|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 05, 2020, 11:41:42 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Constitutional Convention (Moderators: Gustaf, Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Wiping all current laws. (ADOPTED) (search mode)
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Wiping all current laws. (ADOPTED)  (Read 13421 times)
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« on: October 28, 2015, 03:10:25 pm »

I move for a principle vote one wiping all current regional and federal laws and replacing them with the US laws up until the moment the constitution goes live.
I second this motion.
I third it - although I don't support wiping every law.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2015, 01:33:38 pm »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2015, 09:02:32 am »

Nay
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2015, 02:50:41 pm »

Possibly the best way to make sure that people vote is the PM delegates when there is a vote. Many of the delegates may have been unaware that there was a vote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2015, 03:13:01 pm »

Possibly the best way to make sure that people vote is the PM delegates when there is a vote. Many of the delegates may have been unaware that there was a vote.
Thanks Truman for implementing this. Smiley
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2015, 06:42:39 pm »

     Because we have five regions, either option would require the assent of four of those regions. The fraction here doesn't actually make a difference.
Aren't we reducing to three though? This would mean that 3/4 would require all three regions to approve - whereas 2/3 would require only two.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2015, 12:39:19 pm »
« Edited: November 30, 2015, 06:21:22 pm by Clyde1998 »

Abstain
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,925
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2015, 05:07:45 pm »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines