All the Electable Republicans Are Losing

[Blair]

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

I know as a socialist, you love Trump, but he isn't electable at all.

I ain't no socialist, you low information poster. I'm a conservative.

Trump is the savior America both deserves and desires.

First of all, your profile says "(S-GA)." Secondly, you support Trump. So the evidence suggests otherwise but really you are a troll.

Oh, if you don't understand the background behind S-GA, then you certainly don't know that everyone thinks you are the worst poster in several years around these parts. Guess that's why you're still posting you garbage rants.

I have found that the vast majority of posters on here are smart and nice people. Unfortunately, there are some such as you who are completely clueless and I'm going to call you out on in, I'm going to tell it like it is and if some people don't like it, I'm sorry because my intention is not to offend, unless of course you are just rude and obnoxious. I'm glad you took a poll here showing I am the "worst poster in years around these parts." At least my opinions are informed.

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

 John Kasich is very vanilla, he initially had a pretty much all white male cabinet, not sure if he still does.

So what? This is literally the worse attack line from a republican, I thought you were against giving people token jobs

The media will make a big deal about it, not me. It will get negative attention and some folks will not vote for him because of it. It's about electability, not how I personally feel.

I've seen virtually no-one in the media talk about that as an issue, considering he didn't say that he'll 'probably do nothing to help African Americans'

[dudeabides]

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

I know as a socialist, you love Trump, but he isn't electable at all.

I ain't no socialist, you low information poster. I'm a conservative.

Trump is the savior America both deserves and desires.

First of all, your profile says "(S-GA)." Secondly, you support Trump. So the evidence suggests otherwise but really you are a troll.

Oh, if you don't understand the background behind S-GA, then you certainly don't know that everyone thinks you are the worst poster in several years around these parts. Guess that's why you're still posting you garbage rants.

I have found that the vast majority of posters on here are smart and nice people. Unfortunately, there are some such as you who are completely clueless and I'm going to call you out on in, I'm going to tell it like it is and if some people don't like it, I'm sorry because my intention is not to offend, unless of course you are just rude and obnoxious. I'm glad you took a poll here showing I am the "worst poster in years around these parts." At least my opinions are informed.

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

 John Kasich is very vanilla, he initially had a pretty much all white male cabinet, not sure if he still does.

So what? This is literally the worse attack line from a republican, I thought you were against giving people token jobs

The media will make a big deal about it, not me. It will get negative attention and some folks will not vote for him because of it. It's about electability, not how I personally feel.

I've seen virtually no-one in the media talk about that as an issue, considering he didn't say that he'll 'probably do nothing to help African Americans'

I'm not sure if you are serious or trolling, but the fact is Governor Bush had a far more diverse cabinet than Governor Kasich but more importantly, his policies helped everyone, including those in minority communities. Now, as to that comment he made TWENTY-ONE YEARS AGO, actions speak louder than words.

[Leinad]

If you don't know the reasoning behind the S-GA avatars, you must be oblivious to what's going on here. Two quite popular, quality posters were controversially banned around the same time, and they both have S-GA avatars. Many people, including conservatives and libertarians, had Socialist avatars, and it didn't make them socialist at all.

Also, the majority of "Trump supporters" are ironic. Why? Because it's funny. I'd vote for almost every candidate in the race over him, but his entry into presidential politics is the greatest thing to happen in presidential politics for a long, long time.

And how the hell does a Jeb Bush fanboy call anybody Vanilla?

The fact that he's a Jeb Bush fanboy implies that he uses vastly different logic than the rest of us.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

I know as a socialist, you love Trump, but he isn't electable at all.

I ain't no socialist, you low information poster. I'm a conservative.

Trump is the savior America both deserves and desires.

First of all, your profile says "(S-GA)." Secondly, you support Trump. So the evidence suggests otherwise but really you are a troll.

Oh, if you don't understand the background behind S-GA, then you certainly don't know that everyone thinks you are the worst poster in several years around these parts. Guess that's why you're still posting you garbage rants.

I have found that the vast majority of posters on here are smart and nice people. Unfortunately, there are some such as you who are completely clueless and I'm going to call you out on in, I'm going to tell it like it is and if some people don't like it, I'm sorry because my intention is not to offend, unless of course you are just rude and obnoxious. I'm glad you took a poll here showing I am the "worst poster in years around these parts." At least my opinions are informed.

A lot of people change their avatars to that of banned posters when they feel the ban was wrong. The S-GA is to show solidarity for Adam Griffin and Bacon King.

He is not a socialist.
 

[dudeabides]

If you don't know the reasoning behind the S-GA avatars, you must be oblivious to what's going on here. Two quite popular, quality posters were controversially banned around the same time, and they both have S-GA avatars. Many people, including conservatives and libertarians, had Socialist avatars, and it didn't make them socialist at all.

Also, the majority of "Trump supporters" are ironic. Why? Because it's funny. I'd vote for almost every candidate in the race over him, but his entry into presidential politics is the greatest thing to happen in presidential politics for a long, long time.

And how the hell does a Jeb Bush fanboy call anybody Vanilla?

The fact that he's a Jeb Bush fanboy implies that he uses vastly different logic than the rest of us.

