Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 04:43:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 984786 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« on: July 14, 2007, 03:38:20 PM »
« edited: July 14, 2007, 03:45:30 PM by Angry_Weasel »
Yeah, because New Mexico voted less GOP than Ohio and Ohio voted just within the national average...I THINK.

It could be party registration, but there are a lot of DINOS in the South and New Mexico.
Then again, it could be someone's prediction or the 2004 prediction of our website aggregately.

Image Link

This is a SURVEY USA map....though I would think the actual results would be more 50 50
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2007, 04:16:13 PM »
1912?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2007, 08:24:44 PM »
What would happen if Rex and Woody were the only runners with Debs going to Wilson and Taft going TR?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2007, 09:42:19 PM »
Quote from: Lt. Gov. South Park Conservative on July 14, 2007, 08:28:16 PM
Quote from: Angry_Weasel on July 14, 2007, 03:38:20 PM
It could be party registration, but there are a lot of DINOS in the South and New Mexico.
Then again, it could be someone's prediction or the 2004 prediction of our website aggregately.

Neither of those are right. Remember, it has to do with the positioning of the states geographically combined with the 2004 election.
With any election?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2007, 11:48:02 AM »
« Edited: July 15, 2007, 04:42:42 PM by Angry_Weasel »
Quote from: Lt. Gov. South Park Conservative on July 14, 2007, 10:41:38 PM
Quote from: Angry_Weasel on July 14, 2007, 09:42:19 PM
Quote from: Lt. Gov. South Park Conservative on July 14, 2007, 08:28:16 PM
Quote from: Angry_Weasel on July 14, 2007, 03:38:20 PM
It could be party registration, but there are a lot of DINOS in the South and New Mexico.
Then again, it could be someone's prediction or the 2004 prediction of our website aggregately.

Neither of those are right. Remember, it has to do with the positioning of the states geographically combined with the 2004 election.
With any election?

It is partially based on the results of the 2004 presidential election, but also has to do with the states' geography, if that's a hint.

Dvision by the pacific time boundry, Ohio and Mississippi?


What about this map?
Image Link
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2007, 01:06:52 PM »
Any more hints?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2008, 06:25:31 PM »

I don't think it should have been made a state.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2008, 06:43:17 PM »
errrmmm... it looks like the formative blocs of the country.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2008, 01:17:20 PM »


Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2008, 09:37:07 PM »
turnout numbers?

Anyway, look at this-

Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2008, 03:00:46 PM »
Nope. It's not that.
Quote from: Smid on March 30, 2008, 10:05:27 PM
Bill, I'm giving yours some thought... hint, though... is it along the lines of a 2008 map based on the vote achieved by each party in each state in the 2006 Congressional mid-terms? Something along those lines? How hot/cold am I?

Ben, I think I'm off base here, but is it party registrations to the party? I'm guessing that's not it because I'd suspect the Dems to do better in the south and that it wouldn't be quite so polarised as your figures would dictate, but I thought I'd put it out there to show I'm still interested in it... Perhaps another hint? Is it Congressional?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2008, 03:01:29 PM »

Religion?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2008, 03:38:03 PM »
What about my map- Its more legal than political.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2008, 04:03:19 PM »


This is based on demographics, not politics.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2008, 11:27:47 PM »

no.
no....but it is health related.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2008, 11:55:13 PM »

Here. This is it with the shades...and the information is as of 2000.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #16 on: April 23, 2008, 10:59:26 AM »
Quote from: Smid on April 23, 2008, 01:22:58 AM
Interesting how Dark Minnesota and Hawaii are, compared with some of the other states. Also Mississippi, South Carolina and DC very deeply shaded the other way. Since it doesn't seem to have any super-tight correlation with median incomes, I'm guessing it's not proportion of the population with private health insurance but I'm going to guess that anyway since that's something that comes to mind. 

No....but I guess you are luke warm.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #17 on: April 23, 2008, 12:43:13 PM »
Quote from: 24 DuPont Chevy on April 23, 2008, 12:35:14 PM
Quote from: Bilo on April 22, 2008, 11:55:13 PM

Here. This is it with the shades...and the information is as of 2000.
Given the complete opposite shading of MS and MN, is it obesity rates?

closer. but no.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2008, 08:23:08 PM »


Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2011, 06:44:24 PM »
Let me guess. It has nothing to do with 2008...or does it?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.