|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 28, 2021, 07:09:35 AM

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderators: #CriminalizeSobriety, Dereich)
  Post random maps here		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 ... 239
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 864509 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,883
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2550 on: February 16, 2010, 04:05:38 AM »

Hillary v Palin?
Logged
Smid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,152
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2551 on: February 17, 2010, 05:55:17 PM »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink

Oh, yeah, forgot that you'd mentioned that it had to do with Representatives. Is it perhaps something along the lines of % of incumbents who survived a primary challenge? It seems a bit odd that there'd be states where the majority of incumbents were turfed out in the primaries, but perhaps something along those lines?
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,987
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2552 on: February 17, 2010, 05:56:05 PM »

in 2016 assuming unemployment is 4% and Palin is still a dumb politician.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,956
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2553 on: February 18, 2010, 01:31:54 PM »
« Edited: February 18, 2010, 01:38:38 PM by Northeast Representative Antonio V »

Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 11, 2010, 01:47:43 AM
Ok, I guess I'll make it easier.
Blue States can be considered as "lucky", red States as "unlucky". The darker a State is, the more lucky/unlucky it is. Have a look to North Carolina and Utah in particular : at the time, they were particularly famous for being respectively the luckiest and the unluckiest.

Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink
Logged
MR. KAYNE WEST
olawakandi
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,994
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2554 on: February 18, 2010, 03:31:56 PM »

Mark Warner v Generic Republican
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,809
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2555 on: February 19, 2010, 07:50:50 AM »

Fixed Grin
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,883
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2556 on: February 24, 2010, 08:47:38 PM »
« Edited: February 24, 2010, 11:38:55 PM by shua »




Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,031
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2557 on: February 24, 2010, 10:22:54 PM »
Hm, something to do with the Senate?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Politician
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,117
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: -1.57

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2558 on: February 26, 2010, 08:47:39 PM »

Does it have something to do with Senator ages?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,883
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2559 on: February 27, 2010, 12:26:37 AM »

yes indeed! the first map is of the older senator from each state, the second is of the youngest from each state, with shades representing age instead of percentage.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,956
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2560 on: February 27, 2010, 04:12:09 AM »
Bumping it for the last time.


Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 11, 2010, 01:47:43 AM
Ok, I guess I'll make it easier.
Blue States can be considered as "lucky", red States as "unlucky". The darker a State is, the more lucky/unlucky it is. Have a look to North Carolina and Utah in particular : at the time, they were particularly famous for being respectively the luckiest and the unluckiest.

Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,505


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2561 on: March 01, 2010, 08:58:15 PM »

 
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,031
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2562 on: March 02, 2010, 08:03:42 PM »




Logged
Smid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,152
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2563 on: March 03, 2010, 09:08:37 PM »
Quote from: Smid on February 17, 2010, 05:55:17 PM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink

Oh, yeah, forgot that you'd mentioned that it had to do with Representatives. Is it perhaps something along the lines of % of incumbents who survived a primary challenge? It seems a bit odd that there'd be states where the majority of incumbents were turfed out in the primaries, but perhaps something along those lines?
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,956
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2564 on: March 04, 2010, 05:26:44 AM »
Quote from: Smid on March 03, 2010, 09:08:37 PM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink

Oh, yeah, forgot that you'd mentioned that it had to do with Representatives. Is it perhaps something along the lines of % of incumbents who survived a primary challenge? It seems a bit odd that there'd be states where the majority of incumbents were turfed out in the primaries, but perhaps something along those lines?

Sorry, you didn't got it. Wink

This map shows the variation between the theoretical number of seats a State should get in the House of Representatives and the real number of seats it got under the 2003 apportionment. Blue States are overrepresented while red States are underrepresented.

