Mr. Presiding Officer, now that this convention in its infinite wisdom has voted to make secession legal, when do we discuss under which terms secession is legal?
Should this not be settled before we get into a protracted discussion about the number of regions?
First to moving to a debate on specific issues about secession and about the regions map, we should establish if secession is legal (and we did that) and what's the number of regions.
After these two principle votes, we'll go back to discuss on the details of secession and about the region map.
There's need to discuss the details of secession. To make examples: there was an amendment about a 3/4 threshold and I assume it'll be debated again. Another example: I want to make sure that voters of an independent region that don't want to stay in that independent region have the right to move to another region, so there will be an amendment on this matter.
We established that secession is legal, but the debate on specific details is not over. Now let's determine the number of regions and then we'll debate about the specific details.
