Diplomatic relationship with other political simulations.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

I am supportive of diplomatice interactions but we should merely include the necessary powers to form treaties, conduct foreign policy, make war etc etc in the Constitution. The nature and content of the relationship should be part of the gameplay, hence its appeal. Deciding it here, would essentially make the decision and therefore remove all the positive aspects of it as potentially being a gameplay issue.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Naturally, it removes stuff from the playable realm.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

That would be interesting. However, the key remains the same for any simulation aspect and that is that people have to respect that aspect and take what is put out as gospel and to the extent that people refuse to do so, it breaks the game so to speak. Yet few seem to realize this and many times we have seen people over and over ignore it out of convenience.