There will be no filibustering for the SCOTUS, execpt in "extreme cases."
If that's Robert Bork, okay. If it's Scalia, no real deal has been reached, as the Democrats are just lying.
What in the heck is wrong with Bork? He was a well qualified guy who would have made decisions (for the most part) based on the Constitution. Instead we get stuck with that weasel Kennedy who makes decisions based on international law
Bork was an excellent appointment. By far the most qualified appointment to the SCOTUS in a generation.
That wasn't my point. My point was that they confirmed Scalia, and rejected Bork. Scalia is fine, so if they'll allow a vote on judges like Scalia, that's okay.