SC DEM (Monmouth): Clinton +29
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:32:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SC DEM (Monmouth): Clinton +29		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SC DEM (Monmouth): Clinton +29  (Read 751 times)
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 18, 2016, 11:47:11 AM »
SC Dem: Safe Clinton

Clinton 59
Sanders 30

Favorable / Unfavorable:
Clinton 76 / 14
Sanders 61 / 17

Independents: Sanders 46 / 43
Self-Identified DEMS: Clinton 65 / 24

White voters under 50: Sanders 48 / Clinton 44
Black voters under 50: Clinton 60 / Sanders 26

Black voters over 50: Clinton 69 / Sanders 12
White voters over 50: Clinton 59 / Sanders 39

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/0d2797d9-672e-4af0-963c-4462f3db9b19.pdf
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2016, 11:48:49 AM »
Dominating!
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2016, 12:15:56 PM »
Junk poll!
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2016, 12:30:47 PM »

Wise words, EH.

The Clinton cronies at Monmouth strike again!
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,720
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2016, 12:33:26 PM »
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2016, 02:33:38 PM »
It's a little easy, and, well, absolutely exasperating, that y'all would shout "Junk poll!" at EVERY SINGLE DAMN FUKCING POLL posted here, and just move on not providing with any reason whatsoever why that might be the case. And I don't really ask you for your reasons, cause these would probably only be EVEN MORE exasperating. Can't you just admit that Sanders is pretty far in SC, and that some polls are showing him 20 pts behind, and some polls are showing him 30 pts behind, LIKE THEY FUKCING SHOULD BE.

GEEZ!
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2016, 02:52:05 PM »
Was it them or Loras College that showed a 30 point lead for Clinton in Iowa (I'm not saying Sanders has a shot here because I'm pretty sure Clinton's lead is insurmountable).
Logged
Illuminati Blood Drinker
phwezer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.42, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2016, 02:54:10 PM »
Quote from: Flo on February 18, 2016, 02:52:05 PM
Was it them or Loras College that showed a 30 point lead for Clinton in Iowa (I'm not saying Sanders has a shot here because I'm pretty sure Clinton's lead is insurmountable).
I'm pretty sure that was Loras.
Logged
A Perez
Rookie
**
Posts: 231
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2016, 03:00:24 PM »
Quote from: Flo on February 18, 2016, 02:52:05 PM
Was it them or Loras College that showed a 30 point lead for Clinton in Iowa (I'm not saying Sanders has a shot here because I'm pretty sure Clinton's lead is insurmountable).

Monmouth's final Iowa poll was Clinton by 5%.Not too bad. Their NH prediction was very bad though. Sanders +10.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,166
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2016, 04:13:18 PM »
Quote from: Watermelon sin Jamón on February 18, 2016, 02:33:38 PM
It's a little easy, and, well, absolutely exasperating, that y'all would shout "Junk poll!" at EVERY SINGLE DAMN FUKCING POLL posted here, and just move on not providing with any reason whatsoever why that might be the case. And I don't really ask you for your reasons, cause these would probably only be EVEN MORE exasperating. Can't you just admit that Sanders is pretty far in SC, and that some polls are showing him 20 pts behind, and some polls are showing him 30 pts behind, LIKE THEY FUKCING SHOULD BE.

GEEZ!

Yeah, in all honesty, Bernie hacks should calm down.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2016, 04:10:39 AM »
Why are so many saying junk poll? This only has her doing a few points better than the average.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 13 queries.