In 1992, WHy did Perot do so well in ME? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:19:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  In 1992, WHy did Perot do so well in ME? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In 1992, WHy did Perot do so well in ME?  (Read 3827 times)
afcassidy
Rookie
**
Posts: 48


« on: June 06, 2005, 08:28:25 PM »


Yeah, I agree with the other posters on here.  New England just loves outsiders and moderates. 

You can see it in how well John McCain did in the NH Primary in 2000.  Maine was also among Nader's best states in 2000 (5.7%), Perot's best state in 1996 (14.19%).  Eugene McCarthy also scored one of his best showings there in 1976 with 2.25% of the vote. 

John Anderson's best states in 1980 were (in order) Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and Connecticut.  Two of Barry Commoner's top 5 states were Maine and Vermont.

It must be something in the water. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.