Trump calls for ban on Muslim entry to US
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 10, 2025, 11:21:46 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Trump calls for ban on Muslim entry to US
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Author Topic: Trump calls for ban on Muslim entry to US  (Read 19111 times)
Red Willow
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,423
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #150 on: December 09, 2015, 02:44:35 PM »

Should we not take control of our borders?  Especially in this case, where radicalized Muslims want to do us harm?
Liberals always seem to be more worried about not descriminating, and not hurting feelings of various groups, than taking necessary action!

To liberals, the "necessary action" is to allow anyone in that wants to be here. They view borders as just "lines on a map" and want our country to big one giant homeless shelter.
Logged
Zache
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 859


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #151 on: December 09, 2015, 03:16:33 PM »

Should we not take control of our borders?  Especially in this case, where radicalized Muslims want to do us harm?
Liberals always seem to be more worried about not descriminating, and not hurting feelings of various groups, than taking necessary action!

How about the Muslim population already within our borders? My Muslim buddies, American born and raised, left on a cruise to Mexico a couple of days ago. Should they be left stranded, homeless, and effectively stateless in Mexico as Trump desires?
Logged
Gass3268
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,544
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #152 on: December 09, 2015, 03:18:51 PM »

Should we not take control of our borders?  Especially in this case, where radicalized Muslims want to do us harm?
Liberals always seem to be more worried about not descriminating, and not hurting feelings of various groups, than taking necessary action!

To liberals, the "necessary action" is to allow anyone in that wants to be here. They view borders as just "lines on a map" and want our country to big one giant homeless shelter.

So do free-trade big business conservatives who want cheap labor.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,113


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #153 on: December 09, 2015, 03:18:55 PM »

Should we not take control of our borders?  Especially in this case, where radicalized Muslims want to do us harm?
Liberals always seem to be more worried about not descriminating, and not hurting feelings of various groups, than taking necessary action!

How about the Muslim population already within our borders? My Muslim buddies, American born and raised, left on a cruise to Mexico a couple of days ago. Should they be left stranded, homeless, and effectively stateless in Mexico as Trump desires?

Trump already back-pedaled on the Muslim-American citizens abroad stuff.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,400


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #154 on: December 09, 2015, 03:54:48 PM »

So when will Trump call for internment camps for Muslims? Just a matter of time it seems. Maybe they can reuse Manzanar. Tule lake might provide some nice views for the Muslims.
Logged
Trump v. Wong Kim Ark
Fubart Solman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,647
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #155 on: December 09, 2015, 04:06:49 PM »

Two local SurveyUSA polls show that Republicans support Trump's call for a ban on Muslim immigration by a wide margin:

Sam Diego, CA
Overall: 52/48

Republicans: 71/29
Independents: 47/53
Democrats: 37/63

Conservatives: 79/21
Moderates: 39/61
Liberals: 37/63

Fresno, CA
Overall: 59/41

Republicans: 69/31
Independents: 57/43
Democrats: 48/51

Conservatives: 84/16
Moderates: 56/43
Liberals: 42/58

This is why these comments won't hurt Trump in the least in the primary.

I've spent a decent amount of time in Fresno. The results don't surprise me that much.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,635
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #156 on: December 09, 2015, 04:07:53 PM »

Trump already back-pedaled on the Muslim-American citizens abroad stuff.
Not that it matters. They won't remain citizens for long.
Logged
weixiaobao
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 711
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #157 on: December 09, 2015, 04:08:35 PM »




hmm, look like his polls will go up again.  Some of Trump's core supporters probably would still be okay if his statement went even further.  Which is more proof that the 2 parties in the USA kinda move farther and farther into the polar extremes.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #158 on: December 09, 2015, 04:23:38 PM »

Kyle Kondik recently made a good point about how Trump is legitimizing views that Republican voters have probably held for years, but were socially unacceptable until Trump began leading in polls.

Trump could say "Let's kill every Muslim" and Republicans everywhere would sigh in relief about no longer having to pretend to be a decent human being. No more of this "I'm not a racist, but ..." crap.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #159 on: December 09, 2015, 04:48:59 PM »

We've banned certain immigrant groups from entering the country before.  It's constitutional and sensible.  



Are all of these examples outside 1999 "sensible?"

I'm talking about immigrants, not refugees.

So you're in favor of Muslim refugees but not immigrants?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,832
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #160 on: December 09, 2015, 09:48:37 PM »

Kyle Kondik recently made a good point about how Trump is legitimizing views that Republican voters have probably held for years, but were socially unacceptable until Trump began leading in polls.

Trump could say "Let's kill every Muslim" and Republicans everywhere would sigh in relief about no longer having to pretend to be a decent human being. No more of this "I'm not a racist, but ..." crap.

"Well, that might go a bit too far, but drastic times call for drastic measures. Plus, it annoys the Demoncraps, so it must be good!"
Logged
Migrant Crime
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,092
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #161 on: December 09, 2015, 09:51:08 PM »

We've banned certain immigrant groups from entering the country before.  It's constitutional and sensible.  



Are all of these examples outside 1999 "sensible?"

I'm talking about immigrants, not refugees.

So you're in favor of Muslim refugees but not immigrants?

Hypothetically, yes. Refugees are escaping a horrible situation where their lives may be in danger. Immigrants come for a number of reasons
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #162 on: December 10, 2015, 06:24:42 PM »

We've banned certain immigrant groups from entering the country before.  It's constitutional and sensible.  



Are all of these examples outside 1999 "sensible?"

I'm talking about immigrants, not refugees.

So you're in favor of Muslim refugees but not immigrants?

Hypothetically, yes. Refugees are escaping a horrible situation where their lives may be in danger. Immigrants come for a number of reasons

So you're against Muslim immigration, because Muslim immigrants could just be coming over to commit terrorist acts, but you trust refugees?

You can't have it both ways. Either you don't want Muslims to come here, or they should be allowed. You can argue about how much scrutiny they should receive, but your position makes absolutely no sense.
Logged
Migrant Crime
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,092
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #163 on: December 10, 2015, 07:13:51 PM »
« Edited: December 10, 2015, 07:16:48 PM by Green Line »

We've banned certain immigrant groups from entering the country before.  It's constitutional and sensible.  



Are all of these examples outside 1999 "sensible?"

I'm talking about immigrants, not refugees.

So you're in favor of Muslim refugees but not immigrants?

Hypothetically, yes. Refugees are escaping a horrible situation where their lives may be in danger. Immigrants come for a number of reasons

So you're against Muslim immigration, because Muslim immigrants could just be coming over to commit terrorist acts, but you trust refugees?

You can't have it both ways. Either you don't want Muslims to come here, or they should be allowed. You can argue about how much scrutiny they should receive, but your position makes absolutely no sense.

It makes perfect sense. Youre just not very bright. Immigrants and refugees are not the same thing
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #164 on: December 10, 2015, 08:50:54 PM »

We've banned certain immigrant groups from entering the country before.  It's constitutional and sensible.  



Are all of these examples outside 1999 "sensible?"

I'm talking about immigrants, not refugees.

So you're in favor of Muslim refugees but not immigrants?

Hypothetically, yes. Refugees are escaping a horrible situation where their lives may be in danger. Immigrants come for a number of reasons

So you're against Muslim immigration, because Muslim immigrants could just be coming over to commit terrorist acts, but you trust refugees?

You can't have it both ways. Either you don't want Muslims to come here, or they should be allowed. You can argue about how much scrutiny they should receive, but your position makes absolutely no sense.

It makes perfect sense. Youre just not very bright. Immigrants and refugees are not the same thing

Every argument with you is like talking to a brick wall.
Logged
Migrant Crime
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,092
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #165 on: December 10, 2015, 09:15:12 PM »

We've banned certain immigrant groups from entering the country before.  It's constitutional and sensible.  



Are all of these examples outside 1999 "sensible?"

I'm talking about immigrants, not refugees.

So you're in favor of Muslim refugees but not immigrants?

Hypothetically, yes. Refugees are escaping a horrible situation where their lives may be in danger. Immigrants come for a number of reasons

So you're against Muslim immigration, because Muslim immigrants could just be coming over to commit terrorist acts, but you trust refugees?

You can't have it both ways. Either you don't want Muslims to come here, or they should be allowed. You can argue about how much scrutiny they should receive, but your position makes absolutely no sense.

It makes perfect sense. Youre just not very bright. Immigrants and refugees are not the same thing

Every argument with you is like talking to a brick wall.

Well, you don't have to argue with every post I make Wink
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 7 queries.