Post random maps here
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 05:10:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 ... 238
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 979824 times)
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2975 on: October 15, 2010, 10:58:34 AM »


Jimmy carter Vs. Nelson Rockefeller, 1976???
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2976 on: October 15, 2010, 07:15:47 PM »
« Edited: October 16, 2010, 04:51:07 PM by wormyguy »

Jimmy carter Vs. Nelson Rockefeller, 1976???

I doubt that Rockefeller would lose his home state, but it's based on (a) historical election(s).
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2977 on: October 15, 2010, 09:27:29 PM »


I'm not so sure I agree with "Mummy." That's Egypt. And everybody knows that there's no such place as Luxembourg, so why is it colored in a different shade than Belgium?

"Mummy" probably means the British accent version of "Mommy", as in "I can't stay around and chat with you chaps over tea, my mummy's got me doing her dirty house work."
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2978 on: October 17, 2010, 11:23:36 PM »

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,964
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2979 on: October 18, 2010, 09:01:36 AM »


Oh c'mon, that's too easy !

Dark red : Kennedy/Humphrey/McGovern
Red : Kennedy/Humphrey/Nixon
Light blue : Kennedy/Nixon/Nixon or Nixon/Humphrey/Nixon
Dark blue : Nixon/Nixon/Nixon
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2980 on: October 18, 2010, 01:23:45 PM »


Oh c'mon, that's too easy !

Dark red : Kennedy/Humphrey/McGovern
Red : Kennedy/Humphrey/Nixon
Light blue : Kennedy/Nixon/Nixon or Nixon/Humphrey/Nixon
Dark blue : Nixon/Nixon/Nixon

Right....

I see it simply like this:

Dark red: voted Nixon 0 times out of 3
Light red: 1/3
Light blue: 2/3
Dark blue: 3/3

(note that DC is not included in this map; they got to vote only in 1968 and 1972)
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2981 on: October 24, 2010, 05:02:35 PM »

Have a crack at this one.

Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2982 on: October 24, 2010, 05:57:57 PM »


Green - Perot
Red - Kucinich
Blue - Buchanan

Huh
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2983 on: October 24, 2010, 07:11:20 PM »

No but you're on the right track.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,964
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2984 on: October 25, 2010, 08:27:44 AM »


1992 election giving X% of Bush votes to Perot.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2985 on: October 25, 2010, 09:38:45 AM »


1992 if perot picked up 20% of bush voters and 20% of clinton's
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2986 on: October 25, 2010, 05:21:08 PM »


1992 if perot picked up 20% of bush voters and 20% of clinton's
Actually it's 10% each but I will give it to you.  Perot was polling at 39% before dropping out after which he got 19% in the election.  So that's a hypothetical map if he stayed in and got a +20% bonus in every state (obviously not realistic but the best I can do on that data) and pulled evenly from Bush and Clinton.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2987 on: October 25, 2010, 07:51:53 PM »

 


Anyone care to take a gander?

Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2988 on: October 25, 2010, 07:57:44 PM »


Something to do with either JFK or Bill Clinton most likely. Is it "Buchanan in 1996", or something?
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2989 on: October 25, 2010, 08:03:09 PM »


Something to do with either JFK or Bill Clinton most likely. Is it "Buchanan in 1996", or something?

Very good, but that's not it.

I'll give you a hint: you're two thirds right.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2990 on: October 25, 2010, 08:11:36 PM »


Something to do with either JFK or Bill Clinton most likely. Is it "Buchanan in 1996", or something?

Very good, but that's not it.

I'll give you a hint: you're two thirds right.

OK, that means I have two options left: Perot in '96, or Buchanan in '92. Perot would seem credible if not for the fact that he carries Mississippi, however, I can't see Buchanan making it a tight race in states like Califonia and Maine. However, it has to be one of those two, right?
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2991 on: October 25, 2010, 09:49:55 PM »
« Edited: October 25, 2010, 09:51:30 PM by Somebody's Watching Me »


Something to do with either JFK or Bill Clinton most likely. Is it "Buchanan in 1996", or something?

Very good, but that's not it.

I'll give you a hint: you're two thirds right.

OK, that means I have two options left: Perot in '96, or Buchanan in '92. Perot would seem credible if not for the fact that he carries Mississippi, however, I can't see Buchanan making it a tight race in states like Califonia and Maine. However, it has to be one of those two, right?
No.
Here's another hint: notice anything weird about the map?
That should help you.

It is pretty damn hard, so if you do find out what it is I'll be REALLY impressed.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2992 on: October 26, 2010, 02:15:43 PM »


Blue: states that voted for neither JFK or Bill clinton and voted Republican
Ligth Blue: States that voted for Bill Clinton but not JFK
Green: State that didn't vote for Bill Clinton or JFK, but didn't vote straight Rpeublican, either.
Light Red: States that voted for JFK but not Bill Clinton
Red: States that voted for both Bill Clinton and JFK

That's my rough guess. I can probably adjust it.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2993 on: October 26, 2010, 07:07:49 PM »


Well I have a 24 hour on this, so here goes:

This is a map that gauges the voting behavior of states in the 1928, 1960, and 1992 elections.    If you'll notice there is no Alaska, Hawaii, or DC since none of those places were on the electoral map at the time.  This is pretty much like TrueCon's earlier map, except different candidates and lighter colors (for a happier map!)  A bit random, but pretty interesting since it oddly resembles an alternate 1960 or 1968 electoral map (except the vote percentages, lol). Here is what the colors stand for:

Dark Red: Straight Democratic: Smith/Kennedy/Clinton
Light Red: Mostly Democratic: Hoover/Kennedy/Clinton, Smith/Nixon/Clinton, or Smith/Kennedy/Bush
Green: Smith/Unpledged/Bush
Light Blue: Mostly Republican: Smith/Nixon/Bush, Hoover/Kennedy/Bush, or Hoover/Nixon/Clinton
Dark Blue: Straight Republican: Hoover/Nixon/Bush
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,793
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2994 on: November 06, 2010, 10:46:55 AM »



After Ohio going GOP in 2010, scenario in which Obama wins the presidency in 2012.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,964
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2995 on: November 07, 2010, 06:49:45 AM »



After Ohio going GOP in 2010, scenario in which Obama wins the presidency in 2012.

This map is actually extremely important, because it is exactly how a tied election between Obama and McCain would have turned out in 2008.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2996 on: November 07, 2010, 10:31:22 AM »



After Ohio going GOP in 2010, scenario in which Obama wins the presidency in 2012.

This map is actually extremely important, because it is exactly how a tied election between Obama and McCain would have turned out in 2008.

wouldn't obama have carried virginia??
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,964
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2997 on: November 07, 2010, 04:04:50 PM »



After Ohio going GOP in 2010, scenario in which Obama wins the presidency in 2012.

This map is actually extremely important, because it is exactly how a tied election between Obama and McCain would have turned out in 2008.

wouldn't obama have carried virginia??

No, he'd lose it by 0.96 pts. It surprised me too. Wink
Logged
Applezz
applemanmat
Rookie
**
Posts: 130
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2998 on: November 09, 2010, 10:19:48 PM »

112th Senate:



113th Senate (predicted)Sad



112th House:


2004 presidential:


Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2999 on: November 09, 2010, 10:56:36 PM »


It wouldn't be possible for CO to send 2 Republicans to the Senate; neither Udall nor Bennet will be up in 2012.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 ... 238  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.121 seconds with 11 queries.