|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2020, 06:43:19 PM
News:

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IA-Monmouth: Clinton up 5
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: IA-Monmouth: Clinton up 5  (Read 1453 times)
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,223
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 28, 2016, 11:19:56 AM »
« edited: January 28, 2016, 11:27:11 AM by Castro »

Clinton - 47% (-8%)
Sanders - 42% (+9%)
O'Malley - 6% (No Change)

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/f94fe349-47c3-4af3-86b9-5f50e362d1ec.pdf
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,529
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2016, 11:24:40 AM »

Looking good for Clinton in these closing days. Just need to see what Selzer says on Saturday.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2016, 11:25:08 AM »

Clinton was up 22 points by Monmouth in December. Not the best trajectory for Clinton, but I still think she's pulls out a narrow win.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,565
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2016, 11:32:23 AM »

DOMINATING!
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 8,351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2016, 11:34:06 AM »

As noted before, every poll of Iowa is really a guess at the turnout scenario. The Clinton+5 number assumes a turnout of 110,000.  They also mapped out a couple of other higher turnout scenarios:


150,000 voters:
Clinton 46%
Sanders 43%

200,000 voters:
Clinton 45%
Sanders 44%
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,223
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2016, 11:36:35 AM »

110,000 seems somewhat small.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2016, 11:45:02 AM »


A 17% collapse in the course of a month isn't really dominating.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,234
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2016, 11:49:23 AM »

Iowa is a must win for Sanders and this does not look good for him. And considering that this caucus is all about geography, it's a big plus that Clinton is better organized.

One thing that is telling is that Sanders did not start performing well in Iowa until after the data breach. Looks like that might not have been enough.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,565
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2016, 12:08:19 PM »


A 17% collapse in the course of a month isn't really dominating.

Beating your opponent in one of his top five states, demographically, certainly is.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,223
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2016, 12:10:17 PM »

Iowa really is going to be one of those races where the only poll that matters is on caucus day. With DMR likely to show a statistically tied race in its final poll, the results of Iowa are going to depend mostly on turnout levels and ground game.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 43,752
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2016, 12:28:21 PM »

Damn, I expected that Clinton would have a double digit margin in this poll...
Logged
Clamdick McClaw
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,074
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2016, 12:30:23 PM »

As noted before, every poll of Iowa is really a guess at the turnout scenario. The Clinton+5 number assumes a turnout of 110,000.  They also mapped out a couple of other higher turnout scenarios:


150,000 voters:
Clinton 46%
Sanders 43%

200,000 voters:
Clinton 45%
Sanders 44%

100,000?  Lower than 2004?  LOLOLOLOLOL! 
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 43,752
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2016, 12:43:19 PM »

This poll also has Clinton and Sanders nearly tied among men. Heh.
Logged
Clamdick McClaw
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,074
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2016, 12:57:38 PM »

This poll also has Clinton and Sanders nearly tied among men. Heh.

Does it?

Lolz.

Can I get a JUNK POLL!?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,529
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2016, 01:21:33 PM »


Here you go.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -3.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2016, 01:53:11 PM »
« Edited: January 28, 2016, 02:57:54 PM by Sorenroy »


Gave me a chuckle m8.

Anyway here are the specific numbers:

Men:
Sanders - 46% (+4)
Clinton - 43% (-4)

Women:
Clinton - 50% (-11)
Sanders - 38 (+11)

Favorabilities:
Candidate - Favorable-Unfavorable (Net)
Sanders - 85-9 (+76)
Clinton - 78-17 (+61)
O'Malley - 50-14 (+36)

Edit: My mistake, women voters are 50-38 Clinton. Thanks Eraserhead, it has been fixed.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 43,752
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2016, 02:34:10 PM »


Gave me a chuckle m8.

Anyway here are the specific numbers:

Men:
Sanders - 46% (+4)
Clinton - 43% (-4)

Women:
Clinton - 58% (-11)
Sanders - 38 (+11)

Favorabilities:
Candidate - Favorable-Unfavorable (Net)
Sanders - 85-9 (+76)
Clinton - 78-17 (+61)
O'Malley - 50-14 (+36)

Clinton is at 50% among women, not 58%.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,949
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2016, 06:28:03 PM »


A 17% collapse in the course of a month isn't really dominating.

Beating your opponent in one of his top five states, demographically, certainly is.

Yeah, people really don't seem to realize that Iowa should be Bernie country. Bernie losing it would be equivalent to Clinton losing a Deep South state.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 28, 2016, 09:11:58 PM »

Looking good for Clinton in these closing days. Just need to see what Selzer says on Saturday.

Looking good?? She's collapsing.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,529
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 28, 2016, 09:21:54 PM »

Looking good for Clinton in these closing days. Just need to see what Selzer says on Saturday.

Looking good?? She's collapsing.

I mean, you can call it what you want, but it's pretty clear. One person is winning, and the other one isn't. Sorry, I guess?
Logged
Clamdick McClaw
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,074
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 28, 2016, 09:42:22 PM »

Looking good for Clinton in these closing days. Just need to see what Selzer says on Saturday.

Looking good?? She's collapsing.

I mean, you can call it what you want, but it's pretty clear. One person is winning, and the other one isn't. Sorry, I guess?

Much higher respected QUINNIPIAC has Bernie up 4.  Sorry, Nikki Minasgh.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 43,752
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 28, 2016, 09:56:58 PM »

I don't really get how either side can be confident of victory when they look at this.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-iowa-presidential-democratic-caucus

It's a complete tossup.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 48,144


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 28, 2016, 10:28:22 PM »

I don't really get how either side can be confident of victory when they look at this.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-iowa-presidential-democratic-caucus

It's a complete tossup.

True, we find out Monday.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,949
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 28, 2016, 10:29:07 PM »

I don't really get how either side can be confident of victory when they look at this.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-iowa-presidential-democratic-caucus

It's a complete tossup.

I'm pretty sure the people acting confident of victory are trolling.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,529


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2016, 10:30:38 PM »

If only this f**** thing had been on January 4 like it was supposed to be.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 12 queries.