Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 02:10:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 980119 times)
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« on: May 05, 2013, 12:35:48 AM »

Chris Christie vs a Mondale or Kucinich type democrat, no VPs come to mind at the moment
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2013, 12:55:53 AM »



Best case scenario for the future of the democratic party



Best case scenario for the future of the GOP
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2013, 12:56:55 AM »

I meant for Ohio to be rep in above map
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2013, 02:23:58 PM »

These are 5 possible scenarios for 2016. Please come up with candidates for the scenarios.








Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2013, 10:58:52 PM »

An improbable dream that I would love to see come true. 


Christie/Martinez vs Kucinich/Some State Senator
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2013, 07:56:25 PM »

1972?
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2013, 07:59:43 PM »

Carter and Ford running in 2012.
Republican: 289 (50%)
Democrat: 249 (48%)
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2013, 08:27:03 PM »

Ok I'll give it a shot. RC=remains conservative RL=remains liberal
AL: RC
AK: RC
AZ: Hispanic and Women vs Retirees
AR: RC
CA: RL
CO:Hispanics & Liberal Whites vs Retirees & Rural Whites
CT: Becomes extremely corporate controlled. Angered by Dems corporation restrictions.
DE: RL
FL: Rubio leads Cubans to GOP+retirees
GA: RC
HI: RL
ID: RC
IL: RL
IN: RC
IA: Overall decline causes dissapearance of college towns; Des Moines and other cities have population loss, leading to only Rural Whites left
KS: RC
KY: RC
Part 2 coming up


This is the map between a generic Democrat and a Generic Republican in 2048. Explain the realignment.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2013, 08:57:47 PM »

LA: RC
ME: RL
MD: RL
MA: RL
MI: De-unionization leads to Corporate control
MN: Rural voters here trend Republican, especially in northern part of state.
MS: RC
MO: RC
MT: Becomes a swing state officially.
NE: Huge amounts of oil fracking here and in the Dakotas leads to colossal amounts of pollution, angering the population. This trend is aided by unionization due to the power of the oil companies.
NV: Hispanic population + Liberal whites= solidified as dem state
NH: Dems push for a National Park here, which is created and boosts the economy, making it no longer a swing state.
NJ: RL
NM: Doesn't trend dem any further due to Martinez becoming influential in hispanic vote locally.
NY: RL
NC: Remains a swing state
ND: Same as NE
OH: Remains a swing state
OK: RC
Part 3 coming up
Ok I'll give it a shot. RC=remains conservative RL=remains liberal
AL: RC
AK: RC
AZ: Hispanic and Women vs Retirees
AR: RC
CA: RL
CO:Hispanics & Liberal Whites vs Retirees & Rural Whites
CT: Becomes extremely corporate controlled. Angered by Dems corporation restrictions.
DE: RL
FL: Rubio leads Cubans to GOP+retirees
GA: RC
HI: RL
ID: RC
IL: RL
IN: RC
IA: Overall decline causes dissapearance of college towns; Des Moines and other cities have population loss, leading to only Rural Whites left
KS: RC
KY: RC
Part 2 coming up


This is the map between a generic Democrat and a Generic Republican in 2048. Explain the realignment.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2013, 09:05:02 PM »

OR: RL
PA: Remains a swing state
RI: RL
SC: RC
SD: Same as NE
TN: RC
TX: Hispanic increase + Growth of urban areas=swing state
UT: RC
VT: RL
VA: Remains a swing state
WA: RL
WV: RC
WI: Paul Ryan+Current trends=swing state
WY: RC
DC: RL
LA: RC
ME: RL
MD: RL
MA: RL
MI: De-unionization leads to Corporate control
MN: Rural voters here trend Republican, especially in northern part of state.
MS: RC
MO: RC
MT: Becomes a swing state officially.
NE: Huge amounts of oil fracking here and in the Dakotas leads to colossal amounts of pollution, angering the population. This trend is aided by unionization due to the power of the oil companies.
NV: Hispanic population + Liberal whites= solidified as dem state
NH: Dems push for a National Park here, which is created and boosts the economy, making it no longer a swing state.
NJ: RL
NM: Doesn't trend dem any further due to Martinez becoming influential in hispanic vote locally.
NY: RL
NC: Remains a swing state
ND: Same as NE
OH: Remains a swing state
OK: RC
Part 3 coming up
Ok I'll give it a shot. RC=remains conservative RL=remains liberal
AL: RC
AK: RC
AZ: Hispanic and Women vs Retirees
AR: RC
CA: RL
CO:Hispanics & Liberal Whites vs Retirees & Rural Whites
CT: Becomes extremely corporate controlled. Angered by Dems corporation restrictions.
DE: RL
FL: Rubio leads Cubans to GOP+retirees
GA: RC
HI: RL
ID: RC
IL: RL
IN: RC
IA: Overall decline causes dissapearance of college towns; Des Moines and other cities have population loss, leading to only Rural Whites left
KS: RC
KY: RC
Part 2 coming up


This is the map between a generic Democrat and a Generic Republican in 2048. Explain the realignment.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2013, 07:16:54 PM »

Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2013, 07:19:39 PM »

Scenarios please. red=dem, blue=rep, green=green, yellow=libertarian, orange=whatever 3rd party you want. Maine's 1st congressional district should be orange.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2013, 12:15:54 AM »

That's funny about WV. Here's 1996-2012.

Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2013, 12:25:21 AM »

Time travel is invented and the Constitution lets you have as many VPs as you want. McGovern runs with Mondale, Cox, Muskie, Biden, Boxer, Reid, and Giffords as running mates. Lincoln is Republican candidate. Tongue


Wonder if anyone can guess this one? Hint: it involves a real presidential election and counties.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2013, 01:01:21 AM »

From Atlasia: Majority by states instead of regions. Obviously there are a lot of ties, but here it is.
Federalist 175 yellow
Labor 51 Red
Liberal 42 Blue
Independent 15 Green
Tossup 255 Gray
NMAM and Light don't have any state majorities, and this is using modern day electoral votes.
Oceania is 100% Federalist
Puerto Rico is 100% Labor
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,789
United States


« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2013, 10:26:37 AM »

Chris Christie: 517 (60.8%)
Bernie Sanders: 21 (38.6%)
That's insulting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 10 queries.