41
Rubio 27
Cruz 14
Kasich/Carson 7

Your numbers are for a different question about upsets

[IceSpear]

Well, so much for Bernie SHOCKING US ALL in VA.

Isn't this supposed to be one of Rube's best states? This guy has been handed the nomination on a platter multiple times, only for him to flip the platter over and start stomping on it. Terrible candidate. The media and the establishment picked the wrong horse and refuse to admit it. They should be ashamed of themselves.

[Zache]

Uh... the GOP results are

Trump 41
Rubio 27
Cruz 14
Kasich/Carson 7

Your numbers are for a different question about upsets

Sorry about that. Ctrl + V'd from somewhere else without checking the PDF.

[RI]

New Poll: Virginia President by Monmouth University on 2016-02-24

Summary:

Trump:	41%
Rubio:	27%
Cruz:	14%
Carson:	7%
Kasich:	7%
Other:	0%
Undecided:	4%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Mehmentum]

I buy this.  Appalachia and the military bases in the east should both be very good for Trump.  Rubio is over performing his national support as suspected, but it won't be nearly enough.

The state is a profoundly bad fit for Sanders.  Lots of African Americans and the Democratic whites are far from working class, not to mention Clinton is running ads basically unopposed.

[RJEvans]

So Clinton above 60% in SC, AL, AR, GA, TN, TX and VA? What are the chances?

[Holmes]

So Clinton above 60% in SC, AL, AR, GA, TN, TX and VA? What are the chances?

80%. Only state she might be under 60% is in Tennessee.

[F_S_USATN]

Trump even within striking distance in NOVA 35-31

[EliteLX]

This race is so over it's not even funny lol

[President Johnson]

RIP Mr. Rubot.

[Lief 🗽]

I don't really buy this poll but if it's true then the race is over on Tuesday. Wow.

[HillOfANight]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This seems overly restrictive and is probably understating Trump and overstating Clinton. What about people that first voted in a general in 2012? Or people that are just now inspired to vote for the first time?

[Crumpets]

"Likely Clinton"

[Ebsy]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

This seems overly restrictive and is probably understating Trump and overstating Clinton. What about people that first voted in a general in 2012? Or people that are just now inspired to vote for the first time?

You might have a point on the Republican side, but Iowa and Nevada both indicated that more restrictive voter screens proved more accurate on the Democratic side.