SC-ARG Tracking Thread (WARNING: Possible fraud)

[Eraserhead]

Glorious news-- especially good to see Clinton with a solid lead among whites and men.

There goes all the claptrap about Clinton being in danger...

Except it's ARG so...

[Eraserhead]

They were terrible on the Democratic side in NH though. Their final poll was Clinton +9.

[Eraserhead]

They were terrible on the Democratic side in NH though. Their final poll was Clinton +9.

What? Do you mean -9?

Yes, my bad (or Sanders +9).

[Eraserhead]

Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.

You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.

Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.

Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.

LOL, is Chuck Todd really that much of a fat moron? If you're going to operate under ridiculous assumptions, then it would be a much better one to split them the same way as IA, not Bernie's quasi home state.

New Hampshire is not Bernie's quasi home state.

[Eraserhead]

ARG did put out a Sanders 54/Clinton 38 poll as their final NH poll.

Nope, ARG's final poll was Sanders 53/Clinton 44. They were way off.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_presidential_primary-3351.html

[Eraserhead]

vs. their last poll:

Clinton -4
Sanders +4

[Eraserhead]

The real question is why everyone forgot Nevada exists.

They're just afraid to poll it.