TX-KTVT/CBS11/Dixie Strategies:D: Clinton 61% Sanders 29%; R: Cruz 33% Trump 25%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:10:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  TX-KTVT/CBS11/Dixie Strategies:D: Clinton 61% Sanders 29%; R: Cruz 33% Trump 25%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX-KTVT/CBS11/Dixie Strategies:D: Clinton 61% Sanders 29%; R: Cruz 33% Trump 25%  (Read 2048 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 24, 2016, 06:23:34 PM »

KTVT/CBS11/Dixie Strategies poll of Texas, conducted Feb. 22:

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2016/02/24/cruz-increases-lead-in-tx-against-trump-in-ktvt-cbs-11-dixie-strategies-poll/




Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2016, 06:26:32 PM »
« Edited: February 24, 2016, 06:45:46 PM by Ronnie »

Trump shouldn't be too upset if and when he loses this state.  At least it should keep the field wide for a bit longer.  Cruz would have no reason to drop out if he wins a state and Rubio doesn't.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,803
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2016, 06:27:05 PM »

What's up with all these Texas polls? I thought only Michigan had a ton of crappy pollsters.

Trump shouldn't be too upset if and when he loses this state.  At least it should keep the field wide for a bit longer.  Cruz would have no reason to drop out of he wins a state and Rubio doesn't.

Cruz has already won a state. It's Marcobot who is still virgin.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2016, 06:27:37 PM »

Junk Poll!!!
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,763


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2016, 06:33:54 PM »

New Poll: Texas President by Dixie Strategies on 2016-02-22

Summary:
Cruz:
33%
Trump:
25%
Rubio:
15%
Kasich:
8%
Carson:
6%
Other:
0%
Undecided:
13%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2016, 06:40:02 PM »

Would be awful for Sanders if true.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2016, 07:18:10 PM »

Okay so barring further implosion Cruz will take Texas. Let's see if he can somehow take neighboring Oklahoma and Arkansas with it at least and further blunt the Donald. Every state he loses on ST the more drawn out this will be.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2016, 07:31:09 PM »

They should keep going with the decimals. For a rational number, eventually you get a repeating decimal sequence. You can put a line over that sequence to indicate this. Then it's exact.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2016, 07:47:00 PM »

Bernt Out.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2016, 04:20:30 AM »

Wow... that number for Sanders is horrible. I'm expecting him to hit the mid-40s here.... but anything like this? Yikes.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,645
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2016, 04:48:51 AM »

We felt the Bern.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2016, 05:35:19 AM »

Where do you even dig up these junk polls?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2016, 08:36:26 AM »

Is Texas a good analogue for any other state? The state straddles regions. Eastern Texas is Dixie; Far South Texas and El Paso have more in common with New Mexico than with any other parts of Texas; the Panhandle is practically Midwestern.  Your guess is as good as mine of the Dallas-San Antonio-Galveston triangle...  Florida?
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2016, 08:43:03 AM »

Texas, despite being the 2nd most populous state, also happens to be one of the hardest States to poll for anything.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2016, 08:56:11 AM »

Wow... that number for Sanders is horrible. I'm expecting him to hit the mid-40s here.... but anything like this? Yikes.

Sanders number in recent polls has been everywhere from the high 20's to low 40's. Really have no clue where things are in this race. 538 is projecting a 66.1-30.7% Clinton win, which would not be pretty for Sanders.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2016, 10:57:39 AM »

Wow... that number for Sanders is horrible. I'm expecting him to hit the mid-40s here.... but anything like this? Yikes.

Sanders number in recent polls has been everywhere from the high 20's to low 40's. Really have no clue where things are in this race. 538 is projecting a 66.1-30.7% Clinton win, which would not be pretty for Sanders.

I don't know why Nate's projections don't at least equal 99% between the two. It's not like other candidates will receive 3% of the vote combined.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2016, 03:15:03 PM »

Texas, despite being the 2nd most populous state, also happens to be one of the hardest States to poll for anything.

True -- huge population, huge regional divides, and much ethnic diversity. 
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2016, 05:10:42 PM »

lol. It's almost as if Nevada has single-handedly taken us back to 2014 with regards to Hillary's polling.

If Hillary becomes president, she should transfer Yucca Mountain to NH to show her gratitude.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2016, 05:31:22 PM »

lol. It's almost as if Nevada has single-handedly taken us back to 2014 with regards to Hillary's polling.

If Hillary becomes president, she should transfer Yucca Mountain to NH to show her gratitude.
All she needed was a solid victory to get her mojo back.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 14 queries.