For example, Utah, with 2,236,714 inh. should have deserved 3.46 seats but got only 3. So, it's underrepresented by 0.46 seats. To the contrary, North Carolina, with 8,067,673 inh., deserved 12.47 seats and got 13. Overrepresented by 0.53 seats.
Logged
Smid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,152
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2565 on: March 08, 2010, 10:55:00 PM »
Quote from: Antonio V on March 04, 2010, 05:26:44 AM
Quote from: Smid on March 03, 2010, 09:08:37 PM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink

Oh, yeah, forgot that you'd mentioned that it had to do with Representatives. Is it perhaps something along the lines of % of incumbents who survived a primary challenge? It seems a bit odd that there'd be states where the majority of incumbents were turfed out in the primaries, but perhaps something along those lines?

Sorry, you didn't got it. Wink

This map shows the variation between the theoretical number of seats a State should get in the House of Representatives and the real number of seats it got under the 2003 apportionment. Blue States are overrepresented while red States are underrepresented.

For example, Utah, with 2,236,714 inh. should have deserved 3.46 seats but got only 3. So, it's underrepresented by 0.46 seats. To the contrary, North Carolina, with 8,067,673 inh., deserved 12.47 seats and got 13. Overrepresented by 0.53 seats.

An excellent idea and an excellent map!
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,956
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2566 on: March 09, 2010, 02:40:44 AM »
Quote from: Smid on March 08, 2010, 10:55:00 PM
Quote from: Antonio V on March 04, 2010, 05:26:44 AM
Quote from: Smid on March 03, 2010, 09:08:37 PM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on February 15, 2010, 01:52:27 AM
Remember, it regards the House of Representatives in 2003. Wink

Oh, yeah, forgot that you'd mentioned that it had to do with Representatives. Is it perhaps something along the lines of % of incumbents who survived a primary challenge? It seems a bit odd that there'd be states where the majority of incumbents were turfed out in the primaries, but perhaps something along those lines?

Sorry, you didn't got it. Wink

This map shows the variation between the theoretical number of seats a State should get in the House of Representatives and the real number of seats it got under the 2003 apportionment. Blue States are overrepresented while red States are underrepresented.

For example, Utah, with 2,236,714 inh. should have deserved 3.46 seats but got only 3. So, it's underrepresented by 0.46 seats. To the contrary, North Carolina, with 8,067,673 inh., deserved 12.47 seats and got 13. Overrepresented by 0.53 seats.

An excellent idea and an excellent map!

Thanks. Smiley
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,750
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2567 on: March 09, 2010, 11:50:23 PM »



The shading is important; the color is irrelevant.

Note that there are only five different shades.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,956
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2568 on: March 10, 2010, 07:23:05 AM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on March 09, 2010, 11:50:23 PM



The shading is important; the color is irrelevant.

Note that there are only five different shades.

Topic ?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,750
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2569 on: March 10, 2010, 01:42:22 PM »
Well, it's non-political.  Try and think about what the darkest states all have in common, and why Maine is the only lightest shade.
Logged
Smid
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 6,152
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2570 on: March 11, 2010, 09:18:28 PM »
Quote from: Joe Republic on March 10, 2010, 01:42:22 PM
Well, it's non-political.  Try and think about what the darkest states all have in common, and why Maine is the only lightest shade.

Are the shades degrees of something or are they five different categories with each state fitting in the relevant category?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Politician
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,117
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: -1.57

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2571 on: March 12, 2010, 06:57:39 PM »
Okay, does it have to do with the Atlasia Presidential election?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,031
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2572 on: March 12, 2010, 10:16:22 PM »

Yes...why did it take so long for the forum to figure this out?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Politician
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,117
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: -1.57

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2573 on: March 12, 2010, 10:18:03 PM »
Hey, I got it right away! Tongue This is just the first time I looked at it.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 9,031
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2574 on: March 12, 2010, 11:00:45 PM »
Quote from: Senator Tmthforu94 on March 12, 2010, 10:18:03 PM
Hey, I got it right away! Tongue This is just the first time I looked at it.

But it's been there 10 days already.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 ... 239  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.118 seconds with 12 queries.