SC-ARG Tracking Thread (WARNING: Possible fraud)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:42:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SC-ARG Tracking Thread (WARNING: Possible fraud)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Author Topic: SC-ARG Tracking Thread (WARNING: Possible fraud)  (Read 10459 times)
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,027
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: February 14, 2016, 02:08:23 AM »

If Kasich is truly in 2nd that would be a massive boost to Kasich's campaign. It proves he can at least campaign in the South.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: February 14, 2016, 02:14:28 AM »

They were terrible on the Democratic side in NH though. Their final poll was Clinton +9.
What? Do you mean -9?

Yes, my bad (or Sanders +9).
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: February 14, 2016, 02:59:33 AM »

Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.

You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.

Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.

Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: February 14, 2016, 03:05:39 AM »

Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.

You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.

Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.

Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.

LOL, is Chuck Todd really that much of a fat moron? If you're going to operate under ridiculous assumptions, then it would be a much better one to split them the same way as IA, not Bernie's quasi home state.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: February 14, 2016, 03:10:35 AM »

Automatically assigning Sanders 60% of whites seems like a foolish enterprise if there ever was one.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: February 14, 2016, 03:25:47 AM »

RIP Hillary, Trump and Kasich.

Good news for Sanders and Cruz though.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: February 14, 2016, 03:26:28 AM »

RIP Hillary, Trump and Kasich.

Good news for Sanders and Cruz though.

Too many Blaxicasians polled!
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: February 14, 2016, 03:45:21 AM »

Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.

You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.

Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.

Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.

LOL, is Chuck Todd really that much of a fat moron? If you're going to operate under ridiculous assumptions, then it would be a much better one to split them the same way as IA, not Bernie's quasi home state.

He probably is.. but here's the tweets that inspired my comments on him..

"A little back of the envelope math for SC Dem primary: if Sanders wins 61% of white vote (as he did in NH) he needs 43% of black vote to win

Will have a lot more on the math to focus on in both races on tomorrow's @meetthepress

In the last NBC/WSJ/Marist SC poll, Clinton led Sanders among blacks 74-17... he has a lot of work to do."

Guys like Chuck Todd are in the business of creating horseraces. It's more exciting that way. Todd probably has his MTP job until Luke Russert gets seasoned enough to that that job.

Todd's the guy that bitched all night during IA that "Hillary declared too victory too early" or some BS like that.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: February 14, 2016, 04:05:28 AM »

CBS/YouGov will have new polls out later today (I guess for NV and SC and/or a few ST states) and I'd trust those numbers more than a silly ARG poll.

After all, CBS/YouGov was within 2% in both IA and NH on the Democratic side.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: February 14, 2016, 04:20:48 AM »

RIP Hillary, Trump and Kasich.

Good news for Sanders and Cruz though.

Too many Blaxicasians polled!

Obviously
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: February 14, 2016, 04:59:28 AM »

Also, once Kasich leaves office in OH, he's free to note that he quietly bought ARG and molded it to be a polling outlet designed to produce pro-Kasich polls.

As for YouGov. Are they gonna release polls whose Margin of Error is under 7% this time?
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: February 14, 2016, 05:52:56 AM »
« Edited: February 14, 2016, 05:56:39 AM by President Johnson »

Great poll for both sides. TRUMP and Hillary ahead. And Kasich surging to second place. LOVE IT! GO JOHN! And Rafael is down, just fantastic.
Logged
Ex-Assemblyman Steelers
Steelers
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 371
Serbia and Montenegro


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: February 14, 2016, 08:20:27 AM »

This H babies still crying?
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: February 14, 2016, 08:36:05 AM »

Automatically assigning Sanders 60% of whites seems like a foolish enterprise if there ever was one.

That's what the crosstabs for the most recent poll prior to this one said, so it's not that ridiculous. If this poll is closer to the truth, than there's barely any point in even doing the math. But we don't have enough convergence between polls (yet) to rule it out.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,676
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: February 14, 2016, 12:36:50 PM »

Its ARG  for Christ's sake. Immolate.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: February 14, 2016, 01:56:44 PM »

I deleted the comment, because it didn't come off the way I intended.  I was being sarcastically over the top and suggesting that a black person voting for Clinton would be self-destructive.  Not good judgement on my part.  Sorry. 
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,247
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: February 14, 2016, 08:20:29 PM »

Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.

You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.

Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.

Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.

LOL, is Chuck Todd really that much of a fat moron? If you're going to operate under ridiculous assumptions, then it would be a much better one to split them the same way as IA, not Bernie's quasi home state.

He probably is.. but here's the tweets that inspired my comments on him..

"A little back of the envelope math for SC Dem primary: if Sanders wins 61% of white vote (as he did in NH) he needs 43% of black vote to win

Will have a lot more on the math to focus on in both races on tomorrow's @meetthepress

In the last NBC/WSJ/Marist SC poll, Clinton led Sanders among blacks 74-17... he has a lot of work to do."

Guys like Chuck Todd are in the business of creating horseraces. It's more exciting that way. Todd probably has his MTP job until Luke Russert gets seasoned enough to that that job.

Todd's the guy that bitched all night during IA that "Hillary declared too victory too early" or some BS like that.

What exactly is you guys' problem with what he said. He didn't say, or assume, that Sanders would get certain demographic numbers. He said "if this, then this." Is he wrong or not about that statement. If he's not, you have no basis for such harsh (and probably ignorant) criticism.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: February 14, 2016, 08:25:03 PM »

Lol whites are not voting for Clinton ARRRRGGG.

You know SC whites are different to NH and IA whites don't you? I don't expect Clinton to win whites in the end, but it won't be the blow-out it was in those contests.

Chuck Todd trying to do envelope math and starting by giving Sanders the same % of whites in SC and NH is amusingly stupid.

Plus, there's gonna be a chunk of voters that are going to end up voting in the R primary on 2/20 and unable to vote in the D Primary on 2/27.

LOL, is Chuck Todd really that much of a fat moron? If you're going to operate under ridiculous assumptions, then it would be a much better one to split them the same way as IA, not Bernie's quasi home state.

New Hampshire is not Bernie's quasi home state.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: February 14, 2016, 08:37:26 PM »

How did ARG do with NH polling? Yea not so well (Sanders leading by only single digits). If TRUMP wins here it's done , it's over he's the nominee.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: February 14, 2016, 10:33:03 PM »

ARG did put out a Sanders 54/Clinton 38 poll as their final NH poll.

Suffolk and Monmonth had it at Sanders +9 or +10.

And considering some polls had Sanders up by 30 going into the primary, one could indict at least half the NH pollsters for not getting reasonably close to +22.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: February 15, 2016, 12:44:55 AM »

ARG did put out a Sanders 54/Clinton 38 poll as their final NH poll.

Nope, ARG's final poll was Sanders 53/Clinton 44. They were way off.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_presidential_primary-3351.html
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: February 15, 2016, 03:33:38 AM »

oh okay, didn't notice that poll came in late...

i'd imagine the people answering phone calls from strangers the day before the NH primary to be slightly different than an overall population
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,502
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: February 15, 2016, 08:43:31 AM »

They were way off on the dem side but their GOP one was one of the most accurate
Logged
A Perez
Rookie
**
Posts: 231
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: February 16, 2016, 09:11:38 PM »

Sanders is toast in SC.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: February 16, 2016, 09:12:50 PM »

Nooooo!!! Not ARG!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 13 queries.