First of all, I want to thank you for explaining the avatar to me. Secondly, I completely see the comedic value of Donald Trump. The problem is, we need to get serious about good public policy and not the crap Trump is talking about. There is a time and place for comedy, there is a time and place for governing, and while sometimes the two go interchangeably, it isn't generally a purposeful effort on the part of a given candidate.

Now, if you believe that I use different logic because I don't support who you support, then I think you might want to adjust this attitude of yours because I have a difference of opinion. I disagree with Ron Paul fans on some issues, but as a group they are high information voters, so I agree to disagree and move on without saying they lack logic etc.  

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

I know as a socialist, you love Trump, but he isn't electable at all.

I ain't no socialist, you low information poster. I'm a conservative.

Trump is the savior America both deserves and desires.

First of all, your profile says "(S-GA)." Secondly, you support Trump. So the evidence suggests otherwise but really you are a troll.

Oh, if you don't understand the background behind S-GA, then you certainly don't know that everyone thinks you are the worst poster in several years around these parts. Guess that's why you're still posting you garbage rants.

I have found that the vast majority of posters on here are smart and nice people. Unfortunately, there are some such as you who are completely clueless and I'm going to call you out on in, I'm going to tell it like it is and if some people don't like it, I'm sorry because my intention is not to offend, unless of course you are just rude and obnoxious. I'm glad you took a poll here showing I am the "worst poster in years around these parts." At least my opinions are informed.

A lot of people change their avatars to that of banned posters when they feel the ban was wrong. The S-GA is to show solidarity for Adam Griffin and Bacon King.

He is not a socialist.
 

Thank you for taking the time to explain it to me, I appreciate it.

[Leinad]

If you don't know the reasoning behind the S-GA avatars, you must be oblivious to what's going on here. Two quite popular, quality posters were controversially banned around the same time, and they both have S-GA avatars. Many people, including conservatives and libertarians, had Socialist avatars, and it didn't make them socialist at all.

Also, the majority of "Trump supporters" are ironic. Why? Because it's funny. I'd vote for almost every candidate in the race over him, but his entry into presidential politics is the greatest thing to happen in presidential politics for a long, long time.

And how the hell does a Jeb Bush fanboy call anybody Vanilla?

The fact that he's a Jeb Bush fanboy implies that he uses vastly different logic than the rest of us.

First of all, I want to thank you for explaining the avatar to me. Secondly, I completely see the comedic value of Donald Trump. The problem is, we need to get serious about good public policy and not the crap Trump is talking about. There is a time and place for comedy, there is a time and place for governing, and while sometimes the two go interchangeably, it isn't generally a purposeful effort on the part of a given candidate.

Now, if you believe that I use different logic because I don't support who you support, then I think you might want to adjust this attitude of yours because I have a difference of opinion. I disagree with Ron Paul fans on some issues, but as a group they are high information voters, so I agree to disagree and move on without saying they lack logic etc.  

Yeah, there's a time and place for governing, but this is actually posting on internet forums, not governing.

It's less a matter of our difference of opinion, but Jeb Bush himself. I find it hard to imagine someone being so outspokenly, enthusiastically in favor of not only an establishment candidate, but one named Bush no less!

I disagree with Bernie Sanders on several things, specifically economics, but I totally get why people could be overly enthusiastic about him. Ditto for Ted Cruz--if you're an anti-establishment staunch conservative, I'd understand getting excited about him. I even see the appeal to Kasich, a moderate, more than I can see the appeal to Jeb.

Maybe this is just a combination of Bush-fatigue and a dislike of both parties' establishments blinding me, but I just find it...perculiar how someone could find him such a tremendously better candidate than everyone else to post 1,627 times a day about how great he is. But whatever floats your boat, I suppose!

[Brittain33]

Why doesn't Scott Walker get more credit for being an unusually effective and doctrinaire conservative?

[Blair]

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

I know as a socialist, you love Trump, but he isn't electable at all.

I ain't no socialist, you low information poster. I'm a conservative.

Trump is the savior America both deserves and desires.

First of all, your profile says "(S-GA)." Secondly, you support Trump. So the evidence suggests otherwise but really you are a troll.

Oh, if you don't understand the background behind S-GA, then you certainly don't know that everyone thinks you are the worst poster in several years around these parts. Guess that's why you're still posting you garbage rants.

I have found that the vast majority of posters on here are smart and nice people. Unfortunately, there are some such as you who are completely clueless and I'm going to call you out on in, I'm going to tell it like it is and if some people don't like it, I'm sorry because my intention is not to offend, unless of course you are just rude and obnoxious. I'm glad you took a poll here showing I am the "worst poster in years around these parts." At least my opinions are informed.

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

 John Kasich is very vanilla, he initially had a pretty much all white male cabinet, not sure if he still does.

So what? This is literally the worse attack line from a republican, I thought you were against giving people token jobs

The media will make a big deal about it, not me. It will get negative attention and some folks will not vote for him because of it. It's about electability, not how I personally feel.

