The Judicial Branch (Supreme Court) PASSED

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

I encourage everyone who has even a vague idea about making a change to the Court to speak up

I suppose I have vague ideas, but not really anything substantive yet.

Finding some way to increase the number of cases would be great, but I'm also unsure on how to do it. Perhaps involving GM activity? That would probably open the door to controversy, not that that would be entirely bad.

I'd be open to some sort of radical change here, as long as it would actually help matters without causing too many more problems. I likewise have no objection to simply accepting the status quo with a minor tweak or two and then carrying on to the next topic.

How would you envision the GM activity lead to more court activity?

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

Fixed

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

Essentially a Federal-Regional partnership regarding the judicial branch is what's being proposed. I'm open to the idea but we need a mechanism to limit conflicts of interest that could happen between between the the courts.

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

1. Plan B
2. Plan C
3. Plan A

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

Should the Justices elect a Chief Justice from one of the two Associate Justices? Or should it be by appointment?

Should be elected amongst the justices.

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

None of the above. Names of specific citizens shouldn't be in the constitution. If I'm thinking in error I will consider changing my vote.

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

1. B
2. A