Would Nixon have won in '60 had there been no voter fraud? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 03:09:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Would Nixon have won in '60 had there been no voter fraud? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
I don't know enough about the election
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Would Nixon have won in '60 had there been no voter fraud?  (Read 3293 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
« on: November 12, 2015, 05:25:27 PM »

Texas wasn't close enough to be affected by voter fraud--Kennedy's margin there was 2%. That's as much of a crackpot theory as Dems claiming Ohio was stolen in 2004 and Kerry was the rightful winner.

It's possible that Illinois was stolen, but it's true that there was fraud on both sides, so it's impossible to know to what degree they canceled each other out. And Nixon winning Illinois isn't enough to cost Kennedy an EV majority.

There's a reason why Nixon didn't pursue legal challenges to the 1960 results more aggressively.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 15 queries.