I've seen virtually no-one in the media talk about that as an issue, considering he didn't say that he'll 'probably do nothing to help African Americans'

I'm not sure if you are serious or trolling, but the fact is Governor Bush had a far more diverse cabinet than Governor Kasich but more importantly, his policies helped everyone, including those in minority communities. Now, as to that comment he made TWENTY-ONE YEARS AGO, actions speak louder than words.

What about when he kicked black voters off the roll for the 2000 election for absolutely no reason?

[Beezer]

Why doesn't Scott Walker get more credit for being an unusually effective and doctrinaire conservative?

Cause he doesn't call women "fat pigs." Now that's the sign of a true conservative.

[dudeabides]

If you don't know the reasoning behind the S-GA avatars, you must be oblivious to what's going on here. Two quite popular, quality posters were controversially banned around the same time, and they both have S-GA avatars. Many people, including conservatives and libertarians, had Socialist avatars, and it didn't make them socialist at all.

Also, the majority of "Trump supporters" are ironic. Why? Because it's funny. I'd vote for almost every candidate in the race over him, but his entry into presidential politics is the greatest thing to happen in presidential politics for a long, long time.

And how the hell does a Jeb Bush fanboy call anybody Vanilla?

The fact that he's a Jeb Bush fanboy implies that he uses vastly different logic than the rest of us.

First of all, I want to thank you for explaining the avatar to me. Secondly, I completely see the comedic value of Donald Trump. The problem is, we need to get serious about good public policy and not the crap Trump is talking about. There is a time and place for comedy, there is a time and place for governing, and while sometimes the two go interchangeably, it isn't generally a purposeful effort on the part of a given candidate.

Now, if you believe that I use different logic because I don't support who you support, then I think you might want to adjust this attitude of yours because I have a difference of opinion. I disagree with Ron Paul fans on some issues, but as a group they are high information voters, so I agree to disagree and move on without saying they lack logic etc.  

Yeah, there's a time and place for governing, but this is actually posting on internet forums, not governing.

It's less a matter of our difference of opinion, but Jeb Bush himself. I find it hard to imagine someone being so outspokenly, enthusiastically in favor of not only an establishment candidate, but one named Bush no less!

I disagree with Bernie Sanders on several things, specifically economics, but I totally get why people could be overly enthusiastic about him. Ditto for Ted Cruz--if you're an anti-establishment staunch conservative, I'd understand getting excited about him. I even see the appeal to Kasich, a moderate, more than I can see the appeal to Jeb.

Maybe this is just a combination of Bush-fatigue and a dislike of both parties' establishments blinding me, but I just find it...perculiar how someone could find him such a tremendously better candidate than everyone else to post 1,627 times a day about how great he is. But whatever floats your boat, I suppose!

Last year, I looked at the records of the perspective presidential candidates, except for John Kasich and Jim Gilmore because I didn't actually think they'd run. I saw some very impressive candidates, Jeb Bush was not the only one I really liked in the beginning but his record of accomplishment surpassed the competition in my view. I also agree with him on most issues. Then the campaign began and unfortunately, several people who I once liked have begun to pander and move away from their core beliefs. Governor Bush has remained consistent, it is far easier to tell what kind of President he'd be than let's say Scott Walker, who has done a great job in Wisconsin in many ways but now he's just pandering too much. I still like and respect Marco Rubio, Carly Fiorina, and Bobby Jindal. I have gained respect for Rand Paul during the early part of this process. Despite my criticisms of some of the others, I will vote for the nominee unless it is Trump. Even Cruz, Santorum, and Carson who I don't like are better than the Democrats.

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

I know as a socialist, you love Trump, but he isn't electable at all.

I ain't no socialist, you low information poster. I'm a conservative.

Trump is the savior America both deserves and desires.

First of all, your profile says "(S-GA)." Secondly, you support Trump. So the evidence suggests otherwise but really you are a troll.

Oh, if you don't understand the background behind S-GA, then you certainly don't know that everyone thinks you are the worst poster in several years around these parts. Guess that's why you're still posting you garbage rants.

I have found that the vast majority of posters on here are smart and nice people. Unfortunately, there are some such as you who are completely clueless and I'm going to call you out on in, I'm going to tell it like it is and if some people don't like it, I'm sorry because my intention is not to offend, unless of course you are just rude and obnoxious. I'm glad you took a poll here showing I am the "worst poster in years around these parts." At least my opinions are informed.

Trump is electable, especially in a three way.

 John Kasich is very vanilla, he initially had a pretty much all white male cabinet, not sure if he still does.

So what? This is literally the worse attack line from a republican, I thought you were against giving people token jobs

The media will make a big deal about it, not me. It will get negative attention and some folks will not vote for him because of it. It's about electability, not how I personally feel.

I've seen virtually no-one in the media talk about that as an issue, considering he didn't say that he'll 'probably do nothing to help African Americans'

I'm not sure if you are serious or trolling, but the fact is Governor Bush had a far more diverse cabinet than Governor Kasich but more importantly, his policies helped everyone, including those in minority communities. Now, as to that comment he made TWENTY-ONE YEARS AGO, actions speak louder than words.

What about when he kicked black voters off the roll for the 2000 election for absolutely no reason?

What about when the U.S. government staged man landing on the moon?