I would be interested to see what Nate Silver has to say now that Trump is consistently polling about where Romney was after beating Santorum in Michigan? His entire argument has been that Trump's leads are meaningless when his overall support is low, but surely they mean something now that he is verging on "inevitable nominee" territory.
Probably the same sort of "oh well it was just really improbable!!" schtick that he gave us after this trash:
Actual result of this game for people who do not follow international soccer.
So they predicted a 1 in 4 chance they would lose and then they lose and you have an issue with that?
You ever flipped a coin twice and seen heads come up both times? Because I could easily "predict" that won't happen.
