NC: PPP: Clinton and Sanders trail all Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 15, 2024, 09:33:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NC: PPP: Clinton and Sanders trail all Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC: PPP: Clinton and Sanders trail all Republicans  (Read 2188 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,868


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 20, 2016, 03:41:35 PM »

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_NC_12016.pdf

Clinton 42, Rubio 47
Clinton 43, Bush 45
Clinton 43, Trump 45
Clinton 43, Cruz 46
Clinton 44, Carson 47

Sanders 38, Cruz 43
Sanders 39, Rubio 43
Sanders 40, Carson 44
Sanders 41, Bush 42
Sanders 43, Trump 44

Clinton 39, Trump 43, Deez Nuts 10
Clinton 40, Trump 41, Bloomberg 10
Clinton 40, Trump 42, Webb 7
Clinton 41, Trump 45, Bug the Cat 7
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2016, 03:42:40 PM »

The real news is that Bug the Cat is trailing Deez Nuts... what a shame.

#bug2k16
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,930
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2016, 04:56:32 PM »

Republicans need to win North Carolina by about 6% to have a chance of winning overall. This poll gives me much hope for the 2016 Presidential election as a Democratic victory. 
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 91,374
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2016, 05:00:48 PM »

Well, it seems as though Dems are gonna win the 290 track or 272 track, with victories in NC & FL unattainable.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,038
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2016, 06:46:03 PM »

Pretty respectable numbers for Bernie and Hillary.
Logged
Hillary pays minimum wage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2016, 09:20:39 PM »

I made a thread similar to this.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,396
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2016, 05:26:47 PM »

Not terrible numbers, considering NC's Republican lean. If NC is at all in question at the time of the election, odds are the Democrats will win.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,248
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2016, 06:50:57 PM »



CLINTON:
Clinton 42, Rubio 47 (R+5)
Clinton 43, Bush 45 (R+2)
Clinton 43, Trump 45 (R+2)
Clinton 43, Cruz 46 (R+3)
Clinton 44, Carson 47 (R+3)

SANDERS:
Sanders 39, Rubio 43 (R+4)
Sanders 41, Bush 42 (R+1)
Sanders 43, Trump 44 (R+1)
Sanders 38, Cruz 43 (R+5)
Sanders 40, Carson 44 (R+4)




Does this mean, for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, that Hillary Clinton is conspicuously more electable than Bernie Sanders in the general election?
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,855


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2016, 07:40:26 PM »

Nutz/Cat 16'
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 91,374
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2016, 10:40:00 AM »

Probably not the 2012 type of election some were hoping for.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 13 queries.