Would Nixon have won in '60 had there been no voter fraud? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 12:07:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Would Nixon have won in '60 had there been no voter fraud? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
I don't know enough about the election
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Would Nixon have won in '60 had there been no voter fraud?  (Read 3316 times)
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW
« on: November 12, 2015, 06:56:30 PM »

Doubtful.  Kennedy's margin among blacks exceeded any probable fraud.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2015, 07:23:42 PM »

And, of course, Kennedy probably would have won states like Mississippi, Florida, and Virginia if African Americans weren't being systematically disenfranchised. 

I could be wrong about this (and please correct me if I am), but weren't Southern blacks still opposed to the Democratic Party until 1964?
I don't know, but some of the county-level data in Alabama and other states seems to indicate that Nixon ran well in some of the black regions.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2015, 07:24:33 PM »

And, of course, Kennedy probably would have won states like Mississippi, Florida, and Virginia if African Americans weren't being systematically disenfranchised. 

I could be wrong about this (and please correct me if I am), but weren't Southern blacks still opposed to the Democratic Party until 1964?

I don't think they were "unopposed" after either, but they saw the national Democratic Party as a (barely) better vehicle for their interests than the national Republican Party.  In most of the Deep South, Blacks had a choice between a racist party that fought for poor people or a racist party that fought for rich people.

And, of course, Kennedy probably would have won states like Mississippi, Florida, and Virginia if African Americans weren't being systematically disenfranchised. 

I could be wrong about this (and please correct me if I am), but weren't Southern blacks still opposed to the Democratic Party until 1964?

Kennedy won blacks nationally 62-38 over Nixon, and I would be surprised if Southern blacks had substantially different preferences from Northern ones.  Northern blacks had been voting for Democrats for 28 years by this point too.

That makes sense.  I had heard that the reason Northern African-Americans were willing to vote Democrat during the '30s and beyond because by that point Northern Democrats had dropped most of their appeals to racial prejudice and there was already a rift between the Northern and Southern wings of the party.  And that Southern African-Americans would have supported the Republican Party into the '40s at least had they not been prevented from voting.  I don't remember where I heard this though.
The main reason blacks started voting Democrat in the 1930s (at least Northern blacks) was a response to the New Deal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.