Wiping all current laws. (ADOPTED) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 01:07:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Constitutional Convention (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Wiping all current laws. (ADOPTED) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wiping all current laws. (ADOPTED)  (Read 21827 times)
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« on: October 28, 2015, 03:10:25 PM »

I move for a principle vote one wiping all current regional and federal laws and replacing them with the US laws up until the moment the constitution goes live.
I second this motion.
I third it - although I don't support wiping every law.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2015, 01:33:38 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2015, 09:02:32 AM »

Nay
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2015, 02:50:41 PM »

Possibly the best way to make sure that people vote is the PM delegates when there is a vote. Many of the delegates may have been unaware that there was a vote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2015, 03:13:01 PM »

Possibly the best way to make sure that people vote is the PM delegates when there is a vote. Many of the delegates may have been unaware that there was a vote.
Thanks Truman for implementing this. Smiley
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2015, 06:42:39 PM »

     Because we have five regions, either option would require the assent of four of those regions. The fraction here doesn't actually make a difference.
Aren't we reducing to three though? This would mean that 3/4 would require all three regions to approve - whereas 2/3 would require only two.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2015, 12:39:19 PM »
« Edited: November 30, 2015, 06:21:22 PM by Clyde1998 »

Abstain
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2015, 05:07:45 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.