Committee on Style (PROPOSED CONSTITUTION ADOPTED)

<< < (2/11) > >>

Lincoln Republican:
Quote from: VP Duke on April 18, 2016, 11:44:07 AM

Whenever I read this topic headline, I think of simfan :P



Simfan, one of the truly great Atlasians.

Adam Griffin:
Quote

You must be logged in to read this quote.


*affected

I'm going to make sure to go over this with a fine-toothed comb once we're done to make sure we don't have any Yankee-errors in this Constitution. :P

Leinad:
Quote from: Senator Truman on March 31, 2016, 06:35:20 PM

Section 1 (The Judiciary)
i. The judicial power of the Republic of Atlasia shall be vested in the Supreme Court, the membership of which shall consist of two Justices and three Associate Justices



I think it should be "Federal Justices" or "Federal Associate Justices" and "Regional Justices" or "Regional Associate Justices." Or something like that. There was a very good reason why I used the terminology I did when we discussed this--namely, the current terms are ambiguous.

Unconditional Surrender Truman:
Quote from: President Griffin on April 25, 2016, 03:05:02 AM

Quote

You must be logged in to read this quote.


*affected

I'm going to make sure to go over this with a fine-toothed comb once we're done to make sure we don't have any Yankee-errors in this Constitution. :P


As will I - thanks for catching that.

Quote from: Governor Leinad on April 25, 2016, 06:17:55 PM

Quote from: Senator Truman on March 31, 2016, 06:35:20 PM

Section 1 (The Judiciary)
i. The judicial power of the Republic of Atlasia shall be vested in the Supreme Court, the membership of which shall consist of two Justices and three Associate Justices



I think it should be "Federal Justices" or "Federal Associate Justices" and "Regional Justices" or "Regional Associate Justices." Or something like that. There was a very good reason why I used the terminology I did when we discussed this--namely, the current terms are ambiguous.


Eh, distinguishing between "Federal" and "Regional" Justices seems more confusing to me, since the Associate Justices have both federal and regional responsibilities.

Leinad:
Quote from: Senator Truman on April 25, 2016, 07:37:30 PM

Quote from: Governor Leinad on April 25, 2016, 06:17:55 PM

Quote from: Senator Truman on March 31, 2016, 06:35:20 PM

Section 1 (The Judiciary)
i. The judicial power of the Republic of Atlasia shall be vested in the Supreme Court, the membership of which shall consist of two Justices and three Associate Justices



I think it should be "Federal Justices" or "Federal Associate Justices" and "Regional Justices" or "Regional Associate Justices." Or something like that. There was a very good reason why I used the terminology I did when we discussed this--namely, the current terms are ambiguous.


Eh, distinguishing between "Federal" and "Regional" Justices seems more confusing to me, since the Associate Justices have both federal and regional responsibilities.



Maybe (Associate) Justice and Regional Justice, then